Meshick wrote...
RenownedRyan wrote...
1. Humans have different accents
2. If every character wore armor the game would have no variation, and you'd complain about that too.
3. Why would loyalty have anything to do with Garrus's armor? It probably has sentimental value to him.
4. I really happen to like Grunt, and do not consider him a useless mercenary. Your personal opnion does not constitute any "Irrational (stupid) thing"
5. Some areas have nothing else to do after accomplishing their mission. Would you return to Freedom's Progress?
6. The Council could be dead, it would have been difficult to have them play a major role.
7. masseffect.wikia.com/wiki/Shadow_Broker
And by Enkindlers I assume that you're a Prophetic Hanar and you mean the Protheans?
masseffect.wikia.com/wiki/Protheans
I sincerely hope that BioWare does not take your post to heart. Please try to make more critiques and less irrational (stupid) criticisms.
Dude READ AGAIN <
1.Only Quarians having idiotic accents in the game and they different from each ather....
2.There is armor (wich can be different too) and casual closing .... so for example jack - not taking her crazy boots off even wile having sex 
3.I wrote about Grunt ,that is my PERSONAL point of view
4.About "locked" areas - here an example : after kiking ass in suicide mission - why omega 4 relay is closed (bad dudes are dead and You kept the ship for the boss)?
5.If You save the council few dudes on Citadel are much frendlier to Shepard or If there new council (in both cases) Shepard CAN get his spector status back - it means he works for them - got my point ?
6.I wrote ,that I've made a misstake - I ment HANARS ,that having no role at all in ME2 (only joke about new spector-gelly fish)
7.And "I sincerely hope that BioWare does take my post to heart" because I've payed for short game with lots of misstakes in storyline and tonz of mini DLC's wich keeping you frustrated of not having the hole game .... I've payed for Collectors edition,but I see upcoming stuff is also not for free (wich is another issue) .... By the way in ME1 You could "buy" lots of weapons and ather stuff in the game now You will pay REAL money for each......
Whant example of another RPG with DLC's ? - I'll give You one - and it's called "Fallout3" - huge amount equipment - great long story , massive open spaces 5 big DLCs (not one rifle or armor....) wich came in short period of time - so short You could not finish original story twice - thats what I call great game and fare treatment !
1. Alright. The Quarian accents are kind of silly.
2. I hated Jack's outfit. HATED it. Im like you, I much prefer armor. I was just saying that the game makers are entitled to do what they wish with character design to mix up the gameplay
3. I know, that's what I was saying.
4. It would be nice to revisit the areas, but I still don't know what you would do there.
5. I got your point. The Council is extremely stubborn in both games, but I get why it bothers you. They are extremely frustrating to put up with.
6. Ah I see. My mistake. You're right, the Hanar never appear in the entire game. They are only mentioned on an intercom on Illium. Not sure why.
7. I believe the game makers goal in removing the so much of the armor and weapons from the first was to simplify the game and to put more focus on relationships and the plotline. I get what you're saying here too though, because I also missed the armor.
Meshick, it seems to me that the games you really enjoy are all "free-roaming" games. Where you can do just about anything you want. I am a big fan of these as well, I own Farcry 2, Morrowind, Oblivion, and Fallout 3. The problem is that Mass Effect is deeply embedded in its storyline, and that BioWare simply doesn't make free-roaming games. This is a story-driven game, with very few bonus quests which I think is what upsets you more than anything. The mistake you made was posting this on the BioWare site as opposed to a Bethesda site. It was doomed to result in a flame fest.