Panderfringe wrote...
Sloth Of Doom wrote...
Panderfringe wrote...
AntiChri5 wrote...
Panderfringe wrote...
Volus Biotic wrote...
AntiChri5 wrote...
@ Volus B: At the end of the day it is an image of her and she has the right to ask you to remove it.
I would have if she straight out ask before slandering me with allegation of harassment, but now I'm in defense mode. And If I take it down now people think It's something really horrid.
Yeah. That doesn't actually make a difference. If you're told to remove them you have to remove, "defense mode" or not.
His issue was that anyone who then saw Lilith's post would assume it was much worse than it was (like i did, purely out of loyalty to Lilith)
Oh, well, there was a very simple way to avoid that. It involves not doing the thing which sparked this.
So you are saying that nobody should post anything in case someone insanely overreacts?
I am not quite sure how you came to that conclusion.
Well lets look at this from outside, from a logical standpoint and not from who is buddies with who.
Party A took a publicly posted image and added a photoshop filter and two words then posted the modified image back to the same thread as the original.
Party B's response was public accusations of harassment, public accusations of theft, a public threatening of lawsuit against Party A and part A's family and verbal threats.
If that reaction seems logical there is a problem, and if posting something so minor sparks that kind of reaction then it best if nobody posts anything at all, we should just shut down the internet so nobodies feelings get hurt.