Milky Way only has life
#1
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:30
#2
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:32
Or perhaps they can't travel between galaxies
Or maybe what Harbinger meant by "Salvation through destruction" is that they are protecting us from the other galaxies
Modifié par DarthCaine, 21 mars 2010 - 06:34 .
#3
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:33
#4
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:36
#5
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:38
McBeath wrote...
Prehaps they move around from galaxy to galaxy, taking life. Fifty thousand years is a long time, I'd imagine they'd harvest different galaxies at different times, all spaced out evenly.
Except that you actually see them waking up from hybernation. Not to mention that it would take a f**kload longer than 50.000 years to reach the nearest galaxy, even at lightspeed.
#6
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:38
Fromyou wrote...
Why is it that everything that the reapers do is only in the Milky Way galaxy when there are millions more out there
The distances between galaxies are far greater than you think. Even the Reapers may not be capable of reaching them.
#7
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:40
InvaderErl wrote...
Fromyou wrote...
Why is it that everything that the reapers do is only in the Milky Way galaxy when there are millions more out there
The distances between galaxies are far greater than you think. Even the Reapers may not be capable of reaching them.
You don't even see the galaxies themselves, you see the nearest one, Andromeda, where it was 2.500.000 years ago. For all we know, it might not even exist anymore.
You could say you're looking at the past.
Modifié par Dethateer, 21 mars 2010 - 06:41 .
#8
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:41
#9
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:41
Dethateer wrote...
InvaderErl wrote...
Fromyou wrote...
Why is it that everything that the reapers do is only in the Milky Way galaxy when there are millions more out there
The distances between galaxies are far greater than you think. Even the Reapers may not be capable of reaching them.
You don't even see the galaxies themselves, you see the nearest one, Andromeda, where it was 2.500.000 years ago. For all we know, it might not even exist anymore.
True, space boggles the mind.
#10
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:42
#11
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:43
BP20125810 wrote...
That could be a spoiler. i mean the reapers gota come from somewhere. Dark space is WAY to general.
Are you people forgetting that the Reapers need Mass Relays to reach a galaxy they're barely outside of? There's no way in hell of them coming from another one, they obviously originate from the Milky Way.
#12
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:43
Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Here's a more prosaic way of getting perspective on the distances in space (from a lecture by Dr. Blair of John Hopkins):
Imagine that the distance from the earth to the sun (93 million miles, or about 8 light minutes) is
compressed to the thickness of a typical sheet of paper. On this scale, the nearest star (4.3 light years) is at a distance of 71 feet. The diameter of the Milky Way (100,000 light years) would require a 310 mile high stack of paper, while the distance to the Andromeda galaxy (at 2 million light years one of the most distant objects visible to the naked eye) would require a stack of paper more than 6000 miles high! On this
scale, the "edge" of the Universe, defined as the most distance known quasars some 10 billion light years hence, is not reached until the stack of paper is 31 million miles high--a third of the way to the sun on the real scale of things!
Modifié par SuperMedbh, 21 mars 2010 - 06:52 .
#13
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:45
SuperMedbh wrote...
Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-
bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the
road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
Douglas Adams The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
A certain pot of petunias and a sperm whale could not care less how big space is.
#14
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:46
Dethateer wrote...
SuperMedbh wrote...
Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-
bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the
road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
Douglas Adams The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
A certain pot of petunias and a sperm whale could not care less how big space is.
"Oh no, not again!"
#15
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:47
#16
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:48
I think it would be possible to have a single Relay launch you through darkspace to the andromeda galaxy, which is 2 million lightyears away... the only problem is building a receiving Relay on the other side, because I believe the larger ones require a receiver... But yes, I believe the Reapers could easily figure out a way to bridge the gap between galaxies...
#17
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:49
AgrajagDethateer wrote...
What as that guy's name, again? The bat thing that kept getting killed, I mean.
#18
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:49
Dethateer wrote...
InvaderErl wrote...
Fromyou wrote...
Why is it that everything that the reapers do is only in the Milky Way galaxy when there are millions more out there
The distances between galaxies are far greater than you think. Even the Reapers may not be capable of reaching them.
You don't even see the galaxies themselves, you see the nearest one, Andromeda, where it was 2.500.000 years ago. For all we know, it might not even exist anymore.
You could say you're looking at the past.
This. The nearest galaxy to ours (the Andromeda Galaxy) is 2,500,000 light years away. Although Deathateer, I'm pretty sure the death of an entire galaxy is quite an impossibility. Galaxies are made up of a large clusters of stars (with a massive black hole in the middle). Although stars do die, stars are also born so it's not like a galaxy can just go caput one day. The only thing I can imagine would be when the Andromeda Galaxy is forecasted to collide with the Milky Way in 2.5 billion years.
You can read up on this article (very interesting) about finding life beyond our planet. Such as:
[Rasmus Bjork] found, however, that even if the alien ships could hurtle through
space at a tenth of the speed of light, or 30,000km a second, - NASA's
current Cassini mission to Saturn is gliding along at 32km a second - it
would take 10 billion years, roughly half the age of the universe, to
explore a mere four percent of the galaxy.
http://www.dailygala...earth-week.html
Modifié par mjboldy, 21 mars 2010 - 06:56 .
#19
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:49
Modifié par mjboldy, 21 mars 2010 - 06:51 .
#20
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:51
That'll be fun.mjboldy wrote...
Dethateer wrote...
InvaderErl wrote...
Fromyou wrote...
Why is it that everything that the reapers do is only in the Milky Way galaxy when there are millions more out there
The distances between galaxies are far greater than you think. Even the Reapers may not be capable of reaching them.
