Aller au contenu

Photo

To those who spared the Architect...


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1316 réponses à ce sujet

#1001
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages
[quote]I could not kill those who showed even the glimmer of humanity even if it was newly acquired. [/quote]You realize that EVERYONE in the game except for Vaughan and Howe (who surprisingly got his turn through talks with Nataniel) showed a glimmer of humanity? Loghain did, Anora did, Branka did, Bhelen and Harrowmont both did but one of them still had to die, Zathrian did, Uldred did, Jowan did...everyone. Did you just not kill anyone in the game at all?


[quote]At least the darkspawn do what they do at the behest of a god, as opposed to humans who do all the same things for whatever reasons happen to be handy, usually personal gain. [/quote]Yeah, you can blame the Blight and roaming around looking for Old Gods on the Old Gods. The turning people into Broodmothers and killing those they encounter? So not the Old Gods fault.


[quote]The childer grubs were specifically a Mother creation, the Architect seems to be more benovelent than some so called "humans" in the game, Loghain, Bhelen, Branka, Zathrian, Anora, are all choices the player can make as to whether they live or die and yet a darkspawn who shows more compassion than any of the mentioned individuals would be killed on sight. [/quote]The Mother didn't 'create' them: she birthed them. The Mother did not demonstrate that she will have hurlocks, genlocks, or sheiks but rather the 'Children' which everyone agreed were an abomination. The Mother is insane and can't keep calm for longer than five minutes, it seems, so I kind of doubt she genetically engineered herself to give birth to the 'Children' and rather they are the natural result of being 'awakened.' Since actual GW either can't reproduce or do so with great difficulty, it makes sense that Broodmother's reproduction would be effected. And the Messenger shows no sign of compassion until the epilogue anyway so since no one makes the connection, it's probably metagaming for the Warden to know what happened to him. He agrees to fight with you in the city if that's the condition you have for letting him live but self-preservation does not equal intelligence.


[quote]Utha donated her blood, Serrani i think is willing to become the next brood mother, so with the Architect's guidance, Serrani as the brood mother i think the darkspawn are in for an evolutionary turn. [/quote]I don't think we have any evidence of that and certainly no evidence that either Utha or Seranni are mentally sound. Besides, since I highly doubt sanity has any impract on what kind of offspring you produce, her being sane wouldn't mean she still wouldn't produce the 'Children' or perhaps the elven equivalent if the Mother was once a different race. And it's muh easier to say 'I believe in what you're doing' to the Architect then 'I am willing to become a Broodmother myself.'



[quote]Who is to say that if the taint is contagious as it is then why is it that the Wardens are tainted but still not infectious, could it be because of the joining? The darkspawn taint can not be as contagious as it is made out to be because in Orgins you have party members covered in darkspawn blood for the duration of the game and not a single one has turned yet. [/quote]Oh, that is a point. We know that being 'awakened' doesn't completely stop the spread f the taint as the Messenger still spreads it but it seems the spread isn't as widespread as it should be or else people would make the connection that everyone infected was helped by the mysterious cloaked traveller. And originally your companions WERE suppsoed to be tainted and go through the Joining but, like many other things, it was cut for time so the characters had plot immunity.


[quote]Really? Bregan ( Commander of the Grey in Orlais btw ) sided with him until the Architect killed Genevieve and that was with the Architect planning to turn everyone into Wardens not like now where he merely needs Grey Warden Blood. Utha did the same. [/quote]

First of all, I've yet to see any evidence of Utha being even remotely sane and she'll clearly turning into a ghoul. Remember how sane Tamlen was? Or Ruck? And look how well siding with the Architect and letting him live in the Calling worked. We had another Blight and all of that mess with Amaranthine and the Mother. And what do we have to show for it besides a lot of death, destruction, kidnapped and experimented on GW? A few intelligent darkspawn, only one of which has actually shown any decencyin the entire game.


