Cerberus IS part of the Alliance. It never went "rogue". [WITH PROOF]
#701
Posté 05 mars 2011 - 01:58
#702
Posté 05 mars 2011 - 02:33
According to the lore Cerberus is using a company called Cord-Hislop Aerospace as a front to fund their activities. That company is a well-respected corporation for manufacturing and selling starships.
I remember a thread on the old forums in which we discussed the change of the Cerberus logo. Someone believed that the new logo was actually used by Cord-Hislop Aerospace before the change. I was not sure about this, though. I was unable to find proof of that, although it was obvious that there was a Cerberus logo change. Later I thought that might explain a video in which someone with a Cerberus logo on his uniform talks to Anderson. You can watch that on video at the Shadow Broker's base. That might be a (connection to) his son (Jason), who apparently became an aerospace engineer. You can read about that in a dossier which contains a letter sent to Anderson by his wife Cynthia Barris. The letter was send from Atlanta, Earth, and Cord-Hislop Aerospace happens to have their headquarters on Earth. Jason might be working for them. The guy in the uniform can be either Anderson's son or someone working for Cord-Hislop Aerospace with information about his son.
The Cerberus logo change makes sense because nobody is really upset by individuals wearing uniforms with that logo in public. The logo is a cover for TIM's organization and they have just adapted the Cord-Hislop Aerospace logo after Cerberus went rogue. Just look at the ingame ME1 Cerberus logo. They don't even look remotely the same.
If Cord-Hislop Aerospace is a respected company then they may have been the builders of the SR-1. The Turian collaboration on that project does not contradict that. The lore mentioned "co-development" and not that the Turians actually built it. Even if they did Cord-Hislop Aerospace might have been closely involved in its development. That may also explain why Cerberus was able to use much of the same technology of the SR-1. Cerberus didn't have to go after it. They already had it. Because of its role for Cerberus the same company is most likely to be the builder of the SR-2.
Edited this post several times in the hope to make it more clear.
Edit: I confused Hackett with Kahoku and corrected that.
Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 05 mars 2011 - 04:14 .
#703
Posté 05 mars 2011 - 05:42
#704
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 12:08
What you say does seem highly probable, but i still like the idea of a Grass Roots Organization like Cerebus, making their own way among the inter galactic community apart from human government aid premission or sponsorship.Because it is only inevitable: At some point, the colonies (some, not all) may seek to declare their independence from whomever sponsors them.After all, that's what happened in the 'New World' (America).For some time now i have thought that history will repeat itself, whenever we finally get around to colonizing the planet Mars...
#705
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 12:39
Lol, you haven't read the latest comic, have you? I mean, you'd know that Ashley's Grandpa... ...ubermensch007 wrote...
A very fascinating topic of discussion... Zulu DFA: Your theory adds a level of political intrigue worthy of the Mass Effect Universe! In a way you make Cerebus come across as the inverse of SD-6 (from Alias) They pretended to be a branch of the C.I.A. In your essay, Cerebus is pretending to not be a part of the Systems Alliance.My God! I almost want what you are saying to be true, just to see how Operations Cheif: Ashley Williams, would react if she found out that the Alliance was in bed with the organization that she loathes.Saying that she would feel betrayed and disenchanted, may not do it justice.Poor thing...After all, her father and grandfather put up with in the Alliance, your theory if correct, would add insult to injury, in her case.
Um, let's say she'd be shocked about him too.
But that kinda already happened, when the Systems Alliance formed its own government at the Acturus Station. So, I guess, TIM's "vision" and "cause" of finding a proper place for the Mankind among the stars does not necessarilly involve independence from the Alliance, as opposed to shaping this still new and pliable quasi-nation to suit that goal best.ubermensch007 wrote...
What you say does seem highly probable, but i still like the idea of a Grass Roots Organization like Cerebus, making their own way among the inter galactic community apart from human government aid premission or sponsorship.Because it is only inevitable: At some point, the colonies (some, not all) may seek to declare their independence from whomever sponsors them.After all, that's what happened in the 'New World' (America).For some time now i have thought that history will repeat itself, whenever we finally get around to colonizing the planet Mars...
