Quarians and a new World.
#76
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:16
Which is funny, because that would imply the Geth belief in consensus might have its genesis in a similar belief by the Quarians.
#77
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:18
Shandepared wrote...
Yes. It is.
The quarians had no guarantee that the geth would stay peaceful. If they sat and waited, trying to talk to the geth, then more and more geth would keep waking up. As they woke up they'd get smarter, more organized. The quarians would quickly lose the option of first strike. In short order they'd be at the geth's mercy. That is asking a hell of a lot of the quarians, to risk their entire civilization, by putting it in the hands of millions of accidental A.I. .
Ironic that you'd call their entire race stupid.
So what's the alternative? Fight a war with an army of machines you've specifically designed to be better at combat than you? Yeah that's positively inspired.
I never said it'd be perfect, but the Quarians didn't even try, and they kept on their suicidal war even when they were losing.
#78
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:18
Shandepared wrote...
Symbol117 wrote...
I don't think it would be as that simple. Each Geth platform would have have it's own internal power source that would probably require dismantling the unit to turn off. It's not likely that'd have a button or switch because the believe would be they would accept a shut down command. If they're showing intelligence it is probable they would ignore a shut down command. Trying to dismantle a Geth who has already ignored a shut down command probably wouldn't end well, either. Kinda narrows the options.
The quarians didn't know that most geth were already advanced enough to resist.
If they had known that then things might have turned out differnetly. I put emphasis on might. Knowing that the sentient geth were already extremely numerous would only provide the quarians with the knowledge that they had already lost control of the situation.
What should they do at that point? How would you pursue peace, Symbol117? What would you offer the geth? What would you tell the billions of people looking to you for answers? What precuations, if any, would you take against a possible geth attack? As it would be evident that the geth already have the advantageous position (the fact that they won the war proves they were stronger than the quarians) then how could you possibly negotiate with them at all? You can give them nothing that couldn't just take.
As I said, wouldn't be that simple. What could I offer the Geth? There isn't much I could offer them. They're just emerging as a intelligences, a child for all purposes. The more ideal solution would have been to have a open dialogue to help them understand the whats and whys of their existence. Who knows, maybe there could have been a symbioic that both sides could have benefitted from. We will never know now. The automatic assumption that all AIs will attack organics is all based on fear. And fear will make people limit their options: Fight or Flight
Lets face it, rightly or wrongly, the Geth were attacked. Even an animal will fight back when backed into a cornor. The quarians got mauled in this case because they thought they had every advantage.
#79
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:19
Guest_Shandepared_*
The Angry One wrote...
So what's the alternative? Fight a war with an army of machines you've specifically designed to be better at combat than you? Yeah that's positively inspired.
It is better than sitting on your hands and waiting for the geth to make the first move. If you go to war first then even if you lose at least you might survive. It is also important to remember that the quarians thought only a few geth had achieved sentience.
If you aren't meta-gaming, if you honestly think the quarians should have gambled with their species like that, then you are the one who is stupid.
#80
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:19
Guest_Shandepared_*
Symbol117 wrote...
As I said, wouldn't be that simple. What could I offer the Geth? There isn't much I could offer them.
Then you can't negotiate.
#81
Guest_Spuudle_*
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:19
Guest_Spuudle_*
Yes, Interesting point!The Angry One wrote...
Spuudle wrote...
The whole storyline of the Quarian flotilla strikes me as a bit strange. As said by others, many times, there are many habitable planets the quarians could have at least tried to colonise. Also, they could live in their suits on the surface whilst adjusting to a new environment, as this would surely be better than trying to maintain ships and prevent failures in space? There is no sane reasoning whatsoever, as to why after 300 years, no colonisation (even a small trial) hasn't taken place? I think there must be some other agenda taking place onboard the flotilla?
There is obviously an agenda among the admiralty.
Though it still doesn't explain why some captains haven't given the admirals the finger and gone off to colonise on their own.
Then again maybe some have, and we just don't know about it. I wouldn't imagine they'd be eager to publicise their location.
#82
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:23
Shandepared wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
So what's the alternative? Fight a war with an army of machines you've specifically designed to be better at combat than you? Yeah that's positively inspired.
It is better than sitting on your hands and waiting for the geth to make the first move. If you go to war first then even if you lose at least you might survive. It is also important to remember that the quarians thought only a few geth had achieved sentience.
If you aren't meta-gaming, if you honestly think the quarians should have gambled with their species like that, then you are the one who is stupid.
Right and how is starting a war with the Geth not gambling the species?
You assume that the Geth will make a hostile move at all when they have no reason to, when the only crime the Geth are guilty of so far is asking their taskmasters if they have a soul.
I for one don't see an attempt at peace to be a gamble at all; they could take precautions like evacuating colonies and areas with the heaviest Geth presence and fortifying elsewhere, but outright attacking was a stupid move.
