Aller au contenu

Photo

THE Morrigan Discussion and Research Thread *Infested with Bugs Yet Again!*


16183 réponses à ce sujet

#5201
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Swoo wrote...

I picked up the Witcher and put it down the same day I got it. You folks must have a super version compared to the one I got :P

Why did you not like it?

Re. Baldur's Gate- I think Mr. Addai actually owns it.  But it's hard for me to go back to the primitive games.

#5202
Swoo

Swoo
  • Members
  • 927 messages

Addai67 wrote...

Swoo wrote...

I picked up the Witcher and put it down the same day I got it. You folks must have a super version compared to the one I got :P

Why did you not like it?

Re. Baldur's Gate- I think Mr. Addai actually owns it.  But it's hard for me to go back to the primitive games.


Baldurs Gate 2 is far from primative! I'm playing through it right now and it's just as fun now as it was then. The engine held up well, and it's still one of the better tactically sound RPGs (at higher difficulties) I've played.

Witcher, lesse. The combat was horribly clunky. The voice overs were cringe worthy. The story was incredibly bland and boring and I'm pretty sure they telegraphed the reveals so heavily that I could guess them with ease (Amnesia my ass and the Order isn't a setup waiting to happen, ect). I hear they released like two to three reworkings of the game and have been patching and adding on like crazy, but everyone keeps telling me 'Just keep playing a few more hours and it will get good!' but they told me those lies with a Final Fantasy game who's 'tutorial' took about twenty hours before I gave up.

If you like it I bear no ill will, I just did not dig it enough to keep playing. I kept looking at Bloodlines, BG2, and Arcanum and drifting into which one I should load up and play again.

#5203
adneate

adneate
  • Members
  • 2 970 messages

Swoo wrote...

Ah yeah, I know they never would but to be completely upfront everything I've seen for DA2 so far graphically has made it pretty clear they are going to get slaughtered visually by just about any other major RPG release. It's a shame because the Unreal engine is soooo good and they already have it staring them in the face.


Well we've already seen The Witcher 2 it looks great on the RED Engine. If Bethesda gets involved and they have Elder Scrolls 5 on ID's Tech 5 engine it's going to be painfully obvious that BioWare is way behind the curve. Eclipse just is not going to be able to stand up against that, period.

Their other major Fanchise looks like this:
Posted Image

Their competition could have an RPG that looks like this:
Posted Image

And anybody could get licence for CryEngine3 which looks like this:
Posted Image

And this is the best they can do for Dragon Age 2
Posted Image

They'd better get down on both knees and pray every damn day that they only have to worry about CD Projekt.

Modifié par adneate, 14 juillet 2010 - 06:20 .


#5204
adneate

adneate
  • Members
  • 2 970 messages
To add insult to injury here's something to really make your blood boil.

Posted Image

That's Oblivion.

Edit: Running in real time with two community mods, The Oblivion Graphics Extender and Qarl's High Resolution Texture Pack.

Modifié par adneate, 14 juillet 2010 - 07:10 .


#5205
Brockololly

Brockololly
  • Members
  • 9 037 messages

adneate wrote...

Well we've already seen The Witcher 2 it looks great on the RED Engine. If Bethesda gets involved and they have Elder Scrolls 5 on ID's Tech 5 engine it's going to be painfully obvious that BioWare is way behind the curve. Eclipse just is not going to be able to stand up against that, period.


Especially with how they're aiming for a more cinematic take on things, the graphics will be under much greater scrutiny, so they damn well better be more refined than the screens we're seeing now. And if you're trying to cater more to the mainstream crowd, they'll be even more critical of sub-par graphics than your hardcore RPG fans. If the graphics don't improve significantly, it won't matter how awesome the writing or anything is- the mainstream crowd and reviewers will tear the game apart.

My Lord, I want to make love to the Tech 5 engine- the clouds and God Rays!!!! SO PRETTY!<3

#5206
Terra_Ex

Terra_Ex
  • Members
  • 632 messages

Swoo wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

Swoo
wrote...

