114 réponses à ce sujet

[Dethateer]

Eh, it wouldn't have been really pointless. Same benefits, lower costs. But where would the fun have been in that?

[xDarkicex]

jgordon11 wrote...

That's really not proof at all you
realize. You realize they have pictures of the sites of the
moonlandings right? They have moonrocks that are clearly come from the
moon. Honestly its sad to see people so convinced of conspiracy
theories after watching a simple video when all they would need to do is
look into the topic deeper to see that they are wrong.

2 Facts for you, One is more of a theory so one fact I suppose, whats to say we didn'y setup the moon landing site too look like the site on the video at a later date? it is well known we where in a major space race with russia, and maybe we cheated to increase the hopes and moral of the amaerican people, also we where at a point in history where our people and government was very anti communist, how would we look if the commies won? So I can see the government cheating.
Now for the Fact with photoshop you can make anything look real my friend, simple as that.
And moon rocks Fall to earth all the time no need to go there too get them.

Weiser_Cain wrote...

Not even going to look as no conspiracy theory explains why the Russians would play along with the ruse.

Russians didn't know.. I mean they fooled everyone here, whats to say they didn't fool everyonther nation as well

"MOONLANDING WAS A FAKE. Have u ever wonder why the foot imprint of the
astronaults are so deep and clear on the moon surface and yet there were
not any signs either big or small of the Moon Landing's 'Blast Crater'
. As we all knew that jet engine is a very very powerful blast force
output.
" quoted from guy on youtube page thats pretty interesting idea right there no to mention the their is no wind in space point and you cna see the flag waving in the video.

Modifié par xDarkicex, 16 mars 2010 - 07:50 .

[Dethateer]

I wonder how long it will take for someone to bring up the "it was faked because there are no stars on the Lunar sky" argument.

[D.I.Y_Death]

jgordon11 wrote...

That's really not proof at all you realize. You realize they have pictures of the sites of the moonlandings right? They have moonrocks that are clearly come from the moon. Honestly its sad to see people so convinced of conspiracy theories after watching a simple video when all they would need to do is look into the topic deeper to see that they are wrong.

To be fair the flag waving in space is pretty questionable. There's no doubt the U.S. made it to the moon but I wouldn't put it past the U.S. to fake a moon landing to beat the Soviets either.

Anyhow its so trivial why bother to investigae further? I'd be more interested in knowing about the supposed explosives in the World Trade Center firemen heard and the fact that jet fuel doesn't burn at a high enough temperature to destabilize steel.

Combine that with the intel the FBI had about the attack weeks before hand that was burried (and revealed after) and the fact that the World Trade Center fell down and how it resembled demolition style implosions instead of a toppling motion and you have a genuine conspiracy theory that warrents attention.

This moon crap is just so trivial I con't believe someone made a thread about it especially in the wrong section.

Modifié par D.I.Y_Death, 16 mars 2010 - 07:52 .

[xDarkicex]

To be fair the flag waving in space is pretty questionable. There's no doubt the U.S. made it to the moon but I wouldn't put it past the U.S. to fake a moon landing to beat the Soviets either.

That is what I always though, I think we have been their now but cheated to get there first.

Also for all the people saying that people that think the moon landing was questionabe are all stupid morons, I just have to say I think you are all blinded into excepting what is in your history books instead of asking questions, you are ignoring scientific proof and how is that smart?

[Massadonious1]

Are you a 9/11 truther too?



Makes the same kind of sense.

[Ryllen Laerth Kriel]

That's right, we didn't visit the moon, because earth doesn't have a moon, it has Luna. We went to Luna. This conspiracy is rediculous. I guess NASA faked Apollo 13 just so they would get good press about defective equipment and losing millions on a botched mission? Some people search too hard for notoriety because they cannot do anything special themselves. Why not shoot down other people's achievements? I'm suprised this documentary doesn't have Michael Moore's pasty, whiny, uncreative butt somewhere in the credits.


P.S.

Mythbusters did an episode on the flag waving in a vacuum, a flag can wave in a vacuum and waves for longer due to the lack of air resistance which would normally stop the vibrations in the flag pole as it is set up.

Plus the film quality they went on and on about in the conspiracy theory video didn't mention the fact that some of the lunar footage was in color and in better resolution. Their first camera were kind of primitive, like the digital cameras on the Mars rovers. The crappy quality footage from the first Lunar landing likely was due to a small camera, space proofed against the vacuum and radiation shielded too. It was the first time they went there, they took new equipment, it was impoved upon later. It doesn't take that much imagination or reasoning ability to take that into account.

Modifié par Ryllen Laerth Kriel, 16 mars 2010 - 08:13 .

[Aesaar]

The bankers WERE behind 9/11, using the CIA and Dick Cheney's Death Star. After Agent Smith de rezzed all the civilians on the planes, they were loaded with photon torpedoes by the Jews (who incidentally were warned not to come to work that day). Then, they auto-piloted into the buildings. Bush and Cheney made sure that the planes were spaced far enough apart so that everyone would see the second plane hit. If you look in the smoke plumes you can see an image of Kyle Broflowski. Cartman figured this out in Mr Haney's class.