#83
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:24
Shandepared wrote...
Symbol117 wrote...
As I said, wouldn't be that simple. What could I offer the Geth? There isn't much I could offer them.
Then you can't negotiate.
The Geth wanted to learn.
That's what you can offer them.
Again, the first thing the Geth communicated to a Quarian was a question. Not an observation. Not a threat.
To this day the Geth call Quarians the "creators". That right there carries a certain degree of reverence.
#84
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:26
WHy? It was AI they had a problem with and they haven't gone all back to nature on us.Shandepared wrote...
Weiser_Cain wrote...
If you could get robot that build other robots involved...
Yeah, I don't think the quarians would go for that.
#85
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:30
Guest_Shandepared_*
The Angry One wrote...
Right and how is starting a war with the Geth not gambling the species?
They weren't starting a war, they thought they were just deactivating machines. Even if they had known that the geth were already sentient on the whole (which they didnt), it would be less of a gamble to start a war than to sit meekly by and hope that the geth don't.
The Angry One wrote...
I for one don't see an attempt at peace to be a gamble at all; they could take precautions like evacuating colonies and areas with the heaviest Geth presence and fortifying elsewhere, but outright attacking was a stupid move.
Okay, let me explain this to you. If you claim you want peace and then start evacuating civilians and fortifying your armed forces then you are going to tip-off the other party that you don't trust them, that you expect an attack, and plan to attack in kind.
I understand your position, but your position is an inherently flawed one. You aren't seeing just how complex and delicate this kind of thing is. You might compare it to the cold war, or to the recent events in Poland in which the United States installed a missile shield. Why would a shield, a purely defensive object, threaten the Russians and provoke them to take aggressive action?
If you need me to explain why then just ask.
Edit: some typos
Modifié par Shandepared, 24 mars 2010 - 04:34 .
#86
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:32
Shandepared wrote...
Symbol117 wrote...
As I said, wouldn't be that simple. What could I offer the Geth? There isn't much I could offer them.
Then you can't negotiate.
Negotiations are build on interests of each party involved. We don't know the Geth's interests. To dismiss that negotiation isn't possible when there is a lack of information from the other party is rather arrogant, imo.
Modifié par Symbol117, 24 mars 2010 - 04:41 .
#87
Guest_Darht Jayder_*
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:32
Guest_Darht Jayder_*
The Quarians would not have given any quarter to the Geth either. Second, I did not say genocide was justified but what I did say is that the Geth responded with what force they felt was necessary to prevent their own extinction. The Quarians made the first move and lost miserably. It was simply a reversal of fortunes in my opinion. not to mention that the Geth were a fledgling society attempting to understand the nature of their existence when all of a sudden...Quarians come along to deactivate them. In response the Geth, defended themselves and proved to be the stronger species. Hence survival of the fittest.Shandepared wrote...
Darht Jayder wrote...
The Geth responded with what could be percieved as equal force in response to the Quarians attempting to snuff out Geth existence.
No, they did not. The geth wiped out more than 99% of the quarian species. The war was long and that the quarians took such heavy losses means they spent most of the time losing the war. The only quarians who survived were those who managed to flee. The geth slaughtered the quarians and took no quarter, no mercy.
You should consider enlisting in the Soviet Army.Darht Jayder wrote...
Does that mean I excuse it?
Yes, you said it was justified and that means you condone it.
I would also argue that the game does not portray the quarians sympathetically. Any time the geth is brought up in relation to the quarians the player is encouraged to lecture them about their supposedly evil deeds.
People like you are easily manipulated.
#88
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:35
Shandepared wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
Right and how is starting a war with the Geth not gambling the species?
They weren't starting a way, they thought they were just deactivating machines. Even if they had known that the geth were already sentient on the whole (which they didnt), it would be less of a gamble to start a way than to sit meekly by and hope that the geth don't.
Even the Quarians admit they were starting a war.
Okay, let me explain this to you. If you claim you want peace and then start evacuating civilians and fortifying your armed forces then you are going to tip-off the other party that you don't trust them, that you expect an attack, and plan to attack in kind.
Or you're just being cautious, as the Geth would. Performing an action that amounts to leaving the Geth alone wouldn't be an act of mistrust.
I understand your position, but your position is an inherently flawed one. You aren't seeing just how complex and delicate this kind of thing is. You might compare it to the cold war, or to the recent events in Poland in which the United States installed a missile shield. Why would a shield, a purely defensive object, threaten the Russians and provoke them to attack aggressive action?
If you need me to explain why then just ask.
Human nations are inherently suspicious of each other. The Geth were an emerging intelligence, the equivalent of children. Children aren't suspicious by nature, but will respond badly if treated unfairly.
Especially if those children happen to have guns and nuclear weapons.
