Edit: Should be noted that the Awakening systems was heavily influenced by Mass Effect 2, again the writing on the wall seems obvious in retrospect.
Modifié par adneate, 01 août 2010 - 10:42 .
Modifié par adneate, 01 août 2010 - 10:42 .
You mean this,adneate wrote...
Well I can't find the link but I'm sure you've heard it too they essentially said all future DA games going forward will build off the Awakening conversation system NOT the Origins system.
David Gaider wrote...
MistySun wrote...
I read somewhere that Bioware have said they're removing camp conversation and future games will be more like the Awakening system.
Don't do it.
You made DAO a great success.
But you made Awakenings a lost cause. People (most) did not like it.
Stick to what you know best. To make a great game such as DAO.
If future DA goes the same way as Awakenings, you will lose out.
In other words...the end of the line.
A) As was pointed out above, despite what you "read somewhere", that's not what we're doing. Just because we're not doing one thing does not make it the extreme and exact opposite. Chances are it will end up somewhere in-between... which is, frankly, the case every time someone on the forums begins panicking over a perceived change.On the off chance what we implement isn't what you're looking for, I apologize in advance. Even so, we'll muddle through somehow despite what "most" people think.
David Gaider wrote...
I think you may, in part, simply be mistaking the amount of writing that goes into a full game like DAO and the amount that can go into something like an expansion or a tiny piece of DLC. I realize some people had issues with the interface used in Awakening, but even if that interface was what you were used to in Origins that wouldn't change the fact that there was exponentially less dialogue. That's something the "use both systems!' camp seems to forget. The word budget for Awakening was less than a tenth of Origins.Zanderat wrote...
I think that you may be missing the REAL concern (at least for me). The conversation system, while not perfect, did allow you to get to know your npcs. The depth of the writing allowed me, for the first time ever, to feel a connection to game characters. Awakening had none of that. This is my concern. We can only judge your intentions by your actions. And the double whammy of Awakening and the DS Chronicles, both utterly lacking the very core of what made DOA unique, is troubling.
Maybe we shouldn't have tried to introduce new characters with that budget? Maybe. Hindsight is always 20/20, as they say, and our effort was spent trying to present it as well as we could and also innovate a little to try some new things (which we tend to when it comes to expansions). And DLC is going to be even more daring than that-- some are going to be story-driven, some not. Some things work out, some don't, but that doesn't mean it's not worth trying-- and using them to extrapolate our intentions for future full-budget games is an interesting exercise, I'm sure, but you're welcome to try.
TJPags wrote...
I'm only following this loosely, but I have a question:
You all seem to want closure between the Warden and Morri. Clearly, you all romanced her, and did the DR.
What about those who did the US ending? What about female Wardens who never romanced her? What about male Wardens who didn't romance her? What about male Wardens who romanced Leli?
If DA2 or DA3 picks up the Wardens search for his LI Morri, well, how does it make sense for any of those people?
So, would it really be doable as you're suggesting?
If I'm missing something here, let me know.
TJPags wrote...
I'm only following this loosely, but I have a question:
You all seem to want closure between the Warden and Morri. Clearly, you all romanced her, and did the DR.
What about those who did the US ending? What about female Wardens who never romanced her? What about male Wardens who didn't romance her? What about male Wardens who romanced Leli?
If DA2 or DA3 picks up the Wardens search for his LI Morri, well, how does it make sense for any of those people?
So, would it really be doable as you're suggesting?
If I'm missing something here, let me know.
adneate wrote...
TJPags wrote...
I'm only following this loosely, but I have a question:
You all seem to want closure between the Warden and Morri. Clearly, you all romanced her, and did the DR.
What about those who did the US ending? What about female Wardens who never romanced her? What about male Wardens who didn't romance her? What about male Wardens who romanced Leli?
If DA2 or DA3 picks up the Wardens search for his LI Morri, well, how does it make sense for any of those people?
So, would it really be doable as you're suggesting?
If I'm missing something here, let me know.
