100 réponses à ce sujet

[Borschtbeet]

What do you think woul dmake an otherwise great guy/girl undateable?

For a girl...

She can't have a drug problem

No bible thumpers

If her only hobbies are going "clubbin" or going out drinking then forget it.

She can't weigh more than me(I'm 6 ft and weigh 174 lbs)

No smokers

can't be over 21

Speaking of which she needs to be at least somewhat health conscious.  If she eats crap, smokes, and never exercises then it's not going to work out.

She can't from the deep south.  Sorry but I can't stand people from the deep south.

That is just about it.  How about you?

Modifié par Borschtbeet, 27 février 2010 - 07:11 .

[Panderfringe]

- Smoker (cigarettes, anyway; cigars are nice on special occasions)
- Has any book by Ayn Rand/Goodkind (same people, really) or Stephanie Meyers on their list of favourites.
- Puts any stock into New Age stuff like Homeopathy. If they read things like The Secret they better have a good reason.

Oh, and they need to be able to legally drink alcohol.

Modifié par Panderfringe, 27 février 2010 - 07:16 .

[SargeantRenegade]

I only have two dealbreakers: smoking and facial hair. Non-smokers and clean shaven men just don't do it for me (if he's both of the above, he won't even get a second glance).

Pretty shallow of me I know, but that's my prerogative.

[Statulos]

I´m your man then, Sargeant!

Stuff I do not stand in a lady:

-Religious nerds of any sort.

-People who cannot make themselves respected and loved.

-24/7 absorbing people.

Modifié par Statulos, 27 février 2010 - 07:22 .

[Borschtbeet]

Panderfringe wrote...

- Smoker (cigarettes, anyway; cigars are nice on special occasions)
- Has any book by Ayn Rand/Goodkind (same people, really) or Stephanie Meyers on their list of favourites.
- Puts any stock into New Age stuff like Homeopathy. If they read things like The Secret they better have a good reason.

Oh, and they need to be able to legally drink alcohol.

HAHAHA!

I have to agree with you, I've never met anyone male or female who is an Ayn Rand fan who isn't a complete self serving, malicious b**ch/a-hole.
Only people I know who read Stephanie Meyer are gay men and air-headed girls.

It's like

"So, what books do you enjoy?"

"I really loved Atlas Shrugged..."

"I'll get the bill, nice knowing you"

Modifié par Borschtbeet, 27 février 2010 - 07:24 .

[Seagloom]

- Having once been convicted for pedophilia, murder, or rape.

- Having been accused but not necessarily convicted of any of the above.

- Drug addiction

- Bigotry

- Racial prejudice or prejudice against LGBT individuals

- Anyone under 25 is out

- Bad hygiene

- Hates kids

- Has no sense of humor

- Has a history of cheating

- Is only out to have fun (i.e; not looking for a serious relationship)

- Lacks any sense of romance

- Holds political or religious views diametrically opposed to mine (This person could still be a friend, but I couldn't date them. I'm referring to extreme difference of opinion here.)

- Treats others around them poorly. (I don't care if I'm treated like royalty by them. If you're a jerk to everyone else, you're a jerk to me too.)

[Borschtbeet]

Oh yeah I forgot to mention bigotry. If a woman starts spewing racist or homophobic venom we're through.

Although that is pretty much covered in my no bible thumpers and no people from the deep south rule.

Modifié par Borschtbeet, 27 février 2010 - 07:33 .

[Loerwyn]

@Panderfringe - I have Atlas Shrugged, Wizard's First Rule, Stone of Tears, Confessor and Debt of Bones. Debt of Bones is actually a good read... For Goodkind



So, for me, what puts me off?

- Tattoos

- Smoking

- Drugs (instant no straight away)

- Hate of gaming

- Narcissism

- Some medium (or above) make up use

- Tries to force their beliefs on anyone

- Is ill-mannered or rude (Yeah, great, you're eating. I don't want to hear it)

- Tries to change me in any above-subtle way

- Not too bothered by height/weight as long as we're not talking Blue Whale size.

- Has to be taken out on dates at all. I don't have the money, nor the will, to keep working out how to get to Place X via the bus.



Ah, so this is why I'm always single...

[Seagloom]

I guess I can officially scratch Celrath off my potential date list. If I was looking to date anyone, anyway.

Undateable is a real word, yes.

Modifié par Seagloom, 27 février 2010 - 07:38 .

[Loerwyn]

I'd apply, Seagloom, but I'm only 20 and I can't stand kids

[Borschtbeet]

I think it's important people realize that there is a difference between being undateable and unscroggable.

