Aller au contenu

Photo

Mass Effect DRM: What's the problem?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
130 réponses à ce sujet

#1
DaveTheJackal

DaveTheJackal
  • Members
  • 238 messages
I really can't undersand all the comments about Mass Effect's DRM on amazon. What's to object about:

With secure ROM I get to install my software on multiple PCs.
Tfter they relaxed the DRM on ME1, I could even lend it to 4 friends, had I chosen to, and they could play the game at the same time as me.
Though there was a 5 activation limit, all it takes is a call to EA and, providing you're not obviously a villain, they'll supply new activations for you on demand.
Contrary to popular belief, I don't believe an actual root kit is installed.

Compare this to Steam.

With steam only one person can ever play a game at once.
I can never resell my games.
What's more, I don't own my games and should Valve decide to block my account, I lose everything. Every game I have registered on steam is gone. It's not even like a rental, it's more like temporary permission to use the game.

And yet the DRM whiners don't bother complaining steam games at all, they don't attempt to get a game low ratings, none of that nonsense.

What is their problem? Is Valve behind it all? I think we should be told! :police:

EDIT: I'm not suggesting Valve's DRM should be flamed, I'm asking why EA's DRM gets flamed when Valve's (which in many ways is more restrictive), doesn't.

Modifié par DaveTheJackal, 07 mars 2010 - 04:31 .


#2
Guest_Heartlocker_*

Guest_Heartlocker_*
  • Guests
That's why I don't use steam or digital services. I either torrent [ I never do it anymore since I own a 360.] and buy games cheap from Costumer 2 Costumer auction sites. I can play the games for good quality, cheap and resell it with some profit.



Sometimes being too digital harms me.

#3
ZMJ10

ZMJ10
  • Members
  • 375 messages

Heartlocker wrote...

That's why I don't use steam or digital services. I either torrent [ I never do it anymore since I own a 360.] and buy games cheap from Costumer 2 Costumer auction sites. I can play the games for good quality, cheap and resell it with some profit.

Sometimes being too digital harms me.



could u tell some of those website, im interested in looking at them. thanx

#4
Blackadderthethird

Blackadderthethird
  • Members
  • 41 messages
There are positive sides to Steam as well.



You have access to your games at any PC with a connection

Don't have to worry about DVD/CD's being scratched

No need to insert a disc to play a game

Easy to use

Fast downloads

Games are always up to date



I think Steam is brilliant, I don't mind the negative sides at all. Wish I could buy all my games through Steam

#5
ToJKa1

ToJKa1
  • Members
  • 1 246 messages
Steam is a restrictive DRM method, yes. The difference between Steam and SecuROM however is, that Steam offers services for the customer, which means it has worth for the customer too, whereas all that SecuROM does is annoy with the "Wrong disc inserted" pop-ups and count how many times you've installed the game.

#6
Guest_Heartlocker_*

Guest_Heartlocker_*
  • Guests

ZMJ10 wrote...

Heartlocker wrote...

That's why I don't use steam or digital services. I either torrent [ I never do it anymore since I own a 360.] and buy games cheap from Costumer 2 Costumer auction sites. I can play the games for good quality, cheap and resell it with some profit.

Sometimes being too digital harms me.


could u tell some of those website, im interested in looking at them. thanx


I live in the Netherlands, so I use locale based action sites. It's easy to use and has close connections to Paypal. Safe and fast, the way I like it.

Modifié par Heartlocker, 05 mars 2010 - 01:59 .


#7
mxfox408

mxfox408
  • Members
  • 261 messages
In the past I was skeptical about using steam but love it now. I don't have to worry about any Bs like getting banned but I don't have to worry about scratched or missing cds or missplaced cd keys. Steam is awsome especially with the offline mode.

Modifié par mxfox408, 05 mars 2010 - 04:47 .


#8
Gorn Kregore

Gorn Kregore
  • Members
  • 636 messages
Only use steam to buy Valve games only. Never ever waste your cash on other games. Unless someone gifts it to you for free.

#9
Dethateer

Dethateer
  • Members
  • 4 390 messages
Well, Steam DOES have that extremely sweet THQ complete pack...

#10
LuPoM

LuPoM
  • Members
  • 637 messages

ToJKa1 wrote...

Steam is a restrictive DRM method, yes. The difference between Steam and SecuROM however is, that Steam offers services for the customer, which means it has worth for the customer too, whereas all that SecuROM does is annoy with the "Wrong disc inserted" pop-ups and count how many times you've installed the game.


^That's the truth!

#11
Guest_KeeLoGee_*

Guest_KeeLoGee_*
  • Guests
The difference between Steam and Suck-U-ROM is that for Steam, you don't need a POS tool to try and "clear" your activations. My brother had a copy of Need For Speed Undercover that he wanted to try with his setup but ran out of activations. He tried using the tool for "resetting" the activations but that didn't even work! He ended up getting another copy for $10 off Steam. Just to be fair though, I was able to reset the activations on my brother's copy of Crysis after I decided to give it a whirl on my older computer.

#12
Dethateer

Dethateer
  • Members
  • 4 390 messages
Crysis doesn't have an activation limit.

#13
wollert

wollert
  • Members
  • 147 messages
Steam is only viable for older cheap games or if they offer a sick price, new games is not worth it because it´s more expensive than a physical copy and forces you to use a 3rd party software to run.