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 06 mars 2011 - 12:43 .
#706
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 01:59
Thing is... don't they have enough "back-door" options? Spectres, etc.?
Unless divided loyalties within the Council led to the creation of several such operations.
#707
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 02:52
Lord_Metal666 wrote...
Actually it does sound very plausable.<br />
<br />
How else would they get the plans to the Normandy, and Anderson did find out you were alive far to quickly for my liking.<br />
<br />
It has already been stated in the game that Cerberus is funded by certain high placed civilian pers, and high ranking Alliance military personal. I'm thinking Cerberus is to the Systems Alliance, what the CIA is to the US government. <br />
<br />
The CIA analogy doesn't work. The CIA is not considered "rogue" to the US. Cerberus, according to what Admiral Kahoku told us before he was assassinated, is rogue to the Alliance.
This is an interesting theory, although improbable.
#708
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 03:06
#709
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 03:22
Also another example of my previous theory would be that if you do the Kahoku mission before Toombs, Toombs explains that he escapes because somebody "destroyed Cerberus".
#710
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 03:25
Assuming that some of the research projects being explored by Cerberus in ME we in fact sanctioned by Cerberus and weren't just started by a rogue element, that would mean that Cerberus was exploring everything from the effects of Thresher Maw acid to Rachni behavior to mind control (Thorian Creepers). The idea of having a secretive organization like Cerberus having access to mind control technology doesn't strike me as a good idea. Consider TIM's backers, if you're feeling absolutely loyal to TIM. Why would you deliver such technology to a corporation? What good could possibly come from that? The same thing goes for anything else Cerberus gets involved with.
During my Paragon playthroughs, these are things I considered when making my Cerberus-related decisions. A member of Cerberus may be good and honorable. But the organization itself seems to be run by people who may not care about the good of the human race, much less the galaxy's. Even TIM, who may also turn out to be honorable, may just be a puppet, all the while falsely believing that he's actually in control.
#711
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 03:26
#712
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 03:32
#713
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 03:35
MajorStranger wrote...
Cerberus was never part of the System Alliance special operation. They are a privately funded human supremacist group that believe the System Alliance is not able to protect the interest of Humanity. Their whole purpose is based on the fact people view the alliance as too weak to represent the human race. Therefore Zulu would you mind stop with you idiotic Nostadamus Theories?
Why are you insulting the guy? man, I hate people in these forums who blindly hate Cerberus and anyone who sides of defends them. If it wasn't form them, Humanity would be in the brink of extincyion with who knows what else. We owe Cerberus everything, so YOU shut up and or stick to the discussion. What a jerk.....
Modifié par Pwener2313, 06 mars 2011 - 03:36 .
#714
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 03:45
#715
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 03:46
Pwener2313 wrote...
That's something I never understood. Cerberus isn't destroyed, they're super advanced technologically and made a Normandy. How was it destroyed then? Was it a single cell?
Like I said earlier:
My guess is this: during ME 1 they used Cerberus as a minor side-mission evil group that was in fact a rougue Human black ops group or whatever. Then the writers saw the potential in the group and decided to reuse the name for ME 2; also this would have been a nice way to have shown the group in ME 1, albeit briefly so the haracter can have some history with them. Notice how there is no mention of Toombs or your Akuze squad for the sole survivor to Miranda or TIM or anybody: my guess is that they hadn't intended for Cerberus to be the group from ME 2 so they decided to ignore that side plot.
Maybe Cerberus will end up being with the Alliance. However I don't think that was the plan from the beginning: more than likely I see it as Cerberus having been a random side villian for the first game that was originally destroyed in the Kohoku mission. Which would also make sense as they pretty much gloss over all of the Cerberus side missions in the first game, and you never even mention Toombs or Kohoku.
Modifié par nevar00, 06 mars 2011 - 03:47 .
#716
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 03:50
#717
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 03:52
#718
Guest_lewdvig_*
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 03:55
Guest_lewdvig_*
Fiery Phoenix wrote...
