1809 réponses à ce sujet

[diskoh]

ReconTeam wrote...

diskoh wrote...

[*]Again, I didn't invent the definition. Most dictionaries say "fear or dislike." If you don't like the definition, write a letter to have it changed so you can feel better about being a bigot.

[*]For God's sake take some classes at a community college or something. A phobia is a medical condition, it is not just a fear or dislike of anything. Disliking spiders does not make me an arachonophobe. If I paniced, froze and broke out into a cold sweat when I saw a spider, then I would have a phobia.

So start your own dictionary with your definition. Because all of the major ones support mine.

Modifié par diskoh, 12 mars 2010 - 06:42 .

[thegreateski]

diskoh wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

You are aware that dictionaries are changed on a routine basis yes?

That's a weak argument. The consensus of every major dictionary in the world that I have found supports my point. That is the correct definition of the word.

You're entitled to think otherwise, but you'd be wrong.

It's not an argument I'm just pointing that out.

Please don't assume things.

[Varenus Luckmann]

diskoh wrote...

thegreateski wrote...
You are aware that dictionaries are changed on a routine basis yes?

That's a weak argument. The consensus of every major dictionary in the world that I have found supports my point. That is the correct definition of the word.

You're entitled to think otherwise, but you'd be wrong.

I find it hilarious that you're willing to state that it's the consensus of every major dictionary in the world, when you appear to have the linguistic capabilities of a hopped-up newt.

[tripehound1]

diskoh wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

You are aware that dictionaries are changed on a routine basis yes?

That's a weak argument. The consensus of every major dictionary in the world that I have found supports my point. That is the correct definition of the word.

You're entitled to think otherwise, but you'd be wrong.

no no NO! the dictionary was changed 15 minutes ago! didn't you get the email? /sarcasm

serious: lol yeah weakest argument ever "well they might of changed it!" XD

[Massadonious1]

Who says you aren't frothing at the mouth or breaking into cold sweats when you write your replies, hmm?

[Ryzaki]

...and we've reached personal attacks.

Yup. This thread is officially pointless now.

...and I noticed how my Asari are females point was conspicously ignored.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 12 mars 2010 - 06:43 .

[diskoh]

thegreateski wrote...

diskoh wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

You are aware that dictionaries are changed on a routine basis yes?

That's a weak argument. The consensus of every major dictionary in the world that I have found supports my point. That is the correct definition of the word.

You're entitled to think otherwise, but you'd be wrong.

It's not an argument I'm just pointing that out.

Please don't assume things.

See, you're still arguing. You're out of control at this point.

[thegreateski]

diskoh wrote...

ReconTeam wrote...

diskoh wrote...


[*]Again, I didn't invent the definition. Most dictionaries say "fear or dislike." If you don't like the definition, write a letter to have it changed so you can feel better about being a bigot.

[*]For God's sake take some classes at a community college or something. A phobia is a medical condition, it is not just a fear or dislike of anything. Disliking spiders does not make me an arachonophobe. If I paniced, froze and broke out into a cold sweat when I saw a spider, then I would have a phobia.

If you don't like the definition of the word, then start your own dictionary with your definition. Because all of the major ones support mine.

Well quiet frankly you and every major source are full of ****.

A phobia is a medical condition.

also

No one in this thread is a bigot, get your head out of your arse.

[Frieza1987]

[Ryzaki]

Frieza1987 wrote...

QFT

[Varenus Luckmann]

tripehound1 wrote...
Pretty sure cannibalism is a crime against the people so can't be given consent for, like moider...
now if ya wanna eat a turkey sandwich the law is on your side

Legality naturally has no bearing. Naturally, it should be illegal.

Just like homosexuality.

Turkey sandwiches should be legal.

[thegreateski]

Ryzaki wrote...

...and we've reached personal attacks.

Yup. This thread is officially pointless now.

This thread was pointless the moment people started taking it seriously  . . . page 4?

[tripehound1]

Massadonious1 wrote...

Who says you aren't frothing at the mouth or breaking into cold sweats when you write your replies, hmm?

I definitely am... rabies blows, I keep having to wipe my monitor.

[Ryzaki]

thegreateski wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

...and we've reached personal attacks.

Yup. This thread is officially pointless now.

This thread was pointless the moment people started taking it seriously  . . . page 4?

Ah true. Ah oh wells.

ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL

[Massadonious1]

thegreateski wrote...

Well quiet frankly you and every major source are full of ****.

Rock on brother. I have a personal vendetta against the Thesarus myself.

How dare it tell me my words aren't eloquent enough!

[LOST SPARTANJLC]

Moving back , Liara a female asari who does not see herself as female.To become pregnant she would need genetic material that can come from a male/female.For her to be able to do this suggests male parts somewhere , though she clearly is female.

Hope it made sense.

Modifié par LOST SPARTANJLC, 12 mars 2010 - 06:50 .

[Chakku Sama]

Ryzaki wrote...