[quote]Duncan would not have joined Architect if he had similar goals like in the Calling but you can bet he would have allied him if presented with the offer you are presented in Awakening. [/quote]I'm not so sure. A big reason for allying with him then was that he promised his help defeating the Mother. The Mother, for all her intelligence and craziness, was just a Broodmother and killing her wasn't any harder than killing Laryn in the first game. It wasn't the easiest thing in the world, granted, and once she picked up my companions and held them immobile while she attacked them they were pretty much guarenteed to be taken out of the fight but it was quite doable and if anyone had any ranged attacks (or was a ranger and could throw bears, wolves, and spiders at her) then she couldn't even attack back.

Besides, Duncans goals appeared to be 1) stop the Blight 2) make sure we're not kicked out of Ferlden again and have enough people to do our jobs 3) kill darkspawn 4) everything else Even if he did initially side with the Architect, there was no way he'd let him live after realizing he started the Fifth Blight. Another compelling reason Duncan would have for not siding with him is that he was around during the events of the Calling and knows just how insane and devastating the Architects plans can get. Just because he might have SAID hs goals had changed (because you know Duncan would have asked) does not mean that he would have been being honest.


[quote]A grey warden isn't meant to empathise or give darkspawn a chance, they are unworthy of trust or life and deserve only to be eradicated. They have not provided thedas with any reason to tolerate their existance and i doubt they will in the future. [/quote]Grey Wardens are not supposed to help darkspawn. They are supposed to kill them. That is kind of in the job description. Individuals like Utha and maybe you might decide not to kill them, but that is your decision as individuals and not as Grey Wardens as the order doesn't even remotely approve. GW are not called upon to be saints. They aren't required to give everyone a chance and show infinite mercy and compassion and no one expects that from you (expect possibly Wynne). You are involved in a war against the darkspawn and there is nothing wrong with killing your enemies rather than agreeing to work with them. You might agree to anyway and it might pan out, but you're supposed to protect Thedas from the darkspawn not be the morality police.


[quote]Well on that who can say, we don't have nearly enough to go on there. We have exactly one Darkspawn going bonkers and one becoming Batman, hard to say how it'll pan out when more and more start being created. [/quote]I figured that the Architect learned his lesson from the Withered and singled out the most helpful darkspawn he could find and sent him becuase if he couldn't soften the GWs before he was about to actually talk to them and propose an alliance than no one could.


[quote]Killing all darkspawn even when you don't have to is the shortcut. It's the easy choice. GW arenot inherently moral creatures. [/quote]Is it really the shortcut and the easy choice? There are a LOT of darkspawn and they can reproduce very quickly. Even if you manage to wipe out all but one they could still create and army of Broodmothers and quickly rebuild their race. A lot of this discussion, especially a few pages back, wasn't on the morality of the Architect or whether we had the right to wipe out the darkspawn but on whether it was practical to wipe them all out or if we'd need to settle on a compromise. If it IS feasible to kill them all and GW are not called upon to be moral (and they really aren't) then what justification is there not to kill them all and remove a known threat? Morality? You just said that it was not an issue.


[quote]His stated intent is to have 'peaceful coexistance' ... but does he really believe that humanity/elves/dwarves will accept that? If not-how does he intend to force that issue? [/quote]I don't think he really thought about that. He doesn't understand humans enough to realize darkspawn converging on a GW stronghold - even if it wasn't a sneak attack - would provoke hostilitiese or that knocking people out and stealing their blood before locking them in cages would provoke escape attempts and more hostilities. He really should ask Utha or Seranni for some tips on how to relate to non-darkspawn because he kind of fails at it.


[quote]In the Calling he planned mass genocide himself. He was going to force the Joining on all living things, and then out of the relatively few that survived, advance their Taint to where they were like Utha is in the game. [/quote]I still don't understand how he could have even begun to think that was a good idea. Say he succeeded and, despite heavy casualties, Thedas was populated soley by GW. Not only would they all be gunning for him but they wouldn't be able to reproduce so they'd die out after one generation and so his darkspawn would die out shortly after that. I suppose that's one way to achieve a lasting peace...


