tripehound1 wrote...
Actually Scotland (especially Glasgow) does have a very high proportion of alcoholics
also how the hell has this thread STILL not been locked?
Well I'm pretty close to BioWare's time and its 3:30 in the morning here....
tripehound1 wrote...
Actually Scotland (especially Glasgow) does have a very high proportion of alcoholics
also how the hell has this thread STILL not been locked?
phordicus wrote...
skipped 21 pages of idiocy to say that there's nothing inherent in being hetero that requires opposing being ******. how about you just all move to kansas and let the rest of the world evolve.
p.s. i'm not apologizing for the kansas remark. it's so backwards as a state it might as well be in the South.
Modifié par LOST SPARTANJLC, 12 mars 2010 - 08:32 .
well if they've got any British moderators it ain't gonna last much longer cause it's 8:30 hereRyzaki wrote...
tripehound1 wrote...
Actually Scotland (especially Glasgow) does have a very high proportion of alcoholics
also how the hell has this thread STILL not been locked?
Well I'm pretty close to BioWare's time and its 3:30 in the morning here....
Varenus Luckmann wrote...
I'm inclined to agree from a "keep the peace and avoid butthurt gay persons" standpoint, but the problem is that there's no other way to describe negroes other than "******". Black is extremely generic and simply inadequate for anyone that tries to use a precise vocabulary.LOST SPARTANJLC wrote...
Correct , but blacks is a better term than ****** any day.
I have you beat. It's 09:33 here.Ryzaki wrote...
tripehound1 wrote...
Actually Scotland (especially Glasgow) does have a very high proportion of alcoholics
also how the hell has this thread STILL not been locked?
Well I'm pretty close to BioWare's time and its 3:30 in the morning here....
Technically it IS tomorrow isn't it?LOST SPARTANJLC wrote...
I give it until tomorrow(later today).
LOST SPARTANJLC wrote...
Everything racist always starts in Kansas.I never got that because their are way more places racist than Kansas.I would actually argue Kansas has improved.
Varenus Luckmann wrote...
I agree. I may find them despicable, reprehensible, revolting, diseased, genetically deficient, inferior, disgusting, unnatural, immoral or deviant - but I don't hate them.LOST SPARTANJLC wrote...
You can't stop someone from wanting to hate.As much as I don't like the way a gay person is I don't hate them.
my bad. i'm in the demographic majority on most counts except religion so i'd better stay out of that debate.tripehound1 wrote...
This thread's about racism now so way too un-intentionally contribute by calling all americans from kansas homophobes!
It is a waste. This thread was originally a joke thread . . . however eventually we got the obligatory "THAT'S PREJUDICED!" crowd in here and everything went to ****.LOST SPARTANJLC wrote...
Back on topic a war on the gay thread just seems like a waste.
thegreateski wrote...
It's the South West . . . but not TOO SW. if you go too far then you reach Mexico/New mexico/and California, land of the liberals.
Ryzaki wrote...
LOST SPARTANJLC wrote...
Everything racist always starts in Kansas.I never got that because their are way more places racist than Kansas.I would actually argue Kansas has improved.
That's weird...I always thought it was Texas.
tripehound1 wrote...
Ryzaki wrote...
LOST SPARTANJLC wrote...
Everything racist always starts in Kansas.I never got that because their are way more places racist than Kansas.I would actually argue Kansas has improved.
That's weird...I always thought it was Texas.
Never been so don't know... texas definitely has a bigger reputation than kansas outside the US for racism... having said that I've been to South Carolina which is supposed to be really bad but it didn't seem it, tennessee on the other hand... made me fell ashamed and I'm not even American.
Varenus Luckmann wrote...
Ah, you poor amerikaners and your limited vocabulary.
Ah . . . this is where "subtle" racism comes into play.Ryzaki wrote...
tripehound1 wrote...
Ryzaki wrote...
LOST SPARTANJLC wrote...
Everything racist always starts in Kansas.I never got that because their are way more places racist than Kansas.I would actually argue Kansas has improved.
That's weird...I always thought it was Texas.
Never been so don't know... texas definitely has a bigger reputation than kansas outside the US for racism... having said that I've been to South Carolina which is supposed to be really bad but it didn't seem it, tennessee on the other hand... made me fell ashamed and I'm not even American.
Yeah I have a lot of relatives in SC its not as bad as they make it seem.
thegreateski wrote...
Ah . . . this is where "subtle" racism comes into play.Ryzaki wrote...
tripehound1 wrote...
Ryzaki wrote...
LOST SPARTANJLC wrote...
Everything racist always starts in Kansas.I never got that because their are way more places racist than Kansas.I would actually argue Kansas has improved.
That's weird...I always thought it was Texas.
Never been so don't know... texas definitely has a bigger reputation than kansas outside the US for racism... having said that I've been to South Carolina which is supposed to be really bad but it didn't seem it, tennessee on the other hand... made me fell ashamed and I'm not even American.
Yeah I have a lot of relatives in SC its not as bad as they make it seem.
You know that episode of "scrubs" where the head doctor guy is greeting all the surgery staff . . . and then he gets to Turk.
"Whats up dog!" *fist bump*
It's like that.
thegreateski wrote...
Ah . . . this is where "subtle" racism comes into play.Ryzaki wrote...
tripehound1 wrote...
Ryzaki wrote...
LOST SPARTANJLC wrote...
Everything racist always starts in Kansas.I never got that because their are way more places racist than Kansas.I would actually argue Kansas has improved.
That's weird...I always thought it was Texas.
Never been so don't know... texas definitely has a bigger reputation than kansas outside the US for racism... having said that I've been to South Carolina which is supposed to be really bad but it didn't seem it, tennessee on the other hand... made me fell ashamed and I'm not even American.
Yeah I have a lot of relatives in SC its not as bad as they make it seem.
You know that episode of "scrubs" where the head doctor guy is greeting all the surgery staff . . . and then he gets to Turk.
"Whats up dog!" *fist bump*
It's like that.
Your sources need updating. The NSF is disbanded since quite some time back.UltraBoy360 wrote...
Varenus Luckmann wrote...
I agree. I may find them despicable, reprehensible, revolting, diseased, genetically deficient, inferior, disgusting, unnatural, immoral or deviant - but I don't hate them.LOST SPARTANJLC wrote...
You can't stop someone from wanting to hate.As much as I don't like the way a gay person is I don't hate them.
Wow... just.... wow. Just trying to get a little context for such vitriol... You mention on your profile: "National Socialist out of Sweden"... National socialism.... that rings a bell, where have I heard that term before?
So I guess you support these guys: http://www.search.co...Socialist_Front
OK. So is your hatred for gays (along with Jews I assume) based on neo-****sm?
Nice.