The Reapers have to have been made...right?
#1
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 08:46
#2
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 08:50
#3
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 09:33
#4
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 01:32
#5
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 03:40
#6
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 03:57
#7
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 05:24
Modifié par Andorfiend, 06 mars 2010 - 05:25 .
#8
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 06:31
Andorfiend wrote...
hentai-class dreadnought.
LOL!
#9
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 02:16
The old machines probably started out looking very similar to their creators, but over time changed themselves to be better at what they do.
They are now at the point where they see themselves as gods, and are therefore free too look like anything they want, since they can like god create themselves in their own image, which is anything they can think of.
But since they are machines(mostly?!) their form should be determined by logic an efficiency, and so one may conclude that what they are at the moment is the most effective form to survive a million year space hibernation, and space travel.
This would also explain the revelations at the end of ME2:
spoiler warning!!! The reapers where defeated by the hands of humanity, humanity is taking control of the galaxy at an alarming rate, and not by playing nice.
reapers may have concluded that the human form is they ultimate form fore galactic conquest...
then again I might be wrong, and I hope bioware has a far better plot twist in mind:)
Modifié par dietrichrieper, 06 mars 2010 - 02:20 .
#10
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 04:39
#11
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 08:16
#12
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 01:29
RavenholmeCP42 wrote...
Reapers don't have to have been made, it could be a case of technological transcendence/sublimation (To use an Iain M Banks/Culture Term), that is to say, a race turned themselves into machines, the first ones built by the race as flesh organics, the others by their newly ascended brothers.
I'm sorry, but I don't grasp any appreciable difference between that scenario and the meaning of the word 'made'. Truly. To my mind the alternative to 'made' is spontaneous self-assembly or evolution from something that spontaneously self-assembled. Like us.
#13
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 12:13
dietrichrieper wrote...
They are now at the point where they see themselves as gods, and are therefore free too look like anything they want, since they can like god create themselves in their own image, which is anything they can think of.
But since they are machines(mostly?!) their form should be determined by logic an efficiency, and so one may conclude that what they are at the moment is the most effective form to survive a million year space hibernation, and space travel.
This would also explain the revelations at the end of ME2:
spoiler warning!!! The reapers where defeated by the hands of humanity, humanity is taking control of the galaxy at an alarming rate, and not by playing nice.
reapers may have concluded that the human form is they ultimate form fore galactic conquest...
then again I might be wrong, and I hope bioware has a far better plot twist in mind:)
I'm fairly convinced the Reapers see themselves as protectors of the Galaxy. In Tali's loyalty quest she mentions the dark matter accumulating in the sun. All tech is based off of reaper tech. And the use of this tech is accumulating too much DE (dark energy) and threatning the universe. The reapers need to destroy life to disengage the continued use of their tech which will evenvitably destroy the galaxy. This is why they do it every 50 000 years or so. Harbinger says he has to save them from themselves or something of the like.
Further, I think the Reapers became self aware, like the geth, and realized their former creators tech was accumulating too much DE and to protect the galaxy, destroyed their creators.
Modifié par mnfdsnjklfdslkfds, 07 mars 2010 - 12:17 .
#14
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 05:08
[/quote]
I'm fairly convinced the Reapers see themselves as protectors of the Galaxy. In Tali's loyalty quest she mentions the dark matter accumulating in the sun. All tech is based off of reaper tech. And the use of this tech is accumulating too much DE (dark energy) and threatning the universe. The reapers need to destroy life to disengage the continued use of their tech which will evenvitably destroy the galaxy. This is why they do it every 50 000 years or so. Harbinger says he has to save them from themselves or something of the like.
Further, I think the Reapers became self aware, like the geth, and realized their former creators tech was accumulating too much DE and to protect the galaxy, destroyed their creators.
[/quote]
That’s an awesome idea! sort of like the spirit of the forest, only on a galactic scale, and it touches upon a lot of modern day subject, like renewable energy and global warming, and it would explain why reapers want us to evolve along certain guided paths.
Then again why if, this is their reason for being, would they allow any form of 'life' they themselves are dependant on DE, and if they are the guardians of the galaxy, shouldn’t they realize they are putting of the inevitable?
and shouldn’t they accept the fact that the galaxy will eventually end?
believing that the gallaxy eventualy will end, compels the belief that the galaxy eventually will start,,,, like the reapers cycle suggests...hmm:huh:I'm confused...
#15
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 05:41
#16
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 05:47
Andorfiend wrote...
