Are the Reapers good? Theory time :D
#251
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 07:46
#252
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 07:46
#253
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 07:46
#254
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 07:47
Modifié par Dave the Seagull, 06 mars 2010 - 07:47 .
#255
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 07:47
The Angry One wrote...
My final post on the matter because some people are just being obtuse and jerking around, but as for this.superimposed wrote...
Wrong again. They are advanced enough to live and thrive in their environments. We, however, keep having to 'advance' - constantly battling the environment and ourselves, creatures have conquered - with their natural bodies - what took us millenia to work towards. Flying, deep sea exploration, and we still aren't even close to seeing what is an everyday life for them. Things like Sonar and Radar pre-existed human invention. Anything humanity has invented can already be found in the natural environment, yes even explosives.
You don't get it do you? Of course technology replicates what nature does. The point is it replicates what humans can't do naturally! Animals have no need to but the fact remains they don't understand it.
What makes you say that? An eagle knows what flight is, a dog knows what scents are, a whale knows what diving is.
It's not a matter of understanding or comprehension, but fact. They have absolutely no reason to understand it. It's a matter of biology.
And for all this trumpeting of humanity's advancement you seem to forget that the biggest threat to humanity is itself, as a direct result of our advancement.
That's right, we could be first and only species on the planet to consciously wipe ourselves out.
#256
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 07:47
#257
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 07:48
#258
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 07:50
#259
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 07:50
I have no counter to the fact they dont understand our technology while we are able to understand Reapers. That is a good way to define worthyness and equality.The Angry One wrote...
My final post on the matter because some people are just being obtuse and jerking around, but as for this.superimposed wrote...
Wrong again. They are advanced enough to live and thrive in their environments. We, however, keep having to 'advance' - constantly battling the environment and ourselves, creatures have conquered - with their natural bodies - what took us millenia to work towards. Flying, deep sea exploration, and we still aren't even close to seeing what is an everyday life for them. Things like Sonar and Radar pre-existed human invention. Anything humanity has invented can already be found in the natural environment, yes even explosives.
You don't get it do you? Of course technology replicates what nature does. The point is it replicates what humans can't do naturally! Animals have no need to but the fact remains they don't understand it.
It was nice talking with you. Thank you.
#260
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 07:53
#261
Guest_Captain Cornhole_*
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 08:08
Guest_Captain Cornhole_*
Every 50,000 years plus some how the whole Universe will explode killing everyone and everything for the rest of time and the only way to stop it is for the Reapers to kill every living thing in the Gallaxy. Thus saveing the Universe and preserving it for other spceies to come, live their lives etc. Then be killed. That would be justifyable.
#262
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 08:32
#263
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 08:36
reminds me of stargate. defeat gould snake thingies, face the replicators. kill replicators, face ori. kill ori, face wraith. Makes you want to stay on one planet...Miqti wrote...
Or there are other species at the level of the Reapers - or greater - against which the Reapers are preparing. If we are able to defeat the Reapers, then we may enter the extragalactic stage. Whether humans are the predominant Milky Way force or we face these other threats as a coaltion, we may have to face threats that the Reapers did.
#264
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 08:39
#265
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 08:42
This.Big_Choppa wrote...
They want to kill me and I intend to finish them off first. This is survival, not an ethics contest!
They could be angels. They still want to wipe out all life in the galaxy.
Untill we know more, they are an enemy to be defeated, not an evil to be smited.
#266
Guest_Captain Cornhole_*
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 08:59
Guest_Captain Cornhole_*
#267
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 09:16
Captain Cornhole wrote...
Lol Angles don't wipe out gallaxies, I think you mean demons.
Read the Bible.
#268
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 11:23
Vaenier wrote...
This.Big_Choppa wrote...
They want to kill me and I intend to finish them off first. This is survival, not an ethics contest!
They could be angels. They still want to wipe out all life in the galaxy.
Untill we know more, they are an enemy to be defeated, not an evil to be smited.
Precisely. They might be doing what they must to survive and we're doing what we must to survive. They are the enemy and they are to be defeated if 'we' are to live. I'm not one to sit down and let them massacre us.
P.S. - This is an awesome thread, really.
#269
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 11:32
#270
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 11:41
#271
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 11:46
#272
Posté 06 mars 2010 - 11:52
#273
Posté 07 mars 2010 - 02:16
InvaderErl wrote...
Captain Cornhole wrote...
Lol Angles don't wipe out gallaxies, I think you mean demons.
Read the Bible.
Yeah man. It's true.
If the bible were even remotely based on fact, then man's worst enemy would be OT god and his penchant for genocide.





Retour en haut







