Letting Anders Die? Is it possible?
#1
Posté 22 mars 2010 - 07:30
Does that mean he dies?
I am playing a very lawful person (by that I mean lawful to the letter not according to what is actually right).
#2
Posté 22 mars 2010 - 07:31
#3
Posté 22 mars 2010 - 07:36
#4
Posté 22 mars 2010 - 07:41
If you think he did kill the templars, just let Rylock have him with no endorsement. He will probably be executed.
#5
Posté 22 mars 2010 - 07:46
#6
Posté 22 mars 2010 - 08:50
Hell I'm all for capital punishment. But if the point is to get some sort of amends then what better way of getting amends than public service the ultimate kind where you kill or are killed.
Modifié par trigger2kill1, 22 mars 2010 - 08:52 .
#7
Posté 22 mars 2010 - 08:54
I am playing a very lawful person (by that I mean lawful to the letter not according to what is actually right).
And legally you have every right to conscript him, no matter what the deluded Templar you have to kill in his quest says. I know she says the Chantry's authority supercedes that of the Crown, but while Alistair might conceivably overstep his authority since he's new, Anora also allows it and we can be reasonably sure that she knows what is and is not within her power by now.
#8
Posté 22 mars 2010 - 08:56
she says the Chantry's authority supercedes that of the Crown, but while Alistair might conceivably overstep his authority since he's new, Anora also allows it and we can be reasonably sure that she knows what is and is not within her power by now.
Well put.
#9
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 02:38
The Chantry likes to think their authority is supreme and so everyone has to follow it much like the Catholic Church in the past. Unless the ruler does something big enough for the people to really stand against him/her, then the Chantry really has no power in the matter even if they have a small army of templar at their command.Sarah1281 wrote...
I am playing a very lawful person (by that I mean lawful to the letter not according to what is actually right).
And legally you have every right to conscript him, no matter what the deluded Templar you have to kill in his quest says. I know she says the Chantry's authority supercedes that of the Crown, but while Alistair might conceivably overstep his authority since he's new, Anora also allows it and we can be reasonably sure that she knows what is and is not within her power by now.
If they try to use those templars for something like that, then the Chantry ends up looking bad and the people will end up fighting against them and there will be a possible split in the relgion much like what happened to Christianity again.
#10
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 10:30
"I will allow it" <_<
I don't need you to allow it Alistair. You can say that to make the Templar back down before I have to melt her face off but I don't need your approval.
The Chantry can't override a Conscription because of Grey Warden authority not the Crown, she also pissed me off.
Modifié par MutantSpleen, 23 mars 2010 - 10:31 .
#11
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 10:42
Chantry is certainly prickly enough for it.
#12
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 10:43
#13
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 10:57
I think they would be pretty foolish to screw with the Wardens again after seeing how the last time they booted them from Ferelden it crippled their ability to face the Blight when it appeared there.
#14
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 11:01
#15
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 11:12
#16
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 11:28
#17
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 11:47
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
If you want to be lawful to the letter, then you have every right to conscript him. However, you do not have the right to destroy his philactery.
True, but I never was quite that lawful to the letter...
#18
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 11:51
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
If you want to be lawful to the letter, then you have every right to conscript him. However, you do not have the right to destroy his philactery.
But it's worth doing so you can mentally mock Rylock later. Obviously, she needed to have a good, long conversation with Sgt. Kylon about the foolhardiness of challenging the Warden.
#19
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 12:04
At this stage you can see what Anders is really about. He was bought into the Circle while he was a teenager. So he does have a point of comparision and understands what life outside the Circle actually means, unlike Wynne or Irvin. This is why he craves freedom more than anything.
He doesn't like following the Chantry line, and disapproves of hunting apostates or maleficarum, but if you have him in the group and talk to Wynne in Amaranthine, you can see that even he is against the Circle completley branching out from the Chantry. So he does undertsand the powerplay and the point of having some policing for mages. When talking to him near the tree outside Ameranthine, one of the lines is "With great power comes great responsibility".
So, you can have him killed/jailed at two points in the game, but to be honest hes one of the better characters, so I normally keep him
Modifié par Nioxide, 23 mars 2010 - 12:06 .
#20
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 12:06
SurelyForth wrote...
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
If you want to be lawful to the letter, then you have every right to conscript him. However, you do not have the right to destroy his philactery.
But it's worth doing so you can mentally mock Rylock later. Obviously, she needed to have a good, long conversation with Sgt. Kylon about the foolhardiness of challenging the Warden.
OMG I SO wanted Kylon with me through this expansion. Those idiots in Amaranthine could take a lesson or two from the Most Practical Man in Denerim!
#21
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 12:47
Nioxide wrote...
He doesn't like following the Chantry line, and disapproves of hunting apostates or maleficarum, but if you have him in the group and talk to Wynne in Amaranthine, you can see that even he is against the Circle completley branching out from the Chantry. So he does undertsand the powerplay and the point of having some policing for mages. When talking to him near the tree outside Ameranthine, one of the lines is "With great power comes great responsibility".
Well this annoyed me to no end becasue I was supposed to have freed the Tower as my boon but that was never spoke of. I argued with Wynne during that scene, my character does not like the Chantry or Templars. I am a Libertarian though so I have always disagreed with Wynne on that.
#22
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 01:27
Conscription can get them in trouble. If it was all cherry pie and daisies, Duncan wouldn't voice any concern over using it, or over Alistair causing problems between the Mages and Chantry. The truth of the situation is that Grey Wardens don't always have the best reputation, and their power is not supreme. Their power is based on the sovereign of the nation they're acting in granting them the free movement required to do their part.
If their Right of Conscription and their power superceded even a sovereign's authority, any time they got in trouble, they'd just conscript the problematic elements. Problem solved! But no, that's not how it works.
#23
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 01:36
MutantSpleen wrote...
Well this annoyed me to no end becasue I was supposed to have freed the Tower as my boon but that was never spoke of. I argued with Wynne during that scene, my character does not like the Chantry or Templars. I am a Libertarian though so I have always disagreed with Wynne on that.
Yes, I asked for that boon as well. I was rather surprised to see a Templar with King Alistair at the very beginning of the game spouting off like that. Having said that if Awakenings only commenced a couple of months after Origins, maybe the requested change has not yet occured?
#24
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 02:08
#25
Posté 23 mars 2010 - 02:18
Nioxide wrote...
MutantSpleen wrote...
Well this annoyed me to no end becasue I was supposed to have freed the Tower as my boon but that was never spoke of. I argued with Wynne during that scene, my character does not like the Chantry or Templars. I am a Libertarian though so I have always disagreed with Wynne on that.
Yes, I asked for that boon as well. I was rather surprised to see a Templar with King Alistair at the very beginning of the game spouting off like that. Having said that if Awakenings only commenced a couple of months after Origins, maybe the requested change has not yet occured?
Don't forget that the epilogue save you import technically takes place "before the epic climax" of the Origins game, as the flavor text reads when you load it up. It's saved before you commence the final battle so that you can play DLC, but the boons don't come into play when you import it because of that.
Edit: I don't think the boons come into play even if you load a post-coronation save, either. I think it was just pushing a bit of lore on Bioware's part, for the world state
Modifié par FigureThree, 23 mars 2010 - 02:21 .





Retour en haut