[quote]The problem is that, inorder to make all of the darkspawn rational creatures he needs greywarden blood. He wishes peace but at the same time needs our blood to create the peace. Its a peculiar thing. [/quote]It's even stranger because if there was peace and people became convinced that the darkspawn were no longer anything they had to protect themselves against, there would be no more GW. The Mother showed that Broodmothers with GW blood do not spawn nomal darkspawn so Broodmothers would have to be kept mindless - which would probably be kinder for them - and each darkspawn would have to be 'awakened' individually. That's a lot of GW blood required and I can't see people sacrificing as much as they have to to become GW and possibly dying in the process just to serve as a bloodbank.

Modifié par Sarah1281, 28 mars 2010 - 05:15 .


#1002
Vicious

Vicious
  • Members
  • 3 221 messages

You realize that EVERYONE in the game except for Vaughan and Howe (who surpriingly got his turn through talks with Nataniel) showed a glimmer of humanity? Loghain did, Anora did, Branka did, Bhelen and Harrowmont both did but one of them still had to die, Zathrian did, Uldred did, Jowan did...everyone. Did you just not kill anyone in the game at all?




ROFL

#1003
Layn

Layn
  • Members
  • 590 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...
You realize that EVERYONE in the game except for Vaughan and Howe (who surpriingly got his turn through talks with Nataniel) showed a glimmer of humanity? Loghain did, Anora did, Branka did, Bhelen and Harrowmont both did but one of them still had to die, Zathrian did, Uldred did, Jowan did...everyone. Did you just not kill anyone in the game at all?

i let alistair kill loghain, but only because i wanted to keep alistair (damn my selfishness!). anora is imprisoned. branka attacked me. bhelen attacked me. Zathrian agreed to free the werewolves, uldred was attacking the people who i needed to defeat the blight. can't remember about Jowan, but i sure didn't kill him.

Sarah1281 wrote...
He agrees to fight with you in the city if that's the condition you have for letting him live but self-preservation does not equal intelligence.

he agrees to fight at my side. thats already a good sign for me.

Sarah1281 wrote...
Grey Wardens are not supposed to help darkspawn. They are supposed to kill them.

yes and templars are supposed to kill apostates etc. history has showed us enough times that humanity isn't that good either, and that circumstances change and as such what you do has to be reevaluated

#1004
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Crrash wrote...
yes and templars are supposed to kill apostates etc. history has showed us enough times that humanity isn't that good either, and that circumstances change and as such what you do has to be reevaluated


Actually no.  The Templars with Chantry consent have (to no one's suprise) grossly overstepped what their role is supposed to be.  The role of the Templar is the guard sanctioned mages and to protect the people against unsanctioned magic.  It is part of the Templar role to hunt rogue/apostate mages, but Templars are not required by Charter to kill them....merely make them approved (ie bring them in line with the tower).

It's the Chantry that has allowed the Templars to gain far too much power over "unsanctioned" mages.  Templars were never supposed to have the on-the-spot right of high justice towards Mages.  The Chantry has usurped that authority.

-Polaris

#1005
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages

anora is imprisoned. branka attacked me. bhelen attacked me.

If Alistair is hardened and Anora expresses surprise that he would still give her a chance for the throne he says it would be stupid to kill her when he could die stopping the Blight. No mention of any plans not to kill her afterwards. Branka and Bhelen only attack if you side against them. You know who also only attacks if you side against them? The Architect.


he agrees to fight at my side. thats already a good sign for me.