RavenholmeCP42 wrote...
Reapers don't have to have been made, it could be a case of technological transcendence/sublimation (To use an Iain M Banks/Culture Term), that is to say, a race turned themselves into machines, the first ones built by the race as flesh organics, the others by their newly ascended brothers.
I'm sorry, but I don't grasp any appreciable difference between that scenario and the meaning of the word 'made'. Truly. To my mind the alternative to 'made' is spontaneous self-assembly or evolution from something that spontaneously self-assembled. Like us.
By that definition, everything was "made." I think the implied difference in the context of this thread is that the Reapers' supposed creators were beings completely separate from themselves, the difference between the quarian and the geth, or a human and a sentient microwave, who rebelled or somesuch. While what Ravenholme - I think - is saying that that wasn't so much the case as the "creators" modified themselves gradually and to the point that they ascended to a reaper state.
I guess it's a thin (or even transparent) line, but it's an important one.
Modifié par Schroing, 07 mars 2010 - 05:49 .
#17
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 08:10
#18
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 08:33
#19
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 08:44
Andorfiend wrote...
Ah. Well then yes I agree that the reapers were not so much designed by their creators as derived from them. However I don't think that's what the OP meant when she posed her question. And I agree with her as well that the Reapers had to be 'made' because a creature of steel, circuits and batteries cannot spontaneously arise the way a being of flesh and blood (or at least protoplasm and protein) can.
Well...
I'll be 100% honest...I'm not too caught up with the mass effect lore.
Since the Reapers are a mechanical AI race doesn't that mean that
someone created them at one point in time? If i'm totally off base on
this feel free to tell me.
The OP used both the words "AI" and "created," so I think what he/she's saying is -exactly- the question of whether the Reapers were or weren't, essentially, robots (helpers?) along the lines of the geth.
And...well, first of all, if we're going to be picky about word choice here, it should really be noted that nothing on the scale we're discussing "spontaneously arises," so far as we know. Life didn't just pop up out of the ocean, it was essentially the result of a specific mix of, what's the word...chemicals? Elements? Whatever. There was a cause, and there was an effect.
It should also be noted that Reapers are not creatures of steel, circuits, and batteries, they're creatures of steel, circuits, batteries, flesh, and blood. Maybe not specifically, but more or less they're a combination of organic and inorganic material (as they're often referred to in-game). What this thread is discussing is the exact nature of how that came to be; did they begin as machines who began to harvest organics for whatever reason, thus becoming as they are, as the OP is under the impression of, or did they begin as biological beings who altered their makeup to become what they are?
The question of whether or not they were specifically "made" is ultimately philosophical and thus answerless, coming down to the definition of evolution itself in the context of technology.
...Rambly rambly rambly.
#20
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 08:46
#21
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 08:49
TheLostGenius wrote...
If you get 100% of the Keeper scans, Chorban emails you in ME2 and tells you that after he studied the wreckage of Soverign and compared it to the keeper scans, he knows that "whoever made the Keepers also made the Reapers". Which is a pivotal revelation that SOMETHING is behind the Reaper menace.
Yes...the reapers themselves. Chorban isn't aware that Sovereign was a reaper; he refers to it specifically as a "flagship." He's under the impression that it's not a creature, but, well, just a ship, crafted in the same way that any other ship in the ME2 universe would be.
The reapers, obviously, bioengineered the Protheans into the Collectors in much the same way - if he ran similar scans on the Collectors, he'd have come to the same conclusion (that they have a common creator) while we all know which one made the other.
#22
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 08:49
TheLostGenius wrote...
It's revealed in ME2 that the Reapers were in fact created.
By other reapers. See above post.
#23
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 09:12
Schroing wrote...
TheLostGenius wrote...
If you get 100% of the Keeper scans, Chorban emails you in ME2 and tells you that after he studied the wreckage of Soverign and compared it to the keeper scans, he knows that "whoever made the Keepers also made the Reapers". Which is a pivotal revelation that SOMETHING is behind the Reaper menace.
Yes...the reapers themselves. Chorban isn't aware that Sovereign was a reaper; he refers to it specifically as a "flagship." He's under the impression that it's not a creature, but, well, just a ship, crafted in the same way that any other ship in the ME2 universe would be.
The reapers, obviously, bioengineered the Protheans into the Collectors in much the same way - if he ran similar scans on the Collectors, he'd have come to the same conclusion (that they have a common creator) while we all know which one made the other.
