And as I say : compare two comparable averages. You pointed yourself that the women in military are even more special relative to women, than men in military are relative to other men.Lightice_av wrote...
I never said that in averages a man
is stronger than a woman; just that a trained female combatant can take
on a trained male combatant and win.
So, to take completely made-up numbers, if only the top 2 % of women make it in in the military, compare them to the top 2 % of men, not the top 10 % who make in into the military.
And of course a trained woman can take a trained man. Anything can happen in a fight, again. I'll still, on average, keep my bet on the man, by a large amount.
Depends on what she meant.MKATAKM wrote...
ERJAK2 said something different, claimed that having less muscles meant being faster. That didn't sound logical to me. If it is true than you may be right. Since you are the martial arts expert among us, what do you think?
It could be somehow true if she was just talking about the volume (developping the volume can in fact decrease the speed).
It's false if she was talking in general. Speed is a characteristic muscles have - it's mostly a gift, though you can train it. The biggest increase in speed you can get is in fast simply through making your movements as "pure" as possible, not through having cat-like reflexes.
If your muscles are "fast", it's actually a decrease in your speed to have less - the less you have, the less force they can pass through your limbs, and hence you get a limit on your speed.
I'll have to get more than your word only to believe itLightice_av wrote...
Yes, because
they've degenerated into shows of strength. In many martial arts mixed gender fights are quite common, and predicting the end result by the gender alone is precacious business indeed.
Modifié par Akka le Vil, 03 mars 2010 - 01:38 .





Retour en haut




