GothamLord wrote...
EA/BioWare sees no money what-so-ever on the sale of used games. But I guess screwing the developers, the publishers and all the other people involved in getting the game on the shelf is okay ,so long as we can save 10 bucks at most from the used price that GameStop stamps on it at this point in time. You as a gamer are not supporing them getting the game used, you are supporing the used game industry and nothing else.
So what!
No company recieves money from used sales of their products unless they are actually in the used sales market. Why the hell should gaming be an exception?
They get their money from the new game market and DLC.
And having customers without LIVE or internet connection isnt screwing them as well? They are losing part of their customer base to try and market to for those that don't have some sort of web access. But I guess its okay to screw companies by taking away a portion of their consumer base.
With the internet still be classifed as a luxury in the States, yes.
If the customers don't have the interent they are not part of the DLC customer base, but still get still get functionally treated as pirates.
The games original content does not change without the DLC. It functions just fine without it. The Mass Effect 2 experience is still there. The DLC adds onto it and expands it. Not having it doesnt screw anyone. You got the game you paid for originally. I know as a gamer I dont feel screwed by the addition of DLC be it free or paid.
The content does get changes. Even a BW guy came in and said the content at the time was not ready so it caught cut. Prior to DLC if the content like completing the Dirty Dozen or providing promised vehicular combat weren't done then the game pushed back(sadly) until x and y, if important enough got done.
With DLC it brings the benefits to developers of
cutting content that is not done only to provide it as DLC.
The current DLC up until Kasumi feels to me like completion of the planned game from E3 09 not adding to it but completing.