If you fight Caridin, Branka fights on your side. If you agree to fight Witherfang, Zathrian fights on your side. If you agree to kill all the mages, Cullen wishes he could fight on your side. Does this make any of them moral and/or sane? Not really. The Messenger is told 'fight or I'll kill you' and he chooses the option that might not end in him dead. It really says nothing of his morality or what he will choose to do with his freedom should he live (and the epilogue is metagaming).


yes and templars are supposed to kill apostates etc. history has showed us enough times that humanity isn't that good either, and that circumstances change and as such what you do has to be reevaluated

You know why Templars tend to to kill malificarum (not all apostates as they certainly drag Anders back six times and only try to kill him after the other Templars die and he becomes a GW)? Because there are enough blood mages who run around hurting and killing others to make it at least an understandable precaution. After all their history, GW killing darkspawn is an understandable precaution as well and I wasn't convinced that the Architect could pull his plan off, that he could stop the Blights forever, or that there was any benefit myself or any of the non-darkspawn races of Thedas would get for helping him.

Modifié par Sarah1281, 28 mars 2010 - 05:27 .


#1006
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages
About the Templars trying to kill Anders, I get the impression that the new Knight Commander (I forget her name off-hand) esssentially pulled what would now be called a "rogue operation" to kill Anders without the Chantry's explicit consent BECAUSE she couldn't stand to see him shelter behind Grey Wardens (who can as my character proved to the Chantry in the most brutal way possible....killing both the Templars and the Mages in a twoer) DO have the right to shelter Malificarum let alone simple apostates.



-Polaris

#1007
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages
Well, the fact remains that if you actually do side with the Architect the Darkspawn retreat back into the Deep Roads and go silent. Even the Dwarfs are given respite in their, prviously, unending war. So evidently something is going as the Architect planned, since the respite isn't caused by a Blight on the surface and a flux of Darkspawn heading there.



And Templars are allowed to kill apostates. A Templar's duty is to protect the commoner from unsanctioned magic. If the apostate refuses to come along willingly, the Templar might see it neccesary to kill the apostate.

#1008
Layn

Layn
  • Members
  • 590 messages

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

Well, the fact remains that if you actually do side with the Architect the Darkspawn retreat back into the Deep Roads and go silent. Even the Dwarfs are given respite in their, prviously, unending war. So evidently something is going as the Architect planned, since the respite isn't caused by a Blight on the surface and a flux of Darkspawn heading there.

well i wouldn't take that as 100% proof that the architect really is good. they might as well be acting more intelligent about their expansion, and amassing bigger armies than ever to take over the surface, instead of wearing out their forces against the legion of the dead

#1009
Volourn

Volourn
  • Members
  • 1 110 messages
"2. They must abduct and rape the women of the various humanities just to procreate, and must do so in a particularly vicious and vile way."



Rape? Why would darkspawn rape females? Do darkspawn have sexual urges? Do they have sexual organs? Do they use rape as emtional punishment to show their supeirorty? That doesn't fly with the argument that the only way darkspawn can procreate is by creating broodmothers? So, qustion remains, why would they rape anyone?





"That's a lot of GW blood required and I can't see people sacrificing as much as they have to to become GW and possibly dying in the process just to serve as a bloodbank."



I think the plan is to eventually use the awakened darkspawn's own mixed blood to awaken further darkspawn so eventually there'd be no need for other races' blood. As TA says )and which is a very common DA theme: It's about the blood.)



"Is it really the shortcut and the easy choice? "



yes, it is, because it's requires no thinking whatsoever. It's basic. See a darkspawn, attack it. Not complicated while actually seeing darskapwn as living intelligent creatures like we see elves et al scares people because it means you have to think when interatcing them.



Afterall, when we see humans, we don't go, "OH CRAP! He is like Howe, must kill him!"





People are acting like the GW are unintelligent unthinking unfeeling beings. If you don't think a GW wouldn't/shouldn't think things through when they encounter an intelligent darkspawn, youa re fooling yourself. I have no doubt Duncan would pause if he ehard a DS talking. He'd also likely hear him out and then try to make the best decision he could in the situation. Heck, he would use the intelligent DS to his advantage to battle the uninteiilgent ones or even against each other.



Also, let's not forget that becoming a GW doesn't magically change ones' morals. Your personality doens't change so GWs, by defintion, are individuals and will react to the intelligent DS in their own way as shown in game (or the book for those who read it which I haven't).