I usually buy from D2D if the price is similar and I dont want a physical case like a CE, just to avoid a couple of things that kills gaming;



Forced disc use - there is no excuse now a days, I refuse to accept the need to have a disc in my drive to play.

third party software - I do not want to install anything I do not choose to, I will not hide the fact I resort to no-dvd patches if I have to, whatever the complication it´s still better.



I even bought a second copy of ME2 to avoid using a disc and any of that bull, D2D only required inserting my code in a window and then it was done, I have no worries. But after seeing the ME2 DRM will require a disc I think I blew a fuse out my ear, after being so happy with ME1 1.02 patch removing the need of the DVD.



But hey, ANYTHING is better than Games For Windows Live..... satan IS walking amongst us.

#14
Varenus Luckmann

Varenus Luckmann
  • Members
  • 2 891 messages

DaveTheJackal wrote...
[...]

And yet the DRM whiners don't bother complaining steam games at all, they don't attempt to get a game low ratings, none of that nonsense.

[...]

I don't use Steam for that and many other reasons. Therefore I don't make a habit of complaining about it.

#15
Must have name

Must have name
  • Members
  • 134 messages
I have the Steam version. Partly because I got the game in the Christmas Sale for £3, but I was waiting for it there. I would never have bought the boxed version because of the DRM.



The difference is this. SecuRom penalises me. That, and it's there, hidden in my computer. Steam doesn't. I know exactly where it is, and what I have to do to get rid of it, and it offers me a service. I don't support games (at least single player games) enforcing Steam even with a boxed install, but i'm quite happy using Steam.

#16
AsheraII

AsheraII
  • Members
  • 1 856 messages
Steam doesn't come with a pretty booklet or CD inlay. The only advantage it has over pirate copies is that it's legal.

Yes, I like having my games sorted on a shelf, next to my books.

#17
Guest_Heartlocker_*

Guest_Heartlocker_*
  • Guests

AsheraII wrote...

Steam doesn't come with a pretty booklet or CD inlay. The only advantage it has over pirate copies is that it's legal.
Yes, I like having my games sorted on a shelf, next to my books.


Like having money in cash makes you realize what you have and a good reminder using a creditcard can be dangerous as you don't see oversee your money, in our case games, as something touchable. I like to own what I buy, not wanting to have the 'fear' some digital service can still screw me over and take over my copies.

#18
mcneil_1

mcneil_1
  • Members
  • 678 messages

Dethateer wrote...

Crysis doesn't have an activation limit.

Did your brother have the original game or the expansion (warhead) or the doublepack (maximum)?
Crysis itself didnt (not sure about later patches) but warhead and the maximum edition did have the notsonicerom included as a freebie :P

Modifié par mcneil_1, 05 mars 2010 - 10:25 .


#19
Dethateer

Dethateer
  • Members
  • 4 390 messages
You're talking to the wrong person.

#20
sirandar

sirandar
  • Members
  • 220 messages

DaveTheJackal wrote...

I really can't undersant all the comments about Mass Effect's DRM on amazon. What's to object about:

With secure ROM I get to install my software on multiple PCs.
After they relaxed the DRM on ME1, I could even lend it to 4 friends, had I chosen to, and they could play the game at the same time as me.
though there was a 5 activation limit, all it takes is a call to EA and, providing you're not obviously a villain, they'll supply new activations for you on demand.
Contrary to popular belief, I don't believe an actual root kit is installed.

Compare this to Steam.

With steam only one person can ever play a game at once.
I can never resell my games.
What's more, I don't own my games and should Valve decide to block my account for, say, cheating at CS:S or somesuch, I lose everything. Every game I have registered on steam is gone. It's not even like a rental, it's more like temporary permission to use the game.

And yet the DRM whiners don't bother complaining steam games at all, they don't attempt to get a game low ratings, none of that nonsense.

What is their problem? Is Valve behind it all? I think we should be told! :police:


They are probably ****ing because they can't find a hacked version yet and they want the game for free.

#21
DaveTheJackal

DaveTheJackal
  • Members
  • 238 messages
I wasn't particularly attacking steam, with it's higher than highstreet prices, from a company that sticks 5 poor multiplayer maps together, puts them in a box labelled left4dead, and calls it a full priced game, I was just wondering why the whiners weren't.

#22
Jonathan Shepard

Jonathan Shepard
  • Members
  • 2 056 messages
Steam is the worst thing ever. I hate it. I bought MW2 for my brother for Christmas. We want to play online. Oh, shiz. It uses steam, so now how are we going to play together? We own the game, don't we? So why can't we both play it at the same time?

SecuROM is much better. Thank you, OP, for having common sense. And? It's always cool to have the physical copy, because, in the case your OS crashes, you're screwed if you don't.

Modifié par Jonathan Shepard, 06 mars 2010 - 04:31 .


#23
mcneil_1

mcneil_1
  • Members
  • 678 messages

Dethateer wrote...

You're talking to the wrong person.

Sorry for some strange the forum quoted the wrong quote :huh:

#24
battleship potemkin village

battleship potemkin village
  • Members
  • 53 messages
SecuROM is an eff'n rootkit.

If I wanted to destabilize my PC I'd install Windows Vista.  Rootkits are a deal-breaker.  I won't install anything that effs up my computer.

Modifié par battleship potemkin village, 06 mars 2010 - 10:55 .


#25
RighteousRage

RighteousRage
  • Members
  • 1 043 messages

DaveTheJackal wrote...
With steam only one person can ever play a game at once.


No

I have played Steam games from the same account on three different computers at the same time before; all it takes is human intelligence and mid-level familiarity with Windows