AlanC9 wrote...
Barbarossa2010 wrote...
This sounds like a lead-in of the thousands that have hammered on blademaster and myself because we dare to possess a heretical view from community orthodoxy
If you don't actually want to get into those fights you shouldn't keep proclaiming that you're a heretic. I read of your position three times this week -- "of your position" since you weren't actually saying what the position is until now. Though I can understand not wanting to keep repeating the substance. Maybe you should put it in your sig?
And I thank you for returning to this anyway.
Having said that; first of all, there is no intent to mislead.
(snip)
Secondly: Technically you are correct, there are other choices, but as you have stated they are “not necessarily any better” unless of course one thinks that letting a woman you are supposedly romancing, sleep with another man is a valid choice; that was just not an option for my Warden. If there were choices other than these, then my failure to mention them was merely an oversight probably due to them being unremarkable, rather than any intent to mislead.
My point was that you know better. Saying there are two choices isn't even effective as rhetoric, since it gives anyone who doesn't already agree license to disregard your entire point.
Another choice is to refuse the DR but get someone else to do the US, of course. So in your language it's chump time (in two flavors), sacrifice your warden, or sacrifice Alistair (other option locked out by the time you get to the DR).
As for the substance:
Sure, Morrigan doesn't do a very good job of convincing you to do the DR. She's no good at convincing anyone to do anything. Having spent her whole life not being concerned about what other people think, feel, or do, it's a little late for her to start playing this game now.
Saying that your Warden thought the DR was a bad idea isn't an objection. It might very well be a bad, even disastrous idea. My first Warden thought so; a mage who saw this as exactly the sort of arrogance that got us into the Blight mess, he refused, and in the end had to choose between dying or putting Anora on the throne.
Saying that Morrigan is a flawed, even somewhat irrational person is also no objection. It's simply her character.
Saying that Morrigan won't give you your character the information he wants is also not a objection. Her character is under no obligation to do that.
So what you've got is that your Warden wasn't allowed to ask Morrigan questions that she would refuse to answer, to attempt Persuade or Intimidate checks that would fail, or to attack and kill her. I can agree with all of these as a matter of RP, though I imagine you'd have some explaining to do in the latter case, which would make it slightly costly in terms of VA work. I don't find your character's reasoning for wanting to kill her rational at all since she can't put her plan into effect without the cooperation of a Grey Warden, but I have no objection to people playing sociopaths as long as implementing those choices is nearly free.
Again, thanks for the clarification.
Um, no. What I got is what I outlined for you. That hasn’t changed. My objections remain my objections for the reasons I’ve stated. Your response did nothing to cause me to change that view.
But, you are welcome, and I appreciate some of your comments. But I still fail to see how these are not “rational” or valid objections, since you are really offering little more than a very brief interpretive opinion in opposition based upon whatever set of assumptions you embrace. I think it’s very rational to see Morrigan as a threat (with the knowledge you have at the point of the DR) and I think I've made the case fairly well that my Warden was forced out of character for the sake of a plot hook. In essence, this makes me an unsatisfied consumer, but especially it makes me an unhappy gamer, where otherwise I probably would have said it was the best game I ever played. You offer nothing to change my mind or alleviate my unhappiness with the story, but I understand you may have a differing opinion and you are welcome to that.
I think doing her ritual with so little information (information she has BTW and is merely withholding) is irresponsible for a Grey Warden. But more importantly, I think for Morrigan even to expect you to do it with so little information is unrealistic and only led a romancing Warden to a contrived ending.
Regarding the cooperation of a Grey Warden: I definitely fail to understand your point here. It is precisely because Morrigan required a Grey Warden for her Ritual that I believe she had an absolute obligation to provide him with information, being that she sought to attract the “essence” (whatever that really means) of the very thing a Grey Warden is sworn to destroy. That she supposedly “loved” a romancing Warden only compounded that obligation in mind. Thus, her not doing this was more of a literary device than an instrument of her actual “character.” The plot gods didn’t see it that way and I think it was contrived and left me flat at the end. I have yet to see a good rationalization of that yet, and you didn’t provide one.
Regarding your accusation of me ‘misleading:’ You’re really just nitpicking here rather than really making an earnest attempt at instructing a wayward soul in the rhetorical method. I've stated clearly there is no intent to deceive and have outlined why based upon economy. If you don’t buy it and wish to see it as “misleading” you are certainly free to continue to do so.
Regarding sociopathology: I'm not sure why you would accuse my Warden of being a sociopath, other than taking an underhanded poke at someone you disagree with (or has somehow offended you), but you are certainly free to do so if you feel the need. It is an interesting accusation though. I hadn’t realized that sociopaths were capable of love or self-sacrifice. New one on me. Actually I would have argued that it was Morrigan (although we were all rooting for her), rather than my Warden, who better exhibited the marks of a sociopath, (antisocial behavior, lacking in empathy, shallow emotions, grandiosity, inability to love, sense of entitlement), but I digress.
I am pleased that you are happy with your outcomes and your rationalizations supporting them, I especially admire your need/desire to defend them; I'm just not moved by them in the least; but that's the nature of interpretive opinion: everybody's got one, always based upon a set of axioms or assumptions to underlie them, but yours are unfortunately no more valid than mine, especially in such a subjective realm.
Oh, and in all fairness I must say I have no objection to people playing gullible patsies as long as implementing those choices is nearly free.