I picked up the Witcher and put it down the same day I got it. You folks must have a super version compared to the one I got :P

Why did you not like it?

Re. Baldur's Gate- I think Mr. Addai actually owns it.  But it's hard for me to go back to the primitive games.


Baldurs Gate 2 is far from primative! I'm playing through it right now and it's just as fun now as it was then. The engine held up well, and it's still one of the better tactically sound RPGs (at higher difficulties) I've played.

Witcher,lesse. The combat was horribly clunky. The voice overs were cringe worthy. The story was incredibly bland and boring and I'm pretty sure they telegraphed the reveals so heavily that I could guess them with ease (Amnesia my ass and the Order isn't a setup waiting to happen, ect). I hear they released like two to three reworkings of the game and have been patching and adding on like crazy, but everyone keeps telling me 'Just keep playing a few more hours and it will get good!' but they told me those lies with a Final Fantasy game who's 'tutorial' took about twenty hours before I gave up.

If you like it I bear no ill will, I just did not dig it enough to keep playing. I kept looking at Bloodlines, BG2, and Arcanum and drifting into which one I should load up and play again.

Indeed, get the game installed Addai, if Barbarossa can do it, so can you.

Arcanum & Bloodlines both have their merits, of course Troika is now defunct so. I really liked Bloodlines despite it using the early Source build which certainly was not without its problems - it could have been a lot more, but it was pretty unique. There were a fan patches for both iirc which may warrant a future playthrough. CD Projekt are to be admired for their dedication to and belief in their product, which is one reason I'll be getting the sequel at release.

adneate wrote...
Well we've already seen The Witcher 2 it looks great on the RED Engine. If Bethesda gets involved and they have Elder Scrolls 5 on ID's Tech 5 engine it's going to be painfully obvious that BioWare is way behind the curve. Eclipse just is not going to be able to stand up against that, period.

Their other major Fanchise looks like this:
Posted Image

Their competition could have an RPG that looks like this:
Posted Image

And anybody could get licence for CryEngine3 which looks like this:
Posted Image

And this is the best they can do for Dragon Age 2
Posted Image

They'd better get down on both knees and pray every damn day that they only have to worry about CD Projekt.


... so, this is "super hot" eh? It's painful to look at.

Modifié par Terra_Ex, 14 juillet 2010 - 06:35 .


#5207
Brockololly

Brockololly
  • Members
  • 9 037 messages

adneate wrote...

To add insult to injury here's something to really make your blood boil.

Posted Image

That's Oblivion.


And what- Oblivion is how old? 4 years old? Daaaaaaaamn.

Step your game up, BioWare.


Another side point- if BioWare is making such drastic changes to the DAO formula, why are they calling this Dragon Age 2?  Obviously we don't know quite how much is being changed but wouldn't something like Dragon Age: Rise to Power or some other subtitle make more sense? It just seems like if they titled Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance as Baldur's Gate 3- it wouldn't make any sense.

Modifié par Brockololly, 14 juillet 2010 - 06:37 .


#5208
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Brockololly wrote...

Another side point- if BioWare is making such drastic changes to the DAO formula, why are they calling this Dragon Age 2?  Obviously we don't know quite how much is being changed but wouldn't something like Dragon Age: Rise to Power or some other subtitle make more sense? It just seems like if they titled Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance as Baldur's Gate 3- it wouldn't make any sense.

The writers are insisting that it will be a Dragon Age game because of the tone and atmosphere.  Gaider says to trust them, they know what a DA game is supposed to feel like, etc.

As I said in the DA2 forum, I could just trust them if the DLCs did not already feel like a big departure, and if the devs weren't out trashing the very things I loved most about the game.

#5209
MoSa09

MoSa09
  • Members
  • 1 526 messages
I just had a random thought: what If Flemeth possesses the body of Bethany, Hawkes sister, sometime along the way? That would add some nice personal touch to the game. And Hawke might be forced to seek help by someone who knows Flemeth and her powers better than anyone else?