Ah true. Ah oh wells.

ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL

GET OUTTA MAH BRAINZ!

[Varenus Luckmann]

diskoh wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

diskoh wrote...

thegreateski wrote...
You are aware that dictionaries are changed on a routine basis yes?

That's a weak argument. The consensus of every major dictionary in the world that I have found supports my point. That is the correct definition of the word.

You're entitled to think otherwise, but you'd be wrong.

It's not an argument I'm just pointing that out.
Please don't assume things.

See, you're still arguing. You're out of control at this point.

Should we consider your interpretation of every word aimed against you being hostile or in argument part of your pathology?

Because casually pointing something out isn't the same as arguing, yet you immediatly seem to go into a defensive position.

Chill.

[diskoh]

thegreateski wrote...

diskoh wrote...

ReconTeam wrote...

diskoh wrote...


[*]Again, I didn't invent the definition. Most dictionaries say "fear or dislike." If you don't like the definition, write a letter to have it changed so you can feel better about being a bigot.

[*]For God's sake take some classes at a community college or something. A phobia is a medical condition, it is not just a fear or dislike of anything. Disliking spiders does not make me an arachonophobe. If I paniced, froze and broke out into a cold sweat when I saw a spider, then I would have a phobia.

If you don't like the definition of the word, then start your own dictionary with your definition. Because all of the major ones support mine.

Well quiet frankly you and every major source are full of ****.

A phobia is a medical condition.

also

No one in this thread is a bigot, get your head out of your arse.

[*]And the sky is pink, because dang it, I say so! To heck with facts! Them major sources are all wrong!

[thegreateski]

Ryzaki wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

...and we've reached personal attacks.

Yup. This thread is officially pointless now.

This thread was pointless the moment people started taking it seriously  . . . page 4?

Ah true. Ah oh wells.

ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL

Oh good lord that picture reminded me of something . . .
*Quoteing someone*

You're on the Normandy, taking a nice, relaxing shower...
Suddenly, there's a slight thud from the floor. You look down, and it's the soap.
No big deal, you think to yourself as you reach down for it. This is my private washroom. What could happen?

I KNOW YOU FEEL THIS, SHEPARD

Modifié par thegreateski, 12 mars 2010 - 06:49 .

[Ryzaki]

Chakku Sama wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

Ah true. Ah oh wells.

ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL

GET OUTTA MAH BRAINZ!

Only thing that will save this thread is quote pyramids and pics.

[Varenus Luckmann]

Massadonious1 wrote...
Rock on brother. I have a personal vendetta against the Thesarus myself.
How dare it tell me my words aren't eloquent enough!

Am I the only one that imagines a raptor with glasses, everytime someone says "Thesaurus"?

[Ryzaki]

thegreateski wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

...and we've reached personal attacks.

Yup. This thread is officially pointless now.

This thread was pointless the moment people started taking it seriously  . . . page 4?

Ah true. Ah oh wells.

ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL

Oh good lord that picture reminded me of something . . .
*Quoteing someone*

You're on the Normandy, taking a nice, relaxing shower...
Suddenly, there's a slight thud from the floor. You look down, and it's the soap.
No big deal, you think to yourself as you reach down for it. This is my private washroom. What could happen?

I know you feel this, Shepard

LOL

That would be one of the funniest endings ever for ME3.

[diskoh]

Varenus Luckmann wrote...

diskoh wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

diskoh wrote...

thegreateski wrote...
You are aware that dictionaries are changed on a routine basis yes?

That's a weak argument. The consensus of every major dictionary in the world that I have found supports my point. That is the correct definition of the word.

You're entitled to think otherwise, but you'd be wrong.

It's not an argument I'm just pointing that out.
Please don't assume things.

See, you're still arguing. You're out of control at this point.

Should we consider your interpretation of every word aimed against you being hostile or in argument part of your pathology?

Because casually pointing something out isn't the same as arguing, yet you immediatly seem to go into a defensive position.

Chill.

lol @ u

[Varenus Luckmann]

diskoh wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

diskoh wrote...

ReconTeam wrote...

diskoh wrote...


[*]Again, I didn't invent the definition. Most dictionaries say "fear or dislike." If you don't like the definition, write a letter to have it changed so you can feel better about being a bigot.

[*]For God's sake take some classes at a community college or something. A phobia is a medical condition, it is not just a fear or dislike of anything. Disliking spiders does not make me an arachonophobe. If I paniced, froze and broke out into a cold sweat when I saw a spider, then I would have a phobia.

If you don't like the definition of the word, then start your own dictionary with your definition. Because all of the major ones support mine.

Well quiet frankly you and every major source are full of ****.

A phobia is a medical condition.

also

No one in this thread is a bigot, get your head out of your arse.

[*]And the sky is pink, because dang it, I say so! To heck with facts! Them major sources are all wrong!

Did you just use "facts" in a matter of linguistics? To this, I ask you to define pink.