Lightice_av wrote...
I've heard plenty of discussion about the subject, but in my personal experience the masters tend to be relatively small, wiry men with slightly above average strength, huge endurance and phenomenal dexterity.
Most "masters" are quite old, which is the reason they are small and wiry

"Regular" teachers can be of any kind of size and muscular type.
Though most serious practionners are in fact wiry, because wiry muscles are usually the most efficients when it comes to strength + speed.
Endurance has nothing to do with muscles, and the "huge" endurance is often simply due not to a particularly high stamina, but rather simply because as you master your techniques, you learn to do them "purer", involving less efforts.
I know that I was sweating and exhausted at the end of my classes when I was a beginner, and now I am usually not even tired. And I didn't improve my physical condition a lot - age is starting to take some light tolls

- but I simply have more efficient moves.
"dexterity" is not "agility". Most teacher aren't exceptionnaly suples or agile. The apparent dexterity simply comes from, like above, better/purer moves.
So in other words : yes, techniques allow them to be more efficients. Doesn't change anything about "being stronger is better" and how strength is always a big plus.
The real "master" have simply such a huge advantage in technique against about anyone that they can compensate a lot of strength.
Still, put a master against a krogan, he will be ripped apart

Male soldiers are above average men, but not nearly as above average than female soldiers tend to be.
It's possible for a guy to be a soldier and still slack off a lot, while the few women who choose military careers tend to be at the highest peak of fitness.
Well, you're proving my point here, you know ?
Modifié par Akka le Vil, 03 mars 2010 - 01:25 .