Cerberus was just a Chekhov's Gun in ME1.
I had to look it up:
Chekhov's gun is a literary technique whereby an element is introduced early in the story, but its significance does not become clear until later in the narrative. The concept is named after Russian playwright Anton Chekhov, who mentioned several variants of the concept in letters. Chekhov himself makes use of this principle in Uncle Vanya, in which a pistol is introduced early on as a seemingly irrelevant prop and, towards the end of the play, becomes much more important as Uncle Vanya, in a rage, grabs it and tries to commit homicide.The phrase "Chekhov's gun" is often interpreted as a method of foreshadowing, but the concept can also be interpreted as meaning "do not include any unnecessary elements in a story." Failure to observe the rule of "Chekhov's gun" may be cited by critics when discussing plot holes.
#719
Guest_lewdvig_*
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 03:57
Guest_lewdvig_*
#720
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 04:03
Pwener2313 wrote...
@nevar00: The ME story was done since before ME1 was even out. Cerberus was planned to become a major player since the start.
I realize that but I'm not sure they were originally supposed to be the 'pro-human extremist group' for the 2nd game... they just seem like two completely different organizations from what we find out in ME 1 and they completely ignore things we learned about them in the first game.
#721
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 04:03
MajorStranger wrote...
I sticked to the discussion: But the Fact is that Cerberus was not some kind of Commissioned black ops divsion created by the Alliance. They were created by rich bored guys who didn't feel the Alliance was strong enough to keep their investment protected from other species.
Are you for real? You're the one making idiotic theories. please, make yourself a favor and leave, your unresonable and lack of proof theories are very bad. The funny thing is that you say it like it's common knowledge. Your a sad little person, I can tell. You hate Cerberus, I get it, and now leave and stop mucking up the thread.
#722
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 04:06
nevar00 wrote...
Pwener2313 wrote...
@nevar00: The ME story was done since before ME1 was even out. Cerberus was planned to become a major player since the start.
I realize that but I'm not sure they were originally supposed to be the 'pro-human extremist group' for the 2nd game... they just seem like two completely different organizations from what we find out in ME 1 and they completely ignore things we learned about them in the first game.
Ignore? Miranda discusses Shepard's exploits against Cerberus from ME1 and Tali too. that cell we fought in ME1 was researching ways to make disposable shock troops to fight the Geth and protect human colonies. are you sure you imported from ME1?
#723
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 04:18
Zulu_DFA wrote...
applehug wrote...
That just proves the Alliance high comand is extremely inefficent.
This is BS. USMC generals would never abandon a platoon of marines, just because they are lasy. They would abandon a platoon of marines, if some civil suit approached them and told that a search&rescue mission may not be in the best interests of the USMC. Even then, it's possible that some general would investigate the matter privately (like Kahoku did). It's probable that in this case such general would have a heart attack all of a sudden.
Look at it this way: Cerberus is rogue. Cerberus is supported by MIC interests. Cerberus has either backers or infiltrators at all levels of the Alliance. That's right. Alliance has generals and admirals in it's ranks that are working with Cerberus. So, of course Kahoku's request for aid or information with regards to his men could easily get intercepted and go unanswered. This doesn't mean that the Alliance is "corporate security" or "defends corporate interests". In fact, it implies that Cerberus is every bit as screwed up and rogue as people believe it is. It's being backed by defense contractors, and probably some high ranking military types that want to take the fight to any and all alien races. Blindly defending Cerberus is actually kind of pointless. If you want to side with them, fine. That's your business. It just seems that the pro-Cerberus camp is going out of it's way to explain why "in the bigger picture" selling your soul is a good thing.
#724
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 04:25
#725
Posté 06 mars 2011 - 04:26
Hackett obviously has his own way of doing things. So, if he fed Cerberus information then he did it on his own agenda. The Cerberus/TIM story is quite well known and there's nothing to indicate they are a super secret part of the Alliance.





Retour en haut





