Busomjack wrote...
I agree with this post somewhat. Affirmative Action should be modified so that it applies to income rather than race. Therefore, poor people can benefit and nobody is negatively affected based on skin color. Everybody wins.
Now as for compensating for historical wrongs not being the answer, I dissagree. During segregation, blacks could not hold many jobs, and very few could attend college. As a result, blacks basically had no choice but to live in poverty.
Now there are laws which prohibit discrimination but that doesn't magically uplift blacks out of their socio-economic status. They're still poor, live in economically segregated communities, have crappy overcrowded underfunded schools and live in neighborhoods where crime, drugs and gangs are prevalent.
This all translates into less opportunity and therefore keeps black communities stuck in poverty.
I think the federal government should stop basing education funding on real-estate taxes. Poor blacks can't afford much property so obviously local governments there aren't going to be able to afford good schools.
We really need intervention to correct past wrongs. Much progress has been made, but there is still work to be done.
I think I simply didn't express my point very well. I agree with you, but I think that unthinking "throw money at it and it will go away" solutions are not the answer and too often governments believe they are. Intelligent use of money and resources to produce long term payoffs is what I support. This ideal, however, usually means that you have to go through a period of time where there is little perceived change or progress. Try selling that idea to a public if you're a polititian...




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut








