90 réponses à ce sujet

[Borschtbeet]

Game Informer has got to be the worst game publication ever written.  The only reason it has lasted so long is because of it's subscription deal with Gamestop.  Even Gamepro back when it had it's stupid little smiley face ratings was a better read than this monthly trash.

There are only two kinds of gamers who read Game Informer.  Emos and fat chicks.  Therefore we can dismiss the 70 something percent rating it gave to Dragon Age Awakening.

Dragon Age Awakening will be a great game.  Game Informer's reviews have never been on the right side of history and I doubt anything is going to change now.

Modifié par Borschtbeet, 09 mars 2010 - 09:30 .

[wcholcombe]

you started a completely new thread for this?



Not that I disagree, but you couldn't say this in the other thread?

[DarthCaine]

@ Borschtbeet
I told you I'd be back lol

Modifié par DarthCaine, 09 mars 2010 - 09:31 .

[Osena109]

Borchineet what did Game informer say about DAO:A?

[Borschtbeet]

Osena109 wrote...

Borchineet what did Game informer say about DAO:A?

I don't know, I've only seen the score.  Doesn't matter though because anyone who trashes a Bioware game is a chode licker.

[Haasth]

Osena109 wrote...

Borchineet what did Game informer say about DAO:A?

I second this question.
Do tell, do tell! 

[Borschtbeet]

wcholcombe wrote...

you started a completely new thread for this?

Not that I disagree, but you couldn't say this in the other thread?

Yes because that thread was an objective look at the review.  This thread isn't objective.  It's about how that review is BS and anyone who dissagrees is ghey.

[Osena109]

Borschtbeet wrote...

Osena109 wrote...

Borchineet what did Game informer say about DAO:A?

I don't know, I've only seen the score.  Doesn't matter though because anyone who trashes a Bioware game is a chode licker.

 that some nice logic you got there  but it would be nice if you could link the fan's deside

[Borschtbeet]

Osena109 wrote...

Borschtbeet wrote...

Osena109 wrote...

Borchineet what did Game informer say about DAO:A?

I don't know, I've only seen the score.  Doesn't matter though because anyone who trashes a Bioware game is a chode licker.

 that some nice logic you got there  but it would be nice if you could link the fan's deside

If you question Bioware's talent, then you obviously are not a fan.  

[Bryy_Miller]

Borschtbeet wrote...

wcholcombe wrote...

you started a completely new thread for this?

Not that I disagree, but you couldn't say this in the other thread?

Yes because that thread was an objective look at the review.  This thread isn't objective.  It's about how that review is BS and anyone who dissagrees is ghey.

You know what is homosexual? This line of reasoning. That is pretty homosexual.

[gemc123]

Wow, a thread where you AREN'T talking about 'scrogging' a character. I never thought I'd see the day.

[Greifvogel]

Osena109 wrote...

Borschtbeet wrote...

Osena109 wrote...

Borchineet what did Game informer say about DAO:A?

I don't know, I've only seen the score.  Doesn't matter though because anyone who trashes a Bioware game is a chode licker.

 that some nice logic you got there  but it would be nice if you could link the fan's deside

I don't think a proper link was ever given. Check out page 2:
http://social.biowar...7/index/1624155

so... /thread?

Modifié par Greifvogel, 09 mars 2010 - 09:39 .

[Dichotomize]

Who cares about the Game Informer review?!

I don't.

[Osena109]

Greifvogel wrote...

Osena109 wrote...

Borschtbeet wrote...

Osena109 wrote...

Borchineet what did Game informer say about DAO:A?

I don't know, I've only seen the score.  Doesn't matter though because anyone who trashes a Bioware game is a chode licker.

 that some nice logic you got there  but it would be nice if you could link the fan's deside

I don't think a proper link was ever given. Check out page 2:
http://social.biowar...7/index/1624155

so... /thread?

Why thank you vary much for the link

[Mr.Skar]

Since I have already planned to buy this game, no, I don't care. But reviews don't quite mean the same to me that they used to ya know? They used to actually influence my decisions now they just make me take a closer look at things I never planned on buying. The only time a review will really change my mind is if it brings up how filled with bugs a title is. But then I just wait a bit.

[worksa8]

I might have agreed with out Borschtbeet, you have a reason- but your logic and the way your handling this is just terrible. They made their review, and to be honest, I agree with some things they said. So far this is looking like it is going to disappoint, but I really REALLY hope I'm wrong.



"Also revealed in the review; no new mage hats to make you look better, and no Origin story for the new Orlesian Commander.."

"Maybe a 15-hour adventure isn't enough time to dig into these concepts"



Still, the review was incredibly amateur- so I can't really take it seriously. Only problem I have with the game is a few issues with the game in terms of lacking content and things that should have been looked at- but were ignored.

[drunken pyromaniac]

Eli-da-Mage wrote...

gemc123 wrote...

Wow, a thread where you AREN'T talking about 'scrogging' a character. I never thought I'd see the day.

No scrogging but hes already mentioned homosexuals , emotional hardcores and overweight females.

Maybe it's time for the racial slurs.

[Challseus]

Borschtbeet wrote...
...There are only two kinds of gamers who read Game Informer.  Emos and fat chicks...

Well, I'm a guy, so I guess that means I'm... Emo? What is emo again? *Shrug*

Anyway, score doesn't mean anything without the review text itself.

EDIT - Nevermind, just read the review. Meh, it seemed fair enough to me. Not enough to stop me from getting it...

Modifié par Challseus, 09 mars 2010 - 09:57 .

[The Real Fletch Fletcher]

Hey, what's going on in this thr-



*backs out of door*

[Nic-V]

The score is 7.5. There's something seriously wrong with you guys if you think that's bad. 7 or higher usually means good and good is... Well it's good! XD

[Greifvogel]

Please don't feed the troll.

[Borschtbeet]

worksa8 wrote...

I might have agreed with out Borschtbeet, you have a reason- but your logic and the way your handling this is just terrible. They made their review, and to be honest, I agree with some things they said. So far this is looking like it is going to disappoint, but I really REALLY hope I'm wrong.

"Also revealed in the review; no new mage hats to make you look better, and no Origin story for the new Orlesian Commander.."
"Maybe a 15-hour adventure isn't enough time to dig into these concepts"

Still, the review was incredibly amateur- so I can't really take it seriously. Only problem I have with the game is a few issues with the game in terms of lacking content and things that should have been looked at- but were ignored.

If you agree with anything Game Informer says it means you're stupid.  Even Nintendo Power has better reviews.

[Mr.Skar]

Greifvogel wrote...

Please don't feed the troll.

But it's Borschtbeet, he's a tad bit more entertaining than the usual troll .