You can scrog people you wouldn't date after all.

I think the only things that would make a girl unscroggable is if she smelled bad, and were fat.

Those are my only pre-requisites really.

Modifié par Borschtbeet, 27 février 2010 - 07:42 .

[Seagloom]

OnlyShallow89 wrote...

I'd apply, Seagloom, but I'm only 20 and I can't stand kids

I don't want kids at the moment. Who knows, maybe I never will. They can drive me crazy at times too. But I have sisters, all with kids, and sometimes I spend time with them. So anyone that dates me is invariably going to have to deal with kids sooner or later.

[cancausecancer]

Define date.. if you mean a normal date then as long as they have a good body. If you mean long term relationship then as long as they treat you good.

[Seagloom]

Borschtbeet wrote...

I think it's important people realize that there is a difference between being undateable and unscroggable.

You can scrog people you wouldn't date after all.

I think the only things that would make a girl unscroggable is if she smelled bad, and were fat.

Those are my only pre-requisites really.

Uh... yeah... no. My undateable and no fling list would be interchangable. Sex isn't so important that I'm going to lower my standards and put my self respect on the chopping block just for a one night stand.

[Loerwyn]

I can't even date.

Relationship or nothing.

[Borschtbeet]

Seagloom wrote...

Borschtbeet wrote...

I think it's important people realize that there is a difference between being undateable and unscroggable.

You can scrog people you wouldn't date after all.

I think the only things that would make a girl unscroggable is if she smelled bad, and were fat.

Those are my only pre-requisites really.

Uh... yeah... no. My undateable and no fling list would be interchangable. Sex isn't so important that I'm going to lower my standards and put my self respect on the chopping block just for a one night stand.

I agree and I respect that.  I'm the same way but I'm just saying under a hypothetical scenario where I was to only judge the merits of a woman based on a scrog, I would be much more liberal about my needs.

[Godak]

Seagloom wrote...

- Having once been convicted for pedophilia, murder, or rape.
- Having been accused but not necessarily convicted of any of the above.
- Drug addiction
- Bigotry
- Racial prejudice or prejudice against LGBT individuals
- Anyone under 25 is out
- Bad hygiene
- Hates kids
- Has no sense of humor
- Has a history of cheating
- Is only out to have fun (i.e; not looking for a serious relationship)
- Lacks any sense of romance
- Holds political or religious views diametrically opposed to mine (This person could still be a friend, but I couldn't date them. I'm referring to extreme difference of opinion here.)
- Treats others around them poorly. (I don't care if I'm treated like royalty by them. If you're a jerk to everyone else, you're a jerk to me too.)

This, minus the under 25 thing. Mainly because my entire prospective audience is under 25...

[Statulos]

Borschtbeet wrote...

Seagloom wrote...

Borschtbeet wrote...

I think it's important people realize that there is a difference between being undateable and unscroggable.

You can scrog people you wouldn't date after all.

I think the only things that would make a girl unscroggable is if she smelled bad, and were fat.

Those are my only pre-requisites really.

Uh... yeah... no. My undateable and no fling list would be interchangable. Sex isn't so important that I'm going to lower my standards and put my self respect on the chopping block just for a one night stand.

I agree and I respect that.  I'm the same way but I'm just saying under a hypothetical scenario where I was to only judge the merits of a woman based on a scrog, I would be much more liberal about my needs.

Sex is a skill that can be trained, tought and learnt. Not a big issue if the partner is willing.

[Armchairsquid]

For me the big ones are



-lack of pulse (this is a big nono)



-not living in the moment every second can be fun if you want it to be



-A gamer girl ( i dated a big gamer once and the only way i could see it working again is if there was 2 of everything i dont share well)



as for weight height race creed age etc not as important as personallity.

[Panderfringe]

OnlyShallow89 wrote...

I can't even date.
Relationship or nothing.

How would you even start one?

[Armchairsquid]

Panderfringe wrote...

OnlyShallow89 wrote...

I can't even date.
Relationship or nothing.

How would you even start one?

ive started a few by falling into their beds drunk:devil:

[Loerwyn]

Panderfringe wrote...
How would you even start one?

Easily: I don't.

[Giant ambush beetle]

Borschtbeet wrote...

What do you think would make an otherwise great guy/girl undateable?

Deal breakers:

- a person I cannot absolutely rely on
- lack of self respect and respect to others
- religion fanatic
- smoking
- older than me
- unathletic
- a person following the mainstream like a train following rails. 
 

But as good ole Bob used to say, no woman no cry. 

Modifié par The Woldan , 28 février 2010 - 12:53 .