Ce sujet est fermé
Uh like I said, it wouldnt have to be standard issue for someone like Shepard to get a hold of it. The developers allowed a window of a few months before Shepard's death, presumably to allow for developments like the thermal clip.
Ryzaki wrote...
SirWalliss wrote...
Ryzaki do you have nice feet? Or by chance is one a little off?
My ME2 femShep is lez and celebate - by choice. She's not 'forced' to be any other way. As for Jacob, he's a Cerberus dog with a leash on every neck and experiencing severe denial. Garrus knows femShep has both reach and flexibility so he'll never get the opportunity to... have a rematch. And Tali, well, she's a little too young.jlb524 wrote...
Female Shepards aren't forced to be bisexual. Have you played ME2 as a FemShep? There are no f/f romance options. If anything, ME2 forces FemShep to be straight (the Jacob romance is literally thrown at you).
danman2424 wrote...
Uh like I said, it wouldnt have to be standard issue for someone like Shepard to get a hold of it. The developers allowed a window of a few months before Shepard's death, presumably to allow for developments like the thermal clip.
Right and colonists isolated for 10 years grabbed this technology. 
That's not a retcon either!
Modifié par Ryzaki, 27 février 2010 - 01:08 .
PyroFreak301 wrote...
A far less efficient military standard issue if you don't take gameplay into consideration.
Near unlimited ammo > very finite ammo in logisitical terms. It's a retcon that doesn't even make sense outside of gameplay. What were they thinking?!
And Tali, well, she's a little too young.
Right and colonists isolated for 10 years grabbed this technology.
Modifié par Lightice_av, 27 février 2010 - 01:10 .
I don't recall anything about isolated colonists with new technology, but regardless, it was something they changed from the first that was very small, and completely for gameplay purposes. Retroactively changing an entire character that is imperative to the story (gameplay changes mean nothing in terms of the overarching story) is a big no no.Ryzaki wrote...
danman2424 wrote...
Uh like I said, it wouldnt have to be standard issue for someone like Shepard to get a hold of it. The developers allowed a window of a few months before Shepard's death, presumably to allow for developments like the thermal clip.
*sings* RET-CON *sings*
Retroactively changing an entire character that is imperative to the story (gameplay changes mean nothing in terms of the overarching story) is a big no no.
I don't recall anything about isolated colonists with new technology
Modifié par Lightice_av, 27 février 2010 - 01:14 .
danman2424 wrote...
I don't recall anything about isolated colonists with new technology, but regardless, it was something they changed from the first that was very small, and completely for gameplay purposes. Retroactively changing an entire character that is imperative to the story (gameplay changes mean nothing in terms of the overarching story) is a big no no.
danman2424 wrote...
I don't recall anything about isolated colonists with new technology, but regardless, it was something they changed from the first that was very small, and completely for gameplay purposes. Retroactively changing an entire character that is imperative to the story (gameplay changes mean nothing in terms of the overarching story) is a big no no.Ryzaki wrote...
danman2424 wrote...
Uh like I said, it wouldnt have to be standard issue for someone like Shepard to get a hold of it. The developers allowed a window of a few months before Shepard's death, presumably to allow for developments like the thermal clip.
*sings* RET-CON *sings*
Modifié par Ryzaki, 27 février 2010 - 01:17 .
A characters sexual preference doesn't have to change their character at all. We wont see Garrus acting like Zevran or exhibit any other stereotyped gay behaviours. He'll still be the same Garrus, so it wont affect the story in the slightest.danman2424 wrote...
I don't recall anything about isolated colonists with new technology, but regardless, it was something they changed from the first that was very small, and completely for gameplay purposes. Retroactively changing an entire character that is imperative to the story (gameplay changes mean nothing in terms of the overarching story) is a big no no.Ryzaki wrote...
danman2424 wrote...
Uh like I said, it wouldnt have to be standard issue for someone like Shepard to get a hold of it. The developers allowed a window of a few months before Shepard's death, presumably to allow for developments like the thermal clip.
*sings* RET-CON *sings*
She giggles like a 15yo.Lightice_av wrote...
She's 23 or 24 by Mass Effect 2, you know?And Tali, well, she's a little too young.
Because to completely change the character for the benefit of a few gays that feel entitled to getting it on with Jacob or a few ladies that get their kicks off man on man action is a complete spit in the face to the story and a mockery of the characters. Under no circumstances should they be going back into an already completed game and making random characters more flirty or bisexual because some people feel slighted by Bioware for not representing them and their "preferences".Lightice_av wrote...
Modifié par danman2424, 27 février 2010 - 01:27 .
danman2424 wrote...
Because to completely change the character for the benefit of a few gays that feel entitled to getting it on with Jacob or a few ladies that get their kicks off man on man action is a complete spit in the face to the story and a mockery of the characters. Under no circumstances should they be going back into an already completed game and making random characters more flirty or bisexual because some people feel slighted by Bioware for not representing them and their "preferences".
PyroFreak301 wrote...
A characters sexual preference doesn't have to change their character at all. We wont see Garrus acting like Zevran or exhibit any other stereotyped gay behaviours. He'll still be the same Garrus, so it wont affect the story in the slightest.
A lot of your opinions seem to be based on your distain of gay behaviours or homosexuality in general. You seem to be in the minority on these boards when you see homosexuality as a trait to be laughed at.
Modifié par danman2424, 27 février 2010 - 01:25 .
is a complete spit in the face to the story and a mockery of the characters.
danman2424 wrote...
Retroactively changing an entire character that is imperative to the story (gameplay changes mean nothing in terms of the overarching story) is a big no no.
danman2424 wrote...
I came into this thread knowing, that in here, my opinions would be in the minority.
DaeJi wrote...
Not all of the same sex romance supporters are gay.
Of course it changes the entire character. I can think of few things more character defining than one's sexual preference.jlb524 wrote...
danman2424 wrote...
Retroactively changing an entire character that is imperative to the story (gameplay changes mean nothing in terms of the overarching story) is a big no no.
Opening up a romantic path with a character isn't the same as changing the 'entire character' and it definitely has no effect on the story. The characters themselves may impact the story but their sexual orientation and who they can romance does not.
Erode_The_Soul wrote...
DaeJi wrote...
Not all of the same sex romance supporters are gay.
Well apparently, if you are a supporter of this thread, you are either a homosexual person who feels entitled, or a female who gets their jollies by seeing gay men "going at it."
/sarcasm
Modifié par Ryzaki, 27 février 2010 - 01:33 .
I can think of few things more character defining than one's sexual preference.
That's fine, we're obviously interested enough in your opinion to bother replying. What I dont understand it how you can keep claiming it would make a mockery of characters based on nothing more than your personal opinions.danman2424 wrote...
PyroFreak301 wrote...
A characters sexual preference doesn't have to change their character at all. We wont see Garrus acting like Zevran or exhibit any other stereotyped gay behaviours. He'll still be the same Garrus, so it wont affect the story in the slightest.
A lot of your opinions seem to be based on your distain of gay behaviours or homosexuality in general. You seem to be in the minority on these boards when you see homosexuality as a trait to be laughed at.
I came into this thread knowing, that in here, my opinions would be in the minority.
Retour en haut