Well this is a Morrigan thread so I think we do kinda talk about Morrigan more than say Alistair or Zevran. The US ending is the most final ending so it doesn't really fit into a sequel since The Warden is dead. I think in general we're in favour of actual forward character development as opposed to endless exposition, that a sequel with The Warden would have character development for all romance options not just Morrigan. For the Morrigan romance closure is obviously the critical factor in any character development, but she factors in some way into all runs regardless of whether you romanced her or not.
TJPags wrote...
I'm only following this loosely, but I have a question:
You all seem to want closure between the Warden and Morri. Clearly, you all romanced her, and did the DR.
What about those who did the US ending? What about female Wardens who never romanced her? What about male Wardens who didn't romance her? What about male Wardens who romanced Leli?
If DA2 or DA3 picks up the Wardens search for his LI Morri, well, how does it make sense for any of those people?
So, would it really be doable as you're suggesting?
If I'm missing something here, let me know.
Brockololly wrote...
Right here:David Gaider wrote...
tbsking wrote...
But the fact that the Warden doesn't get an ending is what's pissing people off about it. Every ending a Warden can get - aside from dying - implies that his adventures continue.
And if they do? The story of Origins was the battle against the Blight-- which you finished. You killed the Archdemon. That's as definitive an ending as you're likely toget. The hero walks off into the sunset and his adventures continue. Perhaps he heads off in search of Morrigan-- perhaps we even pick up on that plot in the future, who knows? But if the idea is that picking up on that one possible thread as the basis for DA2, continuing the "adventures of the Warden" (which would have to be an all-new adventure since, as I pointed out above, his battle is already done), is the entire point of Origins... well, I'm not so sure about that. I can see why you might be attached to your Warden character and even the romance plot your pursued, and perhaps the Warden's story might not be entirely done yet, but it certainly isn't the focus of DA2. There are new stories to be told.
Modifié par phaonica, 02 août 2010 - 12:54 .
Giggles_Manically wrote...
I am getting a laugh at Bioware's claims that DA2 isint a Mass Effect clone:
A voiced, single species protagontist, with a set last name
A dialouge wheel.
SHINY NEW COMBAT
Overall I am starting to think that Gaider dosent hold the belief that people can put two and two toghther.
TJPags wrote...
Well, but doesn't the Warden have an existing relationship with every NPC from Origins?
I mean, if we do a Qunari invasion game, would make sense to have the Warden deal with them, too, and for Sten to appear, no?
phaonica wrote...
I think a DLC or expansion where the OGB turned out to be something of a big deal would be fun. But if we canhave DLC in a world where the Warden didn't exist, and a DLC where I play as Leliana, even though I didn't care that much for Leliana, and obviously I am not Leliana, then I can see playing a DLC as an imported or AU Warden who did the DR and was searching for Morrigan. It could be considered AU if you want, but in that case every single one of us has a different AU story, so it's not really a big deal.
phaonica wrote..
I get this sinking feeling every time I see this quote. It makes me think that DG wants us to accept that Morrigan's story is tied to Thedas' story in a way that the Warden's story is only tied to the Blight, therefore the story of Thedas and Morrigan goes on without the Warden. But for a lot of us, the Warden's story was not *just* about the Blight. Just because a new story doesn't entail a Blight, doens't necessarily mean that our Warden wouldn't find something about it to be of interest and worthy of taking action, *especially* if it involved the OGB and Morrigan.
Modifié par Brockololly, 02 août 2010 - 03:14 .
Brockololly wrote...
TJPags wrote...
Well, but doesn't the Warden have an existing relationship with every NPC from Origins?
I mean, if we do a Qunari invasion game, would make sense to have the Warden deal with them, too, and for Sten to appear, no?
No, I mean, outside of Morrigan, its possible to kill off all of the other companions. Morrigan survives Origins no matter what. And to boot, Morrigan is intricately tied in with the plot- being able to be the father to an Old God Baby is a significant thing; even if you aren't the father, so long as you did the DR, you had a role in creating the OGB.