Also, what happens in the book shouldn't effect our decisions in the game since our GWs never went through it.








#1010
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

And Templars are allowed to kill apostates. A Templar's duty is to protect the commoner from unsanctioned magic. If the apostate refuses to come along willingly, the Templar might see it neccesary to kill the apostate.


Actually NO.  Templars do not have have the right of high justice (except with Maleficarum and evne that is questionable).  They are not permitted to kill Apostates on their own discretion.  The reason the Templars get away with it is because the Chantry in an obvious powergrab is trying to label all apostates as Maleficarum and that's simply not the case.

In one of my games, my Grey Warden Bloodmage showed the Chantry in the crudest possible way just how far their reach extends.

Volourn,

What part of Darkspawn can NOT coexist with humanity are you missing!  I don't care if all the darkspawn became suprageniuses with the moral fibre of Ghandi.  If their very existance puts humanity in peril, they ALL need to die.

-Polaris

Modifié par IanPolaris, 28 mars 2010 - 06:32 .


#1011
Volourn

Volourn
  • Members
  • 1 110 messages
No.

#1012
Layn

Layn
  • Members
  • 590 messages
but they don't have to coexist in the same environment. they can live underground, or get their very own island, or whatever.
we don't kill our fatally and incredibly contagious sick, we quarantine them. (of course, whatever sickness we can get, usually doesn't affect every living being, so its quite more dangerous keeping darkspawn alive, but still...)

anyway, using meta-knowledge we actually know that the architect won't need any/much more grey warden blood, since it wasn't mentioned in the epilogue

Modifié par Crrash, 28 mars 2010 - 06:39 .


#1013
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Crrash wrote...

but they don't have to coexist in the same environment. they can live underground, or get their very own island, or whatever.
we don't kill our fatally and incredibly contagious sick, we quarantine them. (of course, whatever sickness we can get, usually doesn't affect every living being, so its quite more dangerous keeping darkspawn alive, but still...)

anyway, using meta-knowledge we actually know that the architect won't need any/much more grey warden blood, since it wasn't mentioned in the epilogue


There is no such thing as a perfect quarantine.  Given that, you CAN NOT completely seperate the Darkspawn from humanity nor would they (the Darkspawn) want do even if they could be sapient.  Why?  The Darkspawn must prey (and violate) on the females of humanity just to continue to exist.

The darkspawn can not coexist with humanity and therefor must die.  Period.  End. Of. Discussion.

-Polaris

#1014
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages

Rape? Why would darkspawn rape females? Do darkspawn have sexual urges? Do they have sexual organs? Do they use rape as emtional punishment to show their supeirorty? That doesn't fly with the argument that the only way darkspawn can procreate is by creating broodmothers? So, qustion remains, why would they rape anyone?

It's in Hespith's rhyme. "Eighth day, we hated as she is violated." I suppose it could technically mean something else but 'violated' is pretty much accepted as meanig 'rape.' If it were just force-feeding them tainted flesh where would the "Sixth day, her screams we hear in our dreams" come in? If they have no other food they could very well turn to the tainted flesh to sustain them or if not they could be forced-fed without a lot of the extra trauma. So no, I don't think they rape people for pleasure or power like non-darkspawn do but it's how they reproduce. They do it out of necessity and by strengthening the darkspawn or not wiping them out if you have the capability you are at least tacitly complicit in what happens to these women. Granted the darkspawn can't help their biology and maybe it isn't fait that their mere existance is threat to ours but that's just how their species works and until another method of reproduction becomes available, they will never be able to exist completely seperate from other peoples.

anyway, using meta-knowledge we actually know that the architect won't need any/much more grey warden blood, since it wasn't mentioned in the epilogue

