The Moon Landing Was a Fake!!!
#76
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 10:03
#77
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 10:08
JustAnotherVoice wrote...
*waits patiently for a Turian Counsellor impression*
I agree....
That the OP is a total idiot if he really believes the Moon landing never happened.
#78
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 11:35
#79
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:08
#80
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:10
#81
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:13
#82
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:15
"Ah, yes, "man landing on the moon". We have dismissed those claims."JustAnotherVoice wrote...
*waits patiently for a Turian Counsellor impression*
Happy to oblige.
Modifié par Zeratul20, 16 mars 2010 - 12:16 .
#83
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:59
jgordon11 wrote...
b/c your an idiot...gmartin40 wrote...
People can call me what they want but I know it was staged
http://www.nasa.gov/...pollosites.html
See using these things called telescopes (no they're not a government conspiracy they actually exist) we can actually see where they did land...
>_>
There are many reasons to believe the moon landing never happened, you
know… the Extreme amount of Radiation you encounter in space, SPECIALY when you
get out of the magneto sphere (earths force field), the SUPER CRAPPY video, and
how at that time reaching the moon was like an arms race between Rusia and USA
and the space ship shields where pretty much based in Aluminum…
Taking all that into account and the fact that Neil didn’t
develop cancer or his stick died… then the chances of the manned moon landing
being fake are quite HUGE… UNLESS Neil wasn’t the one that took the hit for USA
and died a few years later of agonizing pain caused by radiation.
Nevertheless why are we talking about this?
PS: For those claiming Rusia didn't say anything think about this.
Russian Scientist: Council I tell you is impossible for the Americans to have landed on the moon.
Undina aka Politician: They have a VIDEO, and you have formulas, if we don't acknowledge their victory then we will look bad and that could cause a diplomacy incident!!!
Russian Scientist: Bu---
Undina: You are dismissed.
Modifié par Chaoswind, 16 mars 2010 - 01:11 .
#84
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:04
There are many reasons to believe the MANNED moon landing never happened, you
know… the Extreme amount of Radiation you encounter in space, SPECIALY when you
get out of the magneto sphere (earths force field), the SUPER CRAPPY video, and
how at that time reaching the moon was like an arms race between Rusia and USA
and the space ship shields where pretty much based in Aluminum…
Stupidity knows no bounds, does it? Cosmic radiation isn't constant. As long as no solar storms are coming up and visits don't take several months, the radiation levels remain at perfectly survivable levels. And newsflash: back in the 1960's there was no technology that would have allowed robotic moon-landings. It would have been more expensive and difficult than manned flights back in those days.
#85
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:04
jgordon11 wrote...
b/c your an idiot...gmartin40 wrote...
People can call me what they want but I know it was staged
http://www.nasa.gov/...pollosites.html
See using these things called telescopes (no they're not a government conspiracy they actually exist) we can actually see where they did land...
Yeah, but can you see when they landed?
#86
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:10
Beastfoot wrote...
jgordon11 wrote...
b/c your an idiot...gmartin40 wrote...
People can call me what they want but I know it was staged
http://www.nasa.gov/...pollosites.html
See using these things called telescopes (no they're not a government conspiracy they actually exist) we can actually see where they did land...
Yeah, but can you see when they landed?
Another good point
Oh and I didn't mean to say a Robot was sent... I mean Someone else was sent... I guess the Manned in caps is misleading.
and I ask again... why is this an issue? We can believe whatever we want, the social implications of admitting armstrong wasn't the first person in the moon are HUGE... so even if that where the case, no one is going to admit it
Lightice_av wrote...
There are many reasons to believe the MANNED moon landing never happened, you
know… the Extreme amount of Radiation you encounter in space, SPECIALY when you
get out of the magneto sphere (earths force field), the SUPER CRAPPY video, and
how at that time reaching the moon was like an arms race between Rusia and USA
and the space ship shields where pretty much based in Aluminum…
Stupidity
knows no bounds, does it? Cosmic radiation isn't constant. As long as
no solar storms are coming up and visits don't take several months, the
radiation levels remain at perfectly survivable levels. And newsflash:
back in the 1960's there was no technology that would have allowed
robotic moon-landings. It would have been more expensive and difficult
than manned flights back in those days.
First cosmic radiation IS constant; the only variable is the levels of radiation (x rays, gamma rays, etc) because NEWS flash, the sun is not the only star in the galaxy.
However there is no bigger evidence than the MANY photos and videos that (thanks to photoshot) can be easily seen how they where tampered and edited, or just clearly something very wrong happened with the lighting, because there is JUST one sun, and the shadow and lighting effects are very VERY wrong.
Modifié par Chaoswind, 16 mars 2010 - 01:28 .
#87
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:25
Mythbusters on YouTube, look it up. I can't be bothered with a link, especially considering that the conspiracy theory believers are impossible to convince.
*Edit: Seems that was already mentioned, so disregard this post - I'm sure that's already been done by the people that believe this idiocy though.
Modifié par Kasen13, 16 mars 2010 - 01:27 .
#88
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:28
#89
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:29
Bertrand Russell 1872 - 1970
#90
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:30
www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
Written by one of the greatest astronomers of our generation, Dr Phil Plate.
I'm done posting in this thread at this point. Thanks, guys!
#91
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:33
Is plain common sense... just look at the pictures and videos and tell me there is NOTHING wrong with them.
And if you can't use the pictures and videos as reliable evidence, then in what the **** am I going to believe? in moon rocks? in an extremely political situation? in the Russians? nah
#92
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:36
First cosmic radiation IS constant; the only variable is the levels of radiation (x rays, gamma rays, etc) because NEWS flash, the sun is not the only star in the galaxy.
And you assume this isn't what I said because...? "Isn't constant" - in other words, "is variable", in other words "varies in strength and intensity".
However there is no bigger evidence than the MANY photos and videos that (thanks to photoshot) can be easily seen how they where tampered and edited, or just clearly something very wrong happened with the lighting, because there is JUST one sun, and the shadow and lighting effects are very VERY wrong.
You do realize that what you are saying is a complete joke? Moon has two light source: the sun and Earth, and you can see two shadows on Earth quite often even with just one sun in the sky as well, when light does that little thing called "reflection".
#93
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:38
The thread starter is a gigantic douchebag and an idiot, dismissing and ridiculing some of humanity's greatest heroes and their achievement. This GIF is for you:

