adneate wrote...
Crytek has CryEngine 3 running on both of those machines and when John Carmack first demoed Tech 5 he boasted that it would look almost exactly the same across all 4 systems.
True enough. I'm far from a technical expert on graphics but I believe its easier to work with something like CryEngine 3 or Tech 5 as they're designed more for an FPS as opposed to a party based RPG like DA. I think I remember some of the devs saying how with the party members and such, it makes it more difficult to spruce up other visual aspects given memory considerations.
But at the end of the day, your average Bro consumer doesn't give a hoot about the technical considerations of why DA2 looks like poo while Rage looks like it descended from Heaven on a golden platter- all the "mainstream" consumer will wonder is why DA2 doesn't look as good as Rage and thus if DA2 looks crummy, the whole game must be crummy. If thats the demographic BioWare is shifting towards, those are the expectations they'll have to deal with.
errant_knight wrote...
Most importantly, it came right on the heels of Darkspawn Chronicles, a DLC so appalling that there just aren't words to express it's awfulness.All in all, it made Leliana's Song look AMAZING. On the other hand, I absolutely don't want that to be a game model. I would find it dull and uninvolving over extended play.
You know, thats exactly what I was thinking. I bought the Leliana DLC in part because I wanted to vote with my wallet that more story based DLC is what I'd like going forward. And you're right again in that many people probably viewed it a bit more favorably precisely because compared to Darkspawn Chronicles, anything is going to look better.
It tells a decent story, but I absolutely wouldn't want DA2 to be like Leliana's Song. It was ok and was probably one of the more polished post release things we've seen after Origins, but I've played Leliana's Song once and sadly I probably won't touch it again anytime soon.
Modifié par Brockololly, 14 juillet 2010 - 07:25 .