That can't affect your decision anymore than The Calling does because your Warden isn't psychic. If they were there would be no moral dilemmas. 'Oh, Bhelen is a great king and Harrowmont fails and dies' 'Golems could theoretically be used to help the dwarves but she either takes the anvil back to the deep roads or kidnaps surfacers' 'recruiting Loghain would mean Alistair and I don't have to die against the Archdemon' 'If I don't insist I'm Queen now it'll never happen' 'Oh, look, Morrigan's demon-baby grows up to usher in a new era of worldpeace where the darkspawn can reproduce on their own and the Chantry has no political power' 'Leaving Anora on the throne alone screws the city elves' 'Irving, despite his incompetence in dealing with Uldrid, CAN put the Circle back together' 'Helping Brother Burkel will lead to a potential Exalted March but if not helping Dagna will.' You have to take what the game gives you and go from there, ignoring what you know will come after because you can't know.

Modifié par Sarah1281, 28 mars 2010 - 06:58 .


#1015
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

So basically all the talk against the Architect goes on the fact 1: The Darkspawn is tainted (true) and 2: Being intellegent wouldn't change their nature (assumption).

Being intelligent doesn't change their nature!  They still must prey on humanoid species to breed, they still wreak destruction on human lands, and the Architect is no different except that he makes a more sophisticated and thus more dangerous enemy.  He imprisoned and experimented on you, and then tried to kill you when you broke free; his halls are filled with the horrors of his previous experiments; and at the beginning of the game his pet intends to kill everyone at the Keep except the Grey Wardens he needs to further his own ends.

What is an assumption, and one not supported in the game at all as far as I can see, is that he can be trusted or that it even matters what his motives are.  He's simply too dangerous to let live.

Its true the Darkspawn are still tainted but assuming intellegence won't change their bestial nature is just arrogant. Saying that Darkspawn lacks culture is also downright ignorant. Even in their mindless state the Darkspawn have got their own architecture and prefered weapon style. Granted their culture isn't as developed as the dwarfs' or the surface world's and is geared towards warfare, it should be taken into account that until now they have been the (un)willing thralls of the archdemons, which basicly used them as one giant warmachine.

Ugh, the postmodernism hurts my brain.

Modifié par Addai67, 28 mars 2010 - 06:54 .


#1016
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Addai67 wrote...
Ugh, the postmodernism hurts my brain.


Not only that, but postmodernism rots the brain.

-Polaris

#1017
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Costin_Razvan wrote...

Really? Bregan ( Commander of the Grey in Orlais btw ) sided with him until the Architect killed Genevieve and that was with the Architect planning to turn everyone into Wardens not like now where he merely needs Grey Warden Blood. Utha did the same.

Both were experiencing advanced stages of the taint- in Genevieve's case specifically brought on by the Architect's deceptive dealings, I might add.  I agree that with Utha, though she too had undergone the acceleration process, that she should have known better.

Duncan would not have joined Architect if he had similar goals like in the Calling but you can bet he would have allied him if presented with the offer you are presented in Awakening.

Hm, speaking from Duncan's grave, are you?  Let's try to keep the speculation to something within realm of what we can reasonably say based on the game.

#1018
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages
And remember: Since Duncan was actually around during The Calling what happened then isn't metagaming for him. Image IPB

#1019
Maedryc

Maedryc
  • Members
  • 132 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...

he agrees to fight at my side. thats already a good sign for me.

If you fight Caridin, Branka fights on your side. If you agree to fight Witherfang, Zathrian fights on your side. If you agree to kill all the mages, Cullen wishes he could fight on your side. Does this make any of them moral and/or sane? Not really. The Messenger is told 'fight or I'll kill you' and he chooses the option that might not end in him dead. It really says nothing of his morality or what he will choose to do with his freedom should he live (and the epilogue is metagaming).


Those are pretty different situations and you know it. With both Branka and Zathrian, you basically have to choose who lives, specifically it's either the crazy chick who slaughtered her entire house or the redeemed golem who doesn't want anymore soul-stealing, and either the hate consumed elf or the innocent guys that have been turned into werewolves due to what their ancestors did.
Whatever you do, someone dies.
If you spare the architect, nobody dies.
Apples and oranges.

#1020
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Maedryc wrote...