Anyway after Chewbacca and Han Solo help Luke take down Cheney's Death Star, the 4th plane lost conrtol and crashed in Pennsylvania. Agent Smith was blamed for this and was derezzed (he also liked to get interviewed which can't happen). The Pentagon was hit by a photon torpedo (looks red in those pics, doesn't it) but attention was on the WTC, so no media was anywhere around to blow that "story". Save one journalist who dissappeared and was mysteriously added to the passenger manifest of one of the planes.



So there you have it. Now my Zionist Masters™ may have me derezzed...



but I took the RED pill, and soon I will be in the REAL WORLD.





(thank you Atreides)

[Dethateer]

Dick Cheyney has a Death Star? That explains a few things.

Modifié par Dethateer, 16 mars 2010 - 07:59 .

[DarthCaine]

Jesus Christ people, don't feed the troll. There's billions of identical threads all over the internet

[WrexEffex]

Modifié par WrexEffex, 16 mars 2010 - 08:07 .

[D.I.Y_Death]

Massadonious1 wrote...

Are you a 9/11 truther too?

Makes the same kind of sense.

I believe that the truth will never be uncovered about 9/11 so I formed my generic opinion that explains 9./11 inconsistencies to the core.

At best the U.S. Government was so neglectful that thousands of citizens died. At worst they were directly involved and killed thousands of innocents. Either or showed that the bush administration was the wrong choice.

As for the moon landing, still don't care about it. Harmless lie to the public to stick it to the commies or real it was a good thing for the American people's morale and we all know that communism, while in theory is a superior form of government to Norht America's capitalist government, fails completely because humans are greedy.

Modifié par D.I.Y_Death, 16 mars 2010 - 08:03 .

[Dethateer]

The US Government has a history of being stupid. Just look at Pearl Harbor.

Granted, they didn't know what, but they did know that something would happen.

[Massadonious1]

Oh good lord.

[xDarkicex]

Moon has no Atmoshere so no wind

http://www.windows.u...s.html&edu=elem

[Dethateer]

If the flag were on Earth, it would either be in a closed room and never wave at all, or in an open field, where it would never stay still.

[Massadonious1]

[xDarkicex]

WrexEffex I have heard of it, why?

[WrexEffex]

xDarkicex wrote...

WrexEffex I have heard of it, why?

I misread your post, my apologies, I'm gonna go sit in that corner now...

[TomHark]

xDarkicex wrote...


To be fair the flag waving in space is pretty questionable.

It's not questionable at all unless you'e an idiot.  You've played ME2, so I assume you are familiar with Newton's First Law by now...

Also for all the people saying that people that think the moon landing was questionabe are all stupid morons, I just have to say I think you are all blinded into excepting what is in your history books instead of asking questions, you are ignoring scientific proof and how is that smart?

What scientific proof are we ignoring?  I didn't watch the video the OP posted, but I guarantee you that every point will have been debunked loads of times by many qualified people.  Google it.  Or just watch the Mythbusters Moon Landing special.

[Dethateer]

They have a moon landing special?

[AsheraII]

This is thread soooo 1995. Reminds me of the time that a newsreader was the best way to download pr0n, and alt.conspiracy wasn't full of spam..

[xDarkicex]

Dethateer Umm.. I don't even know that too say to that..



How about this, FAN, AIR DUCT Or Wind tunnel.. Pretty easy for us to change air flow and the wind out side is not a constant gust It can be very still for whole days with little air pressure.

The same can't be said for the moon as their is no air.



WrexEffex oh okay then no harm done no need to site in a corner.

[Dethateer]

*headdesk*
Because we all know that whoever made that was unable to get multiple takes if it was faked, and that they were stupid enough to leave a fan pointing towards the flag.

[e]
Sneeky, sneeky, Martin!

Modifié par Dethateer, 16 mars 2010 - 08:17 .

[D.I.Y_Death]

TomHark wrote...

xDarkicex wrote...


To be fair the flag waving in space is pretty questionable.

It's not questionable at all unless you'e an idiot.  You've played ME2, so I assume you are familiar with Newton's First Law by now...

Also for all the people saying that people that think the moon landing was questionabe are all stupid morons, I just have to say I think you are all blinded into excepting what is in your history books instead of asking questions, you are ignoring scientific proof and how is that smart?

What scientific proof are we ignoring?  I didn't watch the video the OP posted, but I guarantee you that every point will have been debunked loads of times by many qualified people.  Google it.  Or just watch the Mythbusters Moon Landing special.

Mythbusters are subject to censorship from their sponsors, owners, the government and whoever else who has a big enough gun to demand whatever they want and not ****** off the government. The flag waving is questionable. Can't prove it either way but the movite was definitely there. Don't outright dismiss stuff without looking into it first, that's what stupid people do and I don't think you're a stupid person.