You don't even see the galaxies themselves, you see the nearest one, Andromeda, where it was 2.500.000 years ago. For all we know, it might not even exist anymore.
You could say you're looking at the past.
This. The nearest galaxy to ours (the Andromeda Galaxy) is 2,500,000 light years away. Although Deathateer, I'm pretty sure the death of an entire galaxy is quite an impossibility. Galaxies are made up of a large clusters of stars (with a massive black hole in the middle). Although stars do die, stars are also born so it's not like a galaxy can just go caput one day. The only thing I can imagine would be when the Andromeda Galaxy is forecasted to collide with the Milky Way in 2.5 billion years.
#21
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:51
binaryemperor wrote...
The milky way galaxy is 100,000 lightyears across. With mass relay technology you can make it through from one end to the other very quickly, the only limitation is that you have to take multiple relays. I think said limitation is only due to obstructions blocking the linear Relay paths rather than the capacity of the Relays themselves.
I think it would be possible to have a single Relay launch you through darkspace to the andromeda galaxy, which is 2 million lightyears away... the only problem is building a receiving Relay on the other side, because I believe the larger ones require a receiver... But yes, I believe the Reapers could easily figure out a way to bridge the gap between galaxies...
They all require a receiver, not only to stop the travelling object, but also to restore its mass. But the thing is that you can't really compensate for 2.5 million years of galactic drift (what TIM's team did is so ridiculous it doesn't even count), because you can't know if the galaxy will still be there by the time you reach it, and you can't exactly make course corrections.
#22
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:55
mjboldy wrote...
This. The nearest galaxy to ours (the Andromeda Galaxy) is 2,500,000 light years away. Although Deathateer, I'm pretty sure the death of an entire galaxy is quite an impossibility. Galaxies are made up of a large clusters of stars (with a massive black hole in the middle). Although stars do die, stars are also born so it's not like a galaxy can just go caput one day. The only thing I can imagine would be when the Andromeda Galaxy is forecasted to collide with the Milky Way in 2.5 billion years.
Of course it can't simply stop existing. But you can't precisely predict where the galaxy will be if you're going by 2.5 million year-old data.
#23
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:56
Well Cerberus did find the gun that shot the Reaper . . . if that thing is BOSS enough to take down a reaper in one hit then I imagine it knows the general direction the reaper flew off inDethateer wrote...
binaryemperor wrote...
The milky way galaxy is 100,000 lightyears across. With mass relay technology you can make it through from one end to the other very quickly, the only limitation is that you have to take multiple relays. I think said limitation is only due to obstructions blocking the linear Relay paths rather than the capacity of the Relays themselves.
I think it would be possible to have a single Relay launch you through darkspace to the andromeda galaxy, which is 2 million lightyears away... the only problem is building a receiving Relay on the other side, because I believe the larger ones require a receiver... But yes, I believe the Reapers could easily figure out a way to bridge the gap between galaxies...
They all require a receiver, not only to stop the travelling object, but also to restore its mass. But the thing is that you can't really compensate for 2.5 million years of galactic drift (what TIM's team did is so ridiculous it doesn't even count), because you can't know if the galaxy will still be there by the time you reach it, and you can't exactly make course corrections.
or it still had a targeting lock *gulp*
#24
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:58
The only thing I can imagine would be when the Andromeda Galaxy is forecasted to collide with the Milky Way in 2.5 billion years.
The only thing I can imagine is how retarded a person must be to believe scientists can predict events that will happen in hundreds of millions years.
Seriously? They can't even predict asteroid paths now, and you are talking a galaxy collision? What the hell?
#25
Posté 21 mars 2010 - 06:58
Dethateer wrote...
mjboldy wrote...
This. The nearest galaxy to ours (the Andromeda Galaxy) is 2,500,000 light years away. Although Deathateer, I'm pretty sure the death of an entire galaxy is quite an impossibility. Galaxies are made up of a large clusters of stars (with a massive black hole in the middle). Although stars do die, stars are also born so it's not like a galaxy can just go caput one day. The only thing I can imagine would be when the Andromeda Galaxy is forecasted to collide with the Milky Way in 2.5 billion years.
Of course it can't simply stop existing. But you can't precisely predict where the galaxy will be if you're going by 2.5 million year-old data.
Nothing in astronomy is precise.
Costin_Razvan wrote...
The
only thing I can imagine would be when the Andromeda Galaxy is
forecasted to collide with the Milky Way in 2.5 billion years.
The
only thing I can imagine is how retarded a person must be to believe
scientists can predict events that will happen in hundreds of millions
years.
Seriously? They can't even predict asteroid paths now, and
you are talking a galaxy collision? What the hell?
Hmm thanks for being civil. <_<
It is difficult to predict the paths of asteroids because they are small in size and we are tracking a very small object's orbit path. An asteroid could be effected in so many ways by the gravity of planets, the sun larger asteroids whatever. Asteroids are effected by gravity because there are objects in space that are larger than it and have a more profound effect on it's path, so anytime it makes in orbit something could happen the next time it goes around that could very likely change it's estimated path of travel.
Andromeda on the other hand is not so easily affected by gravity because it's a freaking galaxy. Pulls of planets stars etc. are going to have an infinitely low effect on it's motion. It has already been confirmed to be heading towards the Milky Way at 100-140 km/sec. The 2.5 billion year is an estimate itself. Scientists have been studying the red shift and blue shift and have found quite a number of statistics on the galaxy including that it is heading for the Milky Way. Personally, I would trust years of science and research over someone screaming conspiracy theories any day.
Modifié par mjboldy, 21 mars 2010 - 07:10 .





Retour en haut