Those are pretty different situations and you know it. With both Branka and Zathrian, you basically have to choose who lives, specifically it's either the crazy chick who slaughtered her entire house or the redeemed golem who doesn't want anymore soul-stealing, and either the hate consumed elf or the innocent guys that have been turned into werewolves due to what their ancestors did.
Whatever you do, someone dies.
If you spare the architect, nobody dies.
Apples and oranges.


Not at all.  If you spare the Architect you are condoning his plans and his experiences, and we already know the Architect is directly responsible for both Mother and the last blight....so all that blood is directly on the Architect's hands AND making a species that fundamentally views yours as PREY "Reeks of Stupid" to quote Sigrun.

You are in fact choosing who lives or dies in the long term:  If you side with the Architect you are choosing to let the Darkspawn enslave/kill humanity in the long run.  Period.

-Polaris

#1021
Volourn

Volourn
  • Members
  • 1 110 messages
"It's in Hespith's rhyme. "Eighth day, we hated as she is violated." I suppose it could technically mean something else but 'violated' is pretty much accepted as meanig 'rape.'"

Violated can mean many things. Again, can the darkspawn even actually literally rape anyone? Do they have sex organs? Do they have sexual desires? Can they intellectually use rape as a mean of showing their dominance?

It's illogical to assume that 'violated' emans 100% rape since it doesn't make sense. If had the capiocty to rape non darkspawn it would likely mean they were capable of sexual intercourse.

Much more logical to believe that being 'violated' is the very act of being turned into a broodmother as assuredly the process is painful, and disgusting and is the very defintion of being violated.


"If you agree to fight Witherfang, Zathrian fights on your side. If you agree to kill all the mages, Cullen wishes he could fight on your side"

Poor comparison. Zathrian wants to Wuitherfang dead so of course he'll help you. Same with Cullen and the mages.

The Messenger has no personal reason to attack the other darkspawn, and no the threats of killing him, can't be it, because if that was it, he certainly wouldn't approach the GW knowing it could be his death.

Still, even that fear (if he has it) shows that TM is an individual as normal darkspawn aren't prone for to fear. This gives more credence to the fact that DS should be treated as individuals not like some big blob.


"If you spare the Architect you are condoning his plans and his experiences, "
 
No. I don't wantonly murder everyone whose actions I don't condone.
ie. I am not a big fan of abortion (except in cases to save the mother or rape); but I sure as heck would never kill someone because it as that would be wrong.

Modifié par Volourn, 28 mars 2010 - 07:29 .


#1022
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages
Volourn,



In the context of Hespith's rhyme, violated almost always means rape. We have no reason to think otherwise.



-Polaris

#1023
Darkannex

Darkannex
  • Members
  • 362 messages
The Architect wants the broodmother dead. 

And claiming metagame knowledge is unavaoidable. It could be RP'd that we found Duncan's journal-or since it's been 6 months, perhaps the GW has had time to correspond with Weisshaupt. There are ways around that. 

But even excising the fact that the Architect planned genocide - my other points stand. You have not addressed them. 

Modifié par Darkannex, 28 mars 2010 - 07:34 .


#1024
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Volourn wrote...

No. I don't wantonly murder everyone whose actions I don't condone.
ie. I am not a big fan of abortion (except in cases to save the mother or rape); but I sure as heck would never kill someone because it as that would be wrong.


You can not treat Darkspawn like a misunderstood race.  The Darkspawn KILL HUMANITY BY SIMPLE PROXIMITY!

What part of Darkspawn are incompatible with humanity are you missing?!?  Killing off all the darkspawn is simple self-defense. 

BTW, you don't need sexual desire to engage in rape.

-Polaris

#1025
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Darkannex wrote...

The Architect wants the broodmother dead.


Sure, because she is messing up his plan.  The architect (if you read the Calling) is inhuman but can be very persuasive and charming.  However just because he wants to kill the Mother does NOT mean he is your friend.

Read "The Calling".

-Polaris