rewriting or destroying heretics
#26
Posté 28 février 2010 - 02:55
#27
Posté 28 février 2010 - 03:01
Arhka wrote...
I destroyed the Heretics. Even as Paragon, giving them more reasons to cooperate with the Quarians would help broker peace between them. Also, as awesome as Legion is, I don't think Geth on the front lines would be prudent, as Reapers have already proven they can hack Geth, so what's stopping them from releasing another Virus? Rather have Geth as aces in the hole rather than a significant part of anti-Reaper forces.
I apprecaite this facet HOWEVER there is, notable by its omission, NO discussion of the Quarain Hoem worlds - Legion says the geth want to co exist peacefully - the quarians want their world back - are the 2 mutually exclusive ? ME2 doesn't permit us to try and find out.
#28
Posté 28 février 2010 - 03:15
"we hope to understand how they reached this conclusion"
"their is no why to be sure they will not reach the same conclusion again"
now as they geth share there thoughts whats to stop other geth from joining the heretics once they understand why they reached that conclusion?
to big a risk wipe them out = less geth to worry about end of story
#29
Posté 28 février 2010 - 03:15
Legion says that they will return to Gelf society with their experience and memories of being heretics intact, inriching as well as unifying their society. If he had said that they will be mind wipe and "re-booted" I would have just destroyed them an be done with it.
#30
Posté 28 février 2010 - 03:18
#31
Posté 28 février 2010 - 04:09
Also, the choice to destroy had one more vote than rewrite when he announced the outcome of his programs' vote
#32
Posté 28 février 2010 - 04:16
ATKT wrote...
But you only find out after you make the decision (I think).
Basically I'm starting to think that whatever decision you make, the story will change so that you made the "right" choice. If there is a "right" choice--there kind of isn't. Both choices have their pros and cons.
IIRC Legion mentions that when you first get the option to choose right after being dropped off at the heretic base if you select the Investigate option.
Agreed on the multiple optioned conclusions to the choice. And knowing Bioware from when they did NWN1 ... I wouldn't doubt a possible betrayal based on various previous interactions. A part of me actually hopes for it. I would actually be all for a full geth siding with the Reaper's during the invasion and a weakened Normandy caused by possible Geth subroutines hacking when you had EDI drop the firewalls during the Legion convo's. It would make for a few interesting options .. especially with Tali doing "I told you so" type of rebuttals.
Like I said before, my Shepard's choice was based on what he would of done ... me, I'm not to trusting on programs I don't research about LOL.
#33
Posté 28 février 2010 - 04:22
Then I thought about this a lot and realized I didn't like my conclusion: if I could take the worst serial killers or war criminials in history, and be given the same choice - I'd choose rewrite, absent an emotional compass. I'd far prefer we rebuild people into productive citizens then kill them. The Geth have this capability, why not use it?
I still don't know if I'm positive about it one way or the other.
#34
Posté 28 février 2010 - 04:34
#35
Posté 28 février 2010 - 04:38
#36
Posté 28 février 2010 - 04:44
#37
Posté 28 février 2010 - 04:48
#38
Posté 28 février 2010 - 04:53
I also could've heard wrong three times. It was at like 1 am.
#39
Posté 28 février 2010 - 04:54
#40
Posté 28 février 2010 - 04:57
I am pretty sure he gives you the number of processes on either side, and they are only like 5 apart out of 1100 in favor of rewrite.Delphinus wrote...
@Vaenier Maybe it changes based on previous responses, or something, because I went through that dialogue option in front of the terminal 3 times, so I could be sure that I heard right about Legion's internal conclusion. I was full Renegade by that point, but during the quest I played it in the middle (since Tali was standing over my shoulder), only telling Legion my opinion after he finished.
I also could've heard wrong three times. It was at like 1 am.
#41
Posté 28 février 2010 - 05:00
#42
Posté 28 février 2010 - 05:01
Also, the Geth had majority consenus for rewriting the Heretics, I'll trust their logic.
Modifié par Karasel, 28 février 2010 - 05:03 .
#43
Posté 28 février 2010 - 05:02
#44
Posté 28 février 2010 - 05:02
#45
Posté 28 février 2010 - 05:07
I destroid them on my second playthrough but it was pretty much a coin flip. If you rewrite them the geth might be a little stronger off to fight the Reapers but there was only a few million heretic platforms so it probably won't make a difference in the long term. The choise might affect the outcome of a possible war with quarians so I decided to wipe them out.
#46
Posté 28 février 2010 - 05:13
Wow, its actually even closer, a 0.35% difference.
#47
Posté 28 février 2010 - 05:17
It was 573 to 571 or something.
He said he wasn't able to reach consensus though
#48
Posté 16 novembre 2011 - 01:13
Call it BFG (doom) call it M-920.. that thing wont let you down..
Modifié par LamogiasGR, 16 novembre 2011 - 01:14 .
#49
Posté 17 novembre 2011 - 03:30
I looked at it as more of a moral question separately from a cost/benefit analysis that I've read in this thread.
On the one hand I was appalled that the Heretics were going to reprogram (essentially brainwash) the Geth into following the Heretics. On the other, I was taken aback that Legion when given the option didn't seem to have a problem if it was done to Heretics. As others have indicated, Legion said it was racist to assume the Geth thought as humans do about such things.
The first time I rewrote the Heretics because I didn't like the idea of wiping out thousands of beings when given the option not to. The 2nd time I decided that the Heretics had made their decision on their own, and, as someone that values freedom, rewriting the Heretics was about as "wrong" as rewriting the Geth, so I destroyed the base. War is war, and the enemy picked their side.
But for me it raises the question, we live in some pretty violent times right now. If there was a human virus that could, say, affect Al Qaeda and make them change their mind and work peacefully with the Afghanistan government, should it be used as opposed to, say, bombing and bribing the crap out of them (the current plan)? My gut reaction is, "yeah, let's save some lives." That would be the cost/benefit analysis. For sure the terrorists would use it if it was available.
Is brainwashing, if feasible, a legitimate weapon of war? Certainly propaganda already is, and that is practically the same thing.
Modifié par Obadiah, 17 novembre 2011 - 03:31 .
#50
Posté 17 novembre 2011 - 01:01
Obadiah wrote...
It's an odd option.
I looked at it as more of a moral question separately from a cost/benefit analysis that I've read in this thread.
I vehemently disagree. There is no moral or ethical dilemma in the very slightest. There is no fate so awful that the heretic geth don't deserve it. Think about what they're trying to do. They want to assist in something that will kill more people than we can even really fathom. The council mentioned that their decisions effect trillions, so there's at the very least several trillion people in the Milky Way right now that the Reapers are going to try to kill. But that's just right now. Who knows how many times they have and will do it? Imagine that someone were to try and cause a nuclear winter in our current era. Just wiped out mankind. What kind of fate do you think he deserves? because that's not even a drop in the bucket, that's a drop in the ocean compared to what the geth want to help the Reapers do. And unlike the rest of the Reaper's servants, the heretic geth are with them willingly. They were not technologically enslaved.





Retour en haut






