Geth Knight wrote...
Except Shepard can't prove his visions. The beacon on Eden Prime went kablooey. And the one on Virmire went byebye as well. And even if he had another working one to give to the Council, whose to say that whoever they used it on wouldn't have their mind turned to mush? And *if* that other person's mind didn't turn to mush, they wouldn't make sense of what it meant with out the Cipher, which was part of the Thorian, which Shepard had destroyed.
Shepard could get that asari woman to give the Cipher to someone else, but since she was a follower of Benezia, who was a follower of Saren, it wouldn't be trusted at face value because it could have just been made up by Saren to make Shepard think it was the real thing.
It all goes back to the fact that Shepard can't prove anything due to any and all evidence has been destroyed, except for whats flowing in his own head. I'm sure that BW is wrapping up all these loose threads.
What are you talking about? He used the vision to locate Saren on Ilos. There was no other evidence that he was there. The Mu Relay linked to
dozens of systems and hundreds of worlds. What, are the Council just going to say: "
You didn't use your vision, you just guessed correctly!" ?
Come on.
Cascadus wrote...
Except Shepard did technically prove that his visions led him to the right spot with Ilos, which does prove the vision was genuine.
Yes.
Cascadus wrote...
Although the vision does NOTHING to validate or assert the existence of the Reapers. There are a bunch of flashing lights, garbled images and really cool music.
The way Shepard describes the vision isn't the way it's presented to us. It's funny, but I'd never even considered the possibility that we see it in its entirety, or in the exact same way Shepard does. If we do... huh, disappointing. I figured we just "got the gist".
In any case, what you're suggesting above is that the Council arbitarily decide that the parts of the vision that feature Ilos are genuine but the parts featuring synthetics butchering organics are not. I'm not suggesting that the vision is irrefutable but it absolutely needed to
be refuted during Mass Effect 2 because, at the minute, Shepard looks silly for not bringing it up.
I've got over it, for the most part, because -- whatever they "actually are" -- it is a fact of the setting that the visions
are unclear and Shepard didn't make any mention of seeing sentient starships when he first had them. He referred to synthetics -- "Geth, maybe" -- slaughtering people. It was only later that he started associating those synthetics with the Reapers, and much later that Sovereign made an appearance.
I mean, despite the fact that Shepard says this:
"The vision on Eden Prime. I understand it now... I saw the protheans being wiped out by the Reapers." He doesn't actually understand it at all, since, uh, he's just as surprised as everyone else when it turns out that Sovereign is the Reaper.
I'd have just liked to have seen the Council's rationale for dismissing the vision, as opposed to having to invent one myself.
Modifié par Ulicus, 21 mars 2010 - 04:54 .