This will be the last you hear from me, seeing as the Reptilians now know of my existence and will take me down to the core of the Earth.
Modifié par Cascadus, 16 mars 2010 - 01:41 .
#94
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:38

Modifié par FieryPhoenix7, 16 mars 2010 - 01:42 .
#95
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:39
dsasxa wrote...
gmartin40 is such an idiot.
Yes really. I've stayed quiet all this time but this is just too much. Gmartin40 you're out of your ****ing mind. Please take a break from posting. I don't know if you're just an eccentric non-native speaker, or have Asperger's or autism, or are trolling, or are just an utter moron, but please, please, get a grip for Christ's sakes.
#96
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:46
I am full of doubt about the program, and I can see the chances of the moon landing being a political scheme, so why am I wasting my time posting in here? to get a bigger post count?
Again, I am not saying the damn thing didn't happen, I am saying too many odd things happened with those pictures... and reflection doesn't explain how 2 people that are a little less than 2 meters apart can cast shadows or different length, and I mean BY a lot.
#97
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:47
Modifié par RyrineaNara, 16 mars 2010 - 01:53 .
#98
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:48
LOL! I totally feel your pain, bro. I've gone through a lot of discussion on this very topic with other such people before. I've more or less given up. They will never listen to reason. I'd call it trolling, but I don't know anymore.

Modifié par FieryPhoenix7, 16 mars 2010 - 01:49 .
#99
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:48
Chaoswind wrote...
Really this is a waste of time.
I am full of doubt about the program, and I can see the chances of the moon landing being a political scheme, so why am I wasting my time posting in here? to get a bigger post count?
Again, I am not saying the damn thing didn't happen, I am saying too many odd things happened with those pictures... and reflection doesn't explain how 2 people that are a little less than 2 meters apart can cast shadows or different length, and I mean BY a lot.
The pictures claim has been dismissed as well, next arguement
#100
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 01:48




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