Maybe, the course you can pursue from there depends if you gave Morrigan the Grimoire or not?

Modifié par MoSa09, 14 juillet 2010 - 06:50 .


#5210
Brockololly

Brockololly
  • Members
  • 9 037 messages

Addai67 wrote...

As I said in the DA2 forum, I could just trust them if the DLCs did not already feel like a big departure, and if the devs weren't out trashing the very things I loved most about the game.


Exactly- I figured with Awakening it would pretty much be more of the same with a great story. Thats what the devs said in the build up to Awakening- that they weren't changing things up too much just building off of what made Orgins great. As we know, that wasn't exactly the case.

And then they release throw away DLC like Darkspawn Chronicles and it just really makes me wonder if the devs have any idea why so many people liked Origins in the first place. The Leliana DLC was a step in the right direction, but in light of all the ME style changes they're seemingly bringing in to DA, the Leleiana DLC just seems like a test for a more simplified, linear Dragon Age.

#5211
Brockololly

Brockololly
  • Members
  • 9 037 messages

MoSa09 wrote...

I just had a random thought: what If Flemeth possesses the body of Bethany, Hawkes sister, sometime along the way? That would add some nice personal touch to the game. And Hawke might be forced to seek help by someone who knows Flemeth and her powers better than anyone else?

Maybe, the course you can pursue from there depends if you gave Morrigan the Grimoire or not?



Ooooooh, I like your thinking, MoSa!

That would certainly be very interesting and provide some nice conflict. Of course since it sounds like a fantastic idea, it won't be in Dragon Age 2;)

#5212
Lara Denton

Lara Denton
  • Members
  • 914 messages

adneate wrote...

To add insult to injury here's something to really make your blood boil.

Posted Image

That's Oblivion.

Let's keep it fair, this is not a screenshot from vanilla Oblivion.

#5213
GardenSnake

GardenSnake
  • Members
  • 425 messages

Brockololly wrote...

MoSa09 wrote...

I just had a random thought: what If Flemeth possesses the body of Bethany, Hawkes sister, sometime along the way? That would add some nice personal touch to the game. And Hawke might be forced to seek help by someone who knows Flemeth and her powers better than anyone else?

Maybe, the course you can pursue from there depends if you gave Morrigan the Grimoire or not?



Ooooooh, I like your thinking, MoSa!

That would certainly be very interesting and provide some nice conflict. Of course since it sounds like a fantastic idea, it won't be in Dragon Age 2;)

Ba DOOM CH! Posted Image

#5214
adneate

adneate
  • Members
  • 2 970 messages

laradenton wrote...

Let's keep it fair, this is not a screenshot from vanilla Oblivion.


I'd counter that it is fair. BioWare has professional artists and designers, yet they can't even out do modders working on a 4 year old game. They patched in advanced lighting techniques by themselves, what is BioWare's excuse for not being able to do it to their Eclipse Engine.

#5215
MoSa09

MoSa09
  • Members
  • 1 526 messages

Brockololly wrote...

Ooooooh, I like your thinking, MoSa!

That would certainly be very interesting and provide some nice conflict. Of course since it sounds like a fantastic idea, it won't be in Dragon Age 2;)


I see, somewhat is still pretty faithful Bw will give us something good :lol:=]:P

#5216
Brockololly

Brockololly
  • Members
  • 9 037 messages

adneate wrote...
They patched in advanced lighting techniques by themselves, what is BioWare's excuse for not being able to do it to their Eclipse Engine.


See: Xbox 360, PS3 :?

Modifié par Brockololly, 14 juillet 2010 - 07:04 .


#5217
Lara Denton

Lara Denton
  • Members
  • 914 messages

adneate wrote...

laradenton wrote...

Let's keep it fair, this is not a screenshot from vanilla Oblivion.


