Not at the same time. I think only one will voice, but not sure. I have heard Mordin say it. Haven't brought Garrus on the final boss yet.Shandepared wrote...
I'm still curious about all of this though. Has everyone actually heard Mordin and Garrus voice those dialog files at the time? I took them both there to kill the Reaper last time I played and neither of them had any objection.
Collector Base--Angels and Devils On Your Shoulders
#51
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 09:02
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
#52
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 09:03
Shandepared wrote...
I'm still curious about all of this though. Has everyone actually heard Mordin and Garrus voice those dialog files at the time? I took them both there to kill the Reaper last time I played and neither of them had any objection.
Yeah, I took Garrus and Tali, and then Mordin and Thane and each of them said something. I think they didn't say anything on your playthrough because they're both "renegades." I took two "paragons" and they didn't say anything either.
#53
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 09:05
JohnnyDollar wrote...
Perhaps, but I think you are missing a few things though. Shielding, weapons, propulsion, etc..Relshar wrote...
Reaper tech means indoctrination. If TIM gets his hands on it you know he is going to indoctrinate human colonies to build his own reaper ship.
Look at Cerberus past record in experiments.
How the Reapers function and possible weaknesses that we can exploit.
EDI has already datamined the base's computers and got the information from it (both endings...we always get the datapad). I think it doesn't make a huge difference in ME3.
#54
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 09:05
Guest_Shandepared_*
unknownuser wrote...
Yeah, I took Garrus and Tali, and then Mordin and Thane and each of them said something. I think they didn't say anything on your playthrough because they're both "renegades." I took two "paragons" and they didn't say anything either.
Huh, that's weird. You'd think that no matter what one of your squaddies would voice an opinion.
#55
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 09:06
Guest_Shandepared_*
Barquiel wrote...
EDI has already datamined the base's computers and got the information from it (both endings...we always get the datapad). I think it doesn't make a huge difference in ME3.
She's gotten information, but I doubt she could have had time to get EVERYTHING out of the base. If that were the case TIM wouldn't have cared about saving it or not.
#56
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 09:10
Ramikadyc wrote...
KarmaTheAlligator wrote...
Mordin also stats that if a species isn't ready for the technology, it'll be a disaster like with the Krogans. I really don't understand why those two change their mind on this.
Mordin also says that the technology should come about as a means of compensating for limitations. One could argue that the current galactic races need to make up for a lot of shortcoming if they are to have any hope of defeating the Reapers--thus, the Collector Base.
That it should "come about" (be discovered/invented/developed) as a means for compensating for limitations.
This would be more like copying off somebody else's test. That would, imo, put this more on the not ready for the technology/disasterous side of the ledger.
Modifié par LoreWalker, 19 mars 2010 - 09:11 .
#57
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 09:11
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Realisticly speaking, I agree it will not matter if you save or destroy the base in ME3. I believe a lot of decisions we have made will not matter in ME3, but we better not go there though. lol That will take us into the abyss. lolBarquiel wrote...
JohnnyDollar wrote...
Perhaps, but I think you are missing a few things though. Shielding, weapons, propulsion, etc..Relshar wrote...
Reaper tech means indoctrination. If TIM gets his hands on it you know he is going to indoctrinate human colonies to build his own reaper ship.
Look at Cerberus past record in experiments.
How the Reapers function and possible weaknesses that we can exploit.
EDI has already datamined the base's computers and got the information from it (both endings...we always get the datapad). I think it doesn't make a huge difference in ME3.
It is just fun for me to talk about it and theorize and speculate as if the threat was real and how we should go about dealing with it.
#58
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 09:12
What I´m gonna do once ME3 is out, is playing all 3 Games again with a completely new character, just to have a "complete" playthrough that I like best.
That way I know what happens and which decisions give me the most satisfying result later on.
#59
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 09:29
JohnnyDollar wrote...
It is just fun for me to talk about it and theorize and speculate as if the threat was real and how we should go about dealing with it.
You're right^_^
Well, if there was an option to hand the base over to the Council, than I would probably do that.
- evidence!
- all council races should benefit from it (if we find anything useful); but I doubt the Collectors have technology that will help against the reaper fleet (their ship wasn't very advanced)
#60
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 09:31
KillaKow wrote...
I think once they see TIM's evil smirk after he gets the base they realize they probably shouldn't have given him such a massive tech cache.
This was when I realized Bioware stole the choice of who I give the base TO away from me. I'd keep it and give it to the council saying: "HERES YOUR MOTHER EFFING PROOF DAMMET!"
