Ce sujet est fermé
Sloth Of Doom wrote...
Supercomputer? Do you even know what a supercomputer is?
Wait don;t answer that, you obviously have no idea what reality is.
Guest_Luc0s_*
Busomjack wrote...
Sloth Of Doom wrote...
Supercomputer? Do you even know what a supercomputer is?
Wait don;t answer that, you obviously have no idea what reality is.
You do realize that I game at 2560x1600 resolution, don't you? You think a normal computer is capable of that?
Guest_Celrath_*
Busomjack wrote...
Sloth Of Doom wrote...
Supercomputer? Do you even know what a supercomputer is?
Wait don;t answer that, you obviously have no idea what reality is.
You do realize that I game at 2560x1600 resolution, don't you? You think a normal computer is capable of that?
Modifié par Celrath, 17 mars 2010 - 11:53 .
Guest_Luc0s_*
Busomjack wrote...
Except for that part where you seriously expect me to believe that your AMD budget-puter is any match for my powerhouse Falcon Northwest supercomputer. YOu weren't serious about that part of course, right?
Seriously, AMD?! The GPU is nice I admit but the CPU does not compliment the rest of the hardware.
You should've bought a Intel Core I7 975.
Modifié par Luc0s, 18 mars 2010 - 12:03 .
Luc0s wrote...
Busomjack wrote...
Except for that part where you seriously expect me to believe that your AMD budget-puter is any match for my powerhouse Falcon Northwest supercomputer. YOu weren't serious about that part of course, right?
Seriously, AMD?! The GPU is nice I admit but the CPU does not compliment the rest of the hardware.
You should've bought a Intel Core I7 975.
My "piece of crap budget"-build blows your overpriced piece of thin away, just saying.
Intel Core 17 975 does the same as an AMD Phenom II X4 965, except that you pay twice as much for Intel as AMD. And while your i7 is only clocked at 2,6ghz original speed or overclocked to 3,3ghz speed, my AMD is clocked at 3,4ghz standard and can be overclocked to 4,0ghz. Games need a lot of gigahertz, which my "crappy" AMD obviously has more than your Intel. So yeah, you can guess which processor wins when it comes to gaming. I'll give you a hint, it's not your overpriced Intel i7. ;-)
But really, most "real" gamers I know who build their own computers slam AMD processors in their systems. They seem to have a little edge over Intel when it comes to gaming. However, Intel is more suited for multimedia-programs such as Maya and 3d Studio Max. Multimedia-programs need those extra cores, while video-games mostly need a lot of Ghz. So an AMD Phenom II X4 3,4ghz does a better job than a Intel i7 2,9ghz processor when it comes to gaming. And that's what my brother does, gaming.
Luc0s wrote...
I just today assembled a computer almost twice as fast as your computer Busomjack, for only 2400dollars!I build it for my brother who wanted a new gaming PC.
Well, with this little monster I think he can play his games for at least another few years before he needs an upgrade.
For the PC builders among us who are interested in the specs of the PC I just build for my brother (tell me what you think):
Processor: AMD Phenom II X4 965, 3,4ghz (quadcore)
GPU: 2x ATI Radeon HD5970 (crossfire setup)
Memory: 4x 2GB DDR3-1333 RAM (8GB RAM in total)
Harddisk: 2x 1000GB 7200rpm (RAID-0 setup)
And ofcourse some fancy extra's such as blue-ray burner and a card-reader. I'm not quite sure which motherboard I should slam this configuration on. Right now I've an ASUS M4A78T-E (with 2x AM3 socket with Crossfire and SLI support) in this current setup, but maybe one of you who happens to be reading this can help me out on the motherboard.
Luc0s wrote...
Busomjack wrote...
Sloth Of Doom wrote...
Supercomputer? Do you even know what a supercomputer is?
Wait don;t answer that, you obviously have no idea what reality is.
You do realize that I game at 2560x1600 resolution, don't you? You think a normal computer is capable of that?
Doesn't have much to do with your computer and more with your monitor. Your computer can be as good or as crap as you want, without the proper monitor you won't be able to run your system on a high resolution.
I know I shouldn't take you too serious and any nutjob knows that resolution is all about the screen, the monitor, not the computer, but I'm just sayin' ya know.
Guest_Luc0s_*
Busomjack wrote...
Luc0s wrote...
Busomjack wrote...
Sloth Of Doom wrote...
Supercomputer? Do you even know what a supercomputer is?
Wait don;t answer that, you obviously have no idea what reality is.
You do realize that I game at 2560x1600 resolution, don't you? You think a normal computer is capable of that?
Doesn't have much to do with your computer and more with your monitor. Your computer can be as good or as crap as you want, without the proper monitor you won't be able to run your system on a high resolution.
I know I shouldn't take you too serious and any nutjob knows that resolution is all about the screen, the monitor, not the computer, but I'm just sayin' ya know.
But you need a powerful computer to run games at that resolution. A powerful computer such as mine.
Busomjack wrote...
Luc0s wrote...
Busomjack wrote...
Sloth Of Doom wrote...
Supercomputer? Do you even know what a supercomputer is?
Wait don;t answer that, you obviously have no idea what reality is.
You do realize that I game at 2560x1600 resolution, don't you? You think a normal computer is capable of that?
Doesn't have much to do with your computer and more with your monitor. Your computer can be as good or as crap as you want, without the proper monitor you won't be able to run your system on a high resolution.
I know I shouldn't take you too serious and any nutjob knows that resolution is all about the screen, the monitor, not the computer, but I'm just sayin' ya know.
But you need a powerful computer to run games at that resolution. A powerful computer such as mine.
Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*
Modifié par Ivandra Ceruden, 18 mars 2010 - 11:14 .
I bet a machine like that will be needed to run Crysis 2 on ultimate settings.FlintlockJazz wrote...
It may be powerful, but to be a supercomputer it would have to be something like this...
Crysis 2 is running on CryEngine 3 which is optimized for consoles. My almost 3 years old PC will most probably be able to run it maxed out or at least close to it.virumor wrote...
I bet a machine like that will be needed to run Crysis 2 on ultimate settings.FlintlockJazz wrote...
It may be powerful, but to be a supercomputer it would have to be something like this...
*supercomputer image*
Modifié par Balerion84, 18 mars 2010 - 12:19 .
Guest_Luc0s_*
Busomjack wrote...
Benchmark ratings dissagree with your assessment.
http://www.tweaktown...sor/index5.html
The AMD 965 is about two years behind the I7's. Even an I5 is more powerful than your AMD.
Your fail processor must now bow down to my almighty Intel I7.
Modifié par Luc0s, 18 mars 2010 - 12:59 .
because my computer specs are so great? i put that there so people can see the kind of computer specs dragon age can use. my computer is serviceable, but nothing to brag about. my intent was to inform people thyat you don't need a supercomputer to run dragon age.Busomjack wrote...
bzombo wrote...
you're not bragging, you're compensating. big difference.Busomjack wrote...
Actually I posted this topic for some technical inquiry. Yeah, I bragged a little but I think a little bragging rights are due considering the piece of hardware I use.
At least I don't put my computer specs in my signature.
Retour en haut