Aucune réponse à ce sujet

[Highdragonslayer]

 When you use blood magic you can assume direct control right? So when direct intervention is neccesary you can show your enemies true power. Why does the chantry forbid this then, because they themselves assume direct control quite often, through the use of lyrium on the templars. Even that buisness with the templars is worse because it will defienitely tear them apart in the end. Also could blood magic be the chantries harbringer of their destruction, is that why they're so afraid of it, or perhaps they believe that the maker is the harvenger of their perfection? This is a very touchy subject imo. 

     Also with warriors they can take down mages very easily, their attacks tear them apart. So wouldn't a warrior be able to say "this hurts you" as opposed to a mage, or even a blood mage? Although with poweful blood magic, a warrior can be shown the blood mage's true power, after all their power is unmatched. I find it very interesting to say the least. The chantry most likely thinks that the mage's agression factor could be useful if controlled.