I dun like TIM.:innocent:
#61
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 09:53
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Maybe not, Cerberus did afterall gather information from the Derilect Reaper before the team was indoctrinated. I assume that a lot of that info was sent off to Cerberus HQ. I would think that although EDI datamined all the info she could, having a physical base containing the Reaper development/creation process may be worth salvaging in hopes of finding a weakness. Giving it to the Alliance would be preferable perhaps than giving to Cerberus. With a threat of this magnitude, I just don't think we should take any chances at all. Hence get our hands on anything that we can in hopes of helping us deal with the threat regardless of the ramifications of Cerberus using it for sinister unworthy goals. We may have to just deal with them later on down the line after we have saved the galaxy from extinction.Barquiel wrote...
but I doubt the Collectors have technology that will help against the reaper fleet (their ship wasn't very advanced)
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 19 mars 2010 - 09:56 .
#62
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 10:04
Guest_Shandepared_*
JohnnyDollar wrote...
We may have to just deal with them later on down the line after we have saved the galaxy from extinction.
The advancement of humanity is not a worth goal? Way to be a traitor.
#63
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 10:08
Modifié par bobobo878, 19 mars 2010 - 10:08 .
#64
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 10:09
bobobo878 wrote...
I can't wait to see the Batarian reaper the illusive man puts together!
You mean the Vorcha Reaper, surely?
#65
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 10:11
#66
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 10:13
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Perhaps I should have said unworthy sinister "methods". I don't think the advancement of humanity should entail brutal experiments on fellow humans. Not to mention the lack of command in control concerning smaller rouge cells within the organization.Shandepared wrote...
JohnnyDollar wrote...
We may have to just deal with them later on down the line after we have saved the galaxy from extinction.
The advancement of humanity is not a worth goal? Way to be a traitor.
Edit: I don't trust that Cerberus will not try to create another Reaper or some other similar creation either. I am not sure if that would be a very good way to advance humanity with the dangers involved.
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 19 mars 2010 - 10:24 .
#67
Posté 19 mars 2010 - 10:17
Modifié par xedgorex, 19 mars 2010 - 10:18 .
#68
Posté 04 mai 2010 - 07:47
"Hey, no problem! Of course I'll keep this station and all it's wonderous and potentially dangerous technology intact for you!"
Hell no.
TIM's not getting his goddamn toy. He's lucky if he gets a quick death.
#69
Posté 04 mai 2010 - 09:05
#70
Posté 04 mai 2010 - 08:08
...Shepard regularly endangers the lives of his people. There's a scene in which your crewmates will joke about how it's done about twice a day. Shepard will risk lives when he sees it necessary, which was exactly what TIM did in regards to the Collector ship.Illuminaut wrote...
The Illusive Man has on several occasions deliberately endangered the lives of Shepard and his entire crew, kept him in the dark about matters that would leave any regular soldier screaming at his superiors until blue in the face and in the end suddenly expects him to turn around and say:
"Hey, no problem! Of course I'll keep this station and all it's wonderous and potentially dangerous technology intact for you!"
Hell no.
TIM's not getting his goddamn toy. He's lucky if he gets a quick death.
Cheesy writing? Sure. Unreasonable? You had to have that data, and you weren't going to get it if the Collectors were in the least warned off. You almost didn't have time to get the data as was.
#71
Posté 04 mai 2010 - 08:10
Since when did someone have to be non-human to be an extreme cost-benefit actor? Shepard has robot eyes, and no one has reason to call him a AI.pinzig wrote...
Hell, I'm not even sure that mister robot blue eyes IS human, and not some sinister AI programmed with a directive to save/serve humanity at all costs, or something else entirely (remember, you never meet him in person). Certainly not handing that immoral so and so a collector base.
#72
Posté 04 mai 2010 - 08:27
My emotional instinct after I saw the Illusive Man's calculative smirk upon keeping the base was that I had made the wrong call, and this emotional instinct was further reinforced when all my teammates disagreed with the choice.
My teammates change in heart doesn't help matters. I've never heard any of those comments, not once, except for Miranda's. Why?
#73
Posté 04 mai 2010 - 08:40
#74
Posté 04 mai 2010 - 08:59
Vegielamb wrote...
Oh boy, so this is how they're dividing up the party for M3.
Huh?
#75
Posté 04 mai 2010 - 09:01




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