TJPags wrote...
Brockololly wrote...
TJPags wrote...
Well, but doesn't the Warden have an existing relationship with every NPC from Origins?
I mean, if we do a Qunari invasion game, would make sense to have the Warden deal with them, too, and for Sten to appear, no?
No, I mean, outside of Morrigan, its possible to kill off all of the other companions. Morrigan survives Origins no matter what. And to boot, Morrigan is intricately tied in with the plot- being able to be the father to an Old God Baby is a significant thing; even if you aren't the father, so long as you did the DR, you had a role in creating the OGB.
Wait - I'm SURE that Morrigan gives you the same option to send her away during conversations that everyone else does . . .doesn't she?
ximena wrote...
TJPags wrote...
Brockololly wrote...
TJPags wrote...
Well, but doesn't the Warden have an existing relationship with every NPC from Origins?
I mean, if we do a Qunari invasion game, would make sense to have the Warden deal with them, too, and for Sten to appear, no?
No, I mean, outside of Morrigan, its possible to kill off all of the other companions. Morrigan survives Origins no matter what. And to boot, Morrigan is intricately tied in with the plot- being able to be the father to an Old God Baby is a significant thing; even if you aren't the father, so long as you did the DR, you had a role in creating the OGB.
Wait - I'm SURE that Morrigan gives you the same option to send her away during conversations that everyone else does . . .doesn't she?
But she comes back for the DR, I think. o:
Guest_jln.francisco_*
Ooh, just got back. Thanks!Brockololly wrote...
Axekix wrote...
I missed this. Anybody have a link?Master Shiori wrote...
It's already happening bit by bit. A few weeks ago nobody was talking about Morrigan or DR. Now we have several high ranking staff at Bioware saying how Morrigan will be back and even Gaider hinting at Warden finding her.
Right here:David Gaider wrote...
tbsking wrote...
But the fact that the Warden doesn't get an ending is what's pissing people off about it. Every ending a Warden can get - aside from dying - implies that his adventures continue.
And if they do? The story of Origins was the battle against the Blight-- which you finished. You killed the Archdemon. That's as definitive an ending as you're likely toget. The hero walks off into the sunset and his adventures continue. Perhaps he heads off in search of Morrigan-- perhaps we even pick up on that plot in the future, who knows? But if the idea is that picking up on that one possible thread as the basis for DA2, continuing the "adventures of the Warden" (which would have to be an all-new adventure since, as I pointed out above, his battle is already done), is the entire point of Origins... well, I'm not so sure about that. I can see why you might be attached to your Warden character and even the romance plot your pursued, and perhaps the Warden's story might not be entirely done yet, but it certainly isn't the focus of DA2. There are new stories to be told.
Guest_jojimbo_*
phaonica wrote...
I get this sinking feeling every time I see this quote. It makes me think that DG wants us to accept that Morrigan's story is tied to Thedas' story in a way that the Warden's story is only tied to the Blight, therefore the story of Thedas and Morrigan goes on without the Warden. But for a lot of us, the Warden's story was not *just* about the Blight. Just because a new story doesn't entail a Blight, doens't necessarily mean that our Warden wouldn't find something about it to be of interest and worthy of taking action, *especially* if it involved the OGB and Morrigan.
phaonica wrote...
I get this sinking feeling every time I see this quote. It makes me think that DG wants us to accept that Morrigan's story is tied to Thedas' story in a way that the Warden's story is only tied to the Blight, therefore the story of Thedas and Morrigan goes on without the Warden. But for a lot of us, the Warden's story was not *just* about the Blight. Just because a new story doesn't entail a Blight, doens't necessarily mean that our Warden wouldn't find something about it to be of interest and worthy of taking action, *especially* if it involved the OGB and Morrigan.
Petehog wrote...
@knightofphoenix
But there were others that were sort of the same as well. Warden's Keep had the whole issue with Avernus and allowing him to study, etc. But it gave the impression that there might be more in the future.