No. He specifically states the Reapers and the Keepers share the same creators. He knew Soverign was a Reaper and says no one on the citadel will listen to him. Apparently you did not earn that email, and have no idea what you are talking about. :innocent:
#24
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 09:17
TheLostGenius wrote...
Schroing wrote...
TheLostGenius wrote...
If you get 100% of the Keeper scans, Chorban emails you in ME2 and tells you that after he studied the wreckage of Soverign and compared it to the keeper scans, he knows that "whoever made the Keepers also made the Reapers". Which is a pivotal revelation that SOMETHING is behind the Reaper menace.
Yes...the reapers themselves. Chorban isn't aware that Sovereign was a reaper; he refers to it specifically as a "flagship." He's under the impression that it's not a creature, but, well, just a ship, crafted in the same way that any other ship in the ME2 universe would be.
The reapers, obviously, bioengineered the Protheans into the Collectors in much the same way - if he ran similar scans on the Collectors, he'd have come to the same conclusion (that they have a common creator) while we all know which one made the other.
No. He specifically states the Reapers and the Keepers share the same creators. He knew Soverign was a Reaper and says no one on the citadel will listen to him. Apparently you did not earn that email, and have no idea what you are talking about. :innocent:
From: Chorban
I hope this address still works. I promised to send you intel on the
keepers if I found anything, and this is important. See, those scans
you took? It turns out the keepers are bio-engineered...and based on my
comparisons to some of that material from Saren's flagship Sovereign, they were engineered millions of years ago...by the same people who made Sovereign!
You may not understand how important this is, but it suggests that the Citadel wasn't really made by the Protheans! It may have been made by something far older,
with the keepers as organic guardians. And what's more, based on my
genetic readings, they're supposed to react to...something, some signal
or something...about every 50 thousand years. You can measure genetic
variances; it's a bit like comparing rings on a tree to see the drought
years.
Whoever did this...well, around the last time this signal went off
would be around the time the Protheans disappeared. And it's scheduled
to go off sometime around now. If any old tech still works, they could
have some nasty surprises waiting for us.
Just thought you'd want to know. Nobody here on the Citadel will listen to me.
-Chorban
Read it carefully, then read what I said carefully, then read it again.
#25
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 09:41
Schroing wrote...
TheLostGenius wrote...
Schroing wrote...
TheLostGenius wrote...
If you get 100% of the Keeper scans, Chorban emails you in ME2 and tells you that after he studied the wreckage of Soverign and compared it to the keeper scans, he knows that "whoever made the Keepers also made the Reapers". Which is a pivotal revelation that SOMETHING is behind the Reaper menace.
Yes...the reapers themselves. Chorban isn't aware that Sovereign was a reaper; he refers to it specifically as a "flagship." He's under the impression that it's not a creature, but, well, just a ship, crafted in the same way that any other ship in the ME2 universe would be.
The reapers, obviously, bioengineered the Protheans into the Collectors in much the same way - if he ran similar scans on the Collectors, he'd have come to the same conclusion (that they have a common creator) while we all know which one made the other.
No. He specifically states the Reapers and the Keepers share the same creators. He knew Soverign was a Reaper and says no one on the citadel will listen to him. Apparently you did not earn that email, and have no idea what you are talking about. :innocent:
From: Chorban
I hope this address still works. I promised to send you intel on the
keepers if I found anything, and this is important. See, those scans
you took? It turns out the keepers are bio-engineered...and based on my
comparisons to some of that material from Saren's flagship Sovereign, they were engineered millions of years ago...by the same people who made Sovereign!
You may not understand how important this is, but it suggests that the Citadel wasn't really made by the Protheans! It may have been made by something far older,
with the keepers as organic guardians. And what's more, based on my
genetic readings, they're supposed to react to...something, some signal
or something...about every 50 thousand years. You can measure genetic
variances; it's a bit like comparing rings on a tree to see the drought
years.
Whoever did this...well, around the last time this signal went off
would be around the time the Protheans disappeared. And it's scheduled
to go off sometime around now. If any old tech still works, they could
have some nasty surprises waiting for us.
Just thought you'd want to know. Nobody here on the Citadel will listen to me.
-Chorban
Read it carefully, then read what I said carefully, then read it again.
Yes, and Soverign is a Reaper, and his study concluded that they were created by the same beings that created the Keepers. Whats not to get?





Retour en haut