I'd counter that it is fair. BioWare has professional artists and designers, yet they can't even out do modders working on a 4 year old game. They patched in advanced lighting techniques by themselves, what is BioWare's excuse for not being able to do it to their Eclipse Engine.

Then do say so when you post the image. For somebody who never played Oblivion, that image might look authentic and it's not.

#5218
adneate

adneate
  • Members
  • 2 970 messages

Brockololly wrote...

See: Xbox 360, PS3 :?


Crytek has CryEngine 3 running on both of those machines and when John Carmack first demoed Tech 5 he boasted that it would look almost exactly the same across all 4 systems.

laradenton wrote...

Then do say so when you post the image. For somebody who never played
Oblivion, that image might look authentic and it's not.


I added in the name of the community mods. It is taken in game so I mean technically it's authentic just not Vanilla.

Modifié par adneate, 14 juillet 2010 - 07:13 .


#5219
errant_knight

errant_knight
  • Members
  • 8 256 messages

Brockololly wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

As I said in the DA2 forum, I could just trust them if the DLCs did not already feel like a big departure, and if the devs weren't out trashing the very things I loved most about the game.


Exactly- I figured with Awakening it would pretty much be more of the same with a great story. Thats what the devs said in the build up to Awakening- that they weren't changing things up too much just building off of what made Orgins great. As we know, that wasn't exactly the case.

And then they release throw away DLC like Darkspawn Chronicles and it just really makes me wonder if the devs have any idea why so many people liked Origins in the first place. The Leliana DLC was a step in the right direction, but in light of all the ME style changes they're seemingly bringing in to DA, the Leleiana DLC just seems like a test for a more simplified, linear Dragon Age.


Indeed. And judging the reaction to that from the reaction to Leliana's Song, really doesn't work. For one thing, it's a short one-off about past history, where much of it is unchangable. For another, it's a companion, not a PC. We don't expect to feel like we really are her, more like we're seeing through her eyes--and we know and expect her voice. It's a completely different kettle of fish than voicing a PC. Also, it was very short, as were all the DLC. We can accept something simplified in a way that we couldn't in a real game. That was also why I was able to accept most conversation opportunities being replaced by cutscenes. Most importantly, it came right on the heels of Darkspawn Chronicles, a DLC so appalling that there just aren't words to express it's awfulness. All in all, it made Leliana's Song look AMAZING. On the other hand, I absolutely don't want that to be a game model. I would find it dull and uninvolving over extended play.

#5220
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

adneate wrote...
Their other major Fanchise looks like this:
Their competition could have an RPG that looks like this:
And anybody could get licence for CryEngine3 which looks like this:
And this is the best they can do for Dragon Age 2
They'd better get down on both knees and pray every damn day that they only have to worry about CD Projekt.


Well, I wasn't harping on the graphics before... but yeah compared to those shots the DA2 graphics... don't measure up. The wasteland in that second picture looks great. As I've said before, graphics don't make or break a game for me--gameplay, controls, and voice acting make or break a game for me. However, if Bioware is attempting to draw in the mainstream crowd, these graphics aren't going to cut it.

#5221
adneate

adneate
  • Members
  • 2 970 messages

phaonica wrote...

The wasteland in that second picture looks great.


Tech 5 :wub:

#5222
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

errant_knight wrote...
Indeed. And judging the reaction to that from the reaction to Leliana's Song, really doesn't work. For one thing, it's a short one-off about past history, where much of it is unchangable. For another, it's a companion, not a PC. We don't expect to feel like we really are her, more like we're seeing through her eyes--and we know and expect her voice. It's a completely different kettle of fish than voicing a PC. Also, it was very short, as were all the DLC. We can accept something simplified in a way that we couldn't in a real game. That was also why I was able to accept most conversation opportunities being replaced by cutscenes. Most importantly, it came right on the heels of Darkspawn Chronicles, a DLC so appalling that there just aren't words to express it's awfulness. All in all, it made Leliana's Song look AMAZING. On the other hand, I absolutely don't want that to be a game model. I would find it dull and uninvolving over extended play.


