jlb524 wrote...
That's my point. Objectively, all these romances are the same. The male options could be the best romances ever written and some (including myself) still aren't going to like them just b/c they're male. I want to play a romance that reflects who I am (a lesbian) hence I can't get into the straight ones with either a dudeShep or femShep.
Nobody is asking you to like the male romances, though. It's fine to not like them because they're male and you're simply not interested in males. What is
not fine is looking for reasons to prop up your disinterest and harping on how awful the male romances and/or male characters are because they have the gall (the GALL!) to not have ovaries.
Maybe I'm not explaining my point well. There is a difference between this:
"I'm not interested in men, so the male romances don't appeal to me. Not my taste."
And this:
"I'm not interested in men, so the male romances and characters suck and are awful and I will persist in belittling and complaining about them indefinitely. FUUU THANE/JACOB/GARRUS ARE SUCH TOOLS THEIR ROMANCES ARE TOOLS FUUUUU FUUUU BOOBS."
The former is not liking something for genuine, honest reasons. There is no need to prop up your dislike with extraneous nonsense.
The latter is propping up your dislike with extraneous and irrelevant nonsense. You don't have to like or dislike something at the expense of something else. It's like you're trying to justify your dislike of the male romances when you don't need to.
(When I say "you/your" I don't mean you, jlb!)
Yes, but there are actual bisexual and gay women who want these options as well.
I know, that's why I said "most."
Modifié par IccaRa, 07 mars 2010 - 10:33 .