CC-Tron wrote...
Deztyn wrote...
Missed this earlier.CC-Tron wrote...
Sure if you leave out Jacob's noble intentions, the skills he provides besides combat for Cerberus, Thane specifically killing people for a living and that's pretty much the only skill he provides to earn a living
then there isn't much difference. However that's a hell of a lot to leave out to make pot meet kettle.
. . . you're leaving out the fact that Thane was trained from early childhood by his government to be an assassin. You are also leaving out the fact that Thane goes after Nassana and joins Shepard due to a desire to make the galaxy a better place. You are leaving out a few things to make your point, which seems to be "Jacob can do no wrong."
I didn't leave that out. I know about Thane's past. I read the ME wiki article. My point was to explain why Jake had issues with Thane despite being a member of Cerberus himself. Also to show the obvious differences in profession and motivation between the 2 men. I already did that. I never claimed any where Jake could do no wrong. However I did imply there is a significant difference between what Jake does for Cerberus
with noble intentions for humanity and Thane does as a freelance
assassin.
. . . you still seem to have trouble comprehending what I'm saying, maybe I haven't made it clear enough.
To rephrase: There is no significant difference between what Jake does for Cerberus with noble intentions for humanity and what Thane does as a freelance assassin with noble intentions for the galaxy.
You, much like Jacob seem to think being an assassin automagically disqualifies Thane from being a fundamentally decent person who wants the best for the universe. This is wrong. Just as wrong as saying that because Jacob is a terrorist he can't want what's best for the galaxy. Jacob's comments make even less sense if he was in your squad when you talk to Seryna and meet Thane (as he was in my first playthrough).
Modifié par Deztyn, 04 mars 2010 - 02:51 .





Retour en haut