I actually got this weird vibe from playing as Leliana, like this was *her* story and I shouldn't be putting words in her mouth. It was strange.

#5223
Brockololly

Brockololly
  • Members
  • 9 037 messages

adneate wrote...

Crytek has CryEngine 3 running on both of those machines and when John Carmack first demoed Tech 5 he boasted that it would look almost exactly the same across all 4 systems.


True enough. I'm far from a technical expert on graphics but I believe its easier to work with something like CryEngine 3 or Tech 5 as they're designed more for an FPS as opposed to a party based RPG like DA. I think I remember some of the devs saying how with the party members and such, it makes it more difficult to spruce up other visual aspects given memory considerations.

But at the end of the day, your average Bro consumer doesn't give a hoot about the technical considerations of why DA2 looks like poo while Rage looks like it descended from Heaven on a golden platter- all the "mainstream" consumer will wonder is why DA2 doesn't look as good as Rage and thus if DA2 looks crummy, the whole game must be crummy. If thats the demographic BioWare is shifting towards, those are the expectations they'll have to deal with.

errant_knight wrote...
Most importantly, it came right on the heels of Darkspawn Chronicles, a DLC so appalling that there just aren't words to express it's awfulness.All in all, it made Leliana's Song look AMAZING. On the other hand, I absolutely don't want that to be a game model. I would find it dull and uninvolving over extended play.


You know, thats exactly what I was thinking. I bought the Leliana DLC in part because I wanted to vote with my wallet that more story based DLC is what I'd like going forward. And you're right again in that many people probably viewed it a bit more favorably precisely because compared to Darkspawn Chronicles, anything is going to look better.

It tells a decent story, but I absolutely wouldn't want DA2 to be like Leliana's Song. It was ok and was probably one of the more polished post release things we've seen after Origins, but I've played Leliana's Song once and sadly I probably won't touch it again anytime soon.

Modifié par Brockololly, 14 juillet 2010 - 07:25 .


#5224
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

adneate wrote...

phaonica wrote...

The wasteland in that second picture looks great.


Tech 5 :wub:


If Bethesda is working with that for Elder Scrolls, that would just be amazing. Oblivion looked good, but they could really use some help with their character models, I thought. I also disliked the way they did dungeon leveling, but mods fix that. Gotta love mods. Bioware will have to release DA2 first or they will not be able to compete with an Elder Scrolls title, no matter what engine it's on.

#5225
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Brockololly wrote...

But at the end of the day, your average Bro consumer doesn't give a hoot about the technical considerations of why DA2 looks like poo while Rage looks like it descended from Heaven on a golden platter- all the "mainstream" consumer will wonder is why DA2 doesn't look as good as Rage and thus if DA2 looks crummy, the whole game must be crummy. If thats the demographic BioWare is shifting towards, those are the expectations they'll have to deal with.

I'm really confused who they're targeting right now.  If they're going for the Bros, the graphics are sadly lacking.  Meanwhile they're throwing us-  the type of player to whom Origins was marketed- under the bus.

I can only conclude they're trying to enthuse Mass Effect players?  Just how many of those are there outside the subset who already play DA?

It tells a decent story, but I absolutely wouldn't want DA2 to be like Leliana's Song. It was ok and was probably one of the more polished post release things we've seen after Origins, but I've played Leliana's Song once and sadly I probably won't touch it again anytime soon.

We held off because husband is off playing other games and because I was on vacation and hate Leliana.  But those coincidences have convinced me that holding off on future DA purchases until you know exactly what you're getting is a good idea.  They're changing too much.

This article is pretty good.  Gives more history of Kirkwall, which makes me more interested in it as a place, particularly its history as a slave center.  Apropos elves, I haven't seen any anywhere, but there have to be some.  Right?  Posted Image

Modifié par Addai67, 14 juillet 2010 - 07:37 .