#89
Guest_Darht Jayder_*
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:36
Guest_Darht Jayder_*
#90
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:37
Guest_Shandepared_*
Darht Jayder wrote...
Second, I did not say genocide was justified but what I did say is that the Geth responded with what force they felt was necessary to prevent their own extinction.
Except that you did say it was justified.
Darht Jayder wrote...
Hence survival of the fittest.
Hence if a criminal beats you to death then he is the stronger man and better able to pass on his genetic material. Survival of the fittest.
Hence if your country is invaded and your people are burned in ovens then the invading country is stronger. Hence, survival of the fittest.
#91
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:38
Weiser_Cain wrote...
It's not exactly star trek but energy is virtually free in ME, the Quarians have some of the best technical expertise around Just building infrastructure with simple heavy mechs should be easy enough for a few quarians to set up, no advanced VI needed. If you could get robot that build other robots involved then one or two quarians getting the idea say 250 years ago could have a perfect, if sterile planet ready for colonization.
Well, energy may not have been a problem, but I doubt they have a strong industrial infrastructure either. There's also the case of bringing seeding water into the planet, finding ways to counteract solar radiation, genetically enhancing organisms so they can create an organic-friendly atmsophere, adding greenhouse gases to maintain a stable comfortable temperature, etc. There's also potential environmental damage for native lifeforms.
I mean they can certainly do better than colonists in garden worlds in pre-fabricated structures, but in the long run why terraform when there are already garden worlds available?
Modifié par monkeycamoran, 24 mars 2010 - 04:41 .
#92
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:40
Guest_Shandepared_*
The Angry One wrote...
Even the Quarians admit they were starting a war.
No, they said they were deacitvating the geth before more of them could achieve sentience and mount organized resistence. This implies the quarians did not expect a war to result.
The Angry One wrote...
Or you're just being cautious, as the Geth would.
That doesn't change anything. If I hear strange noises in my back yard and I walk out there with a gun and surprise a cop what do you think might happen? We were both just being cautious. The problem here is that the geth might think that you are not actually looking for peace, but are instead just buying time until you can attack.
The Angry One wrote...
Children aren't suspicious by nature, but will respond badly if treated unfairly.
Especially if those children happen to have guns and nuclear weapons.
Which is exactly how the quarians felt about the situation. "We knew it was inevitable that they would rebel against their position." When the geth achieved sentience they effectively became the quarians' slaves.
#93
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:42
#94
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:43
Guest_Shandepared_*
bobobo878 wrote...
Well that settles it, the Beth and quarians are both genocidal races and they deserve each other.
You can't commit a crime against a machine.
#95
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:45
#96
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:45
bobobo878 wrote...
Well that settles it, the Beth and quarians are both genocidal races and they deserve each other.
#97
Guest_Darht Jayder_*
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:46
Guest_Darht Jayder_*
[quote]Darht Jayder wrote...
Second, I did not say genocide was justified but what I did say is that the Geth responded with what force they felt was necessary to prevent their own extinction.[/quote]
Except that you did say it was justified.
[/quote]
[/quote]
Um...no. I don't believe I used that word once. Let's leave it at that.
[quote]
[quote]Darht Jayder wrote...
Hence survival of the fittest.[/quote]
Hence if a criminal beats you to death then he is the stronger man and better able to pass on his genetic material. Survival of the fittest.
Hence if your country is invaded and your people are burned in ovens then the invading country is stronger. Hence, survival of the fittest.
[/quote]
For all intents and purposes yes. Evolution and nature themselves are seperate from man made creations such as the concept of mercy. The only reason we have a problem with this when applied to our own species is the fact that we have evolved to the point of sentience and have created a sense of morality. However such contrived notions do not apply to the furthering of ones biological dominance.
#98
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:47
Guest_Shandepared_*
RyrineaNara wrote...
Yes we can, if they are sentient.
Philosophical zombies.
#99
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:47
They probably didn't comprehend death at the time, either. They may have assumed quarian bodies were as meaningless as their own platforms, for starters...The Angry One wrote...
The Geth didn't understand how organic society works.
You assume the Geth had any concept of civilians and children. The Geth are all equals who reach consensus. They may have assumed Quarians were the same. Only after centuries of studying organics do they now know about these things, and now they realise they went too far.
The point is the Quarians forced the hand of a newborn species that was confused and scared and happened to be armed.
There's that too.Solomen wrote...
The reason the council hasn't granted
colonization rights to the quarians is because turians are on the
council. Any planet that could support quarians would be perfect for
the turians as well since d-amino ecosystems are so rare.
#100
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 24 mars 2010 - 04:48
Guest_Shandepared_*
Darht Jayder wrote...
Except that you did say it was justified.
Oh I'm fairly certain you did but incase I confused you with someone else I'll let the matter drop so we can move on.
Darht Jayder wrote...
For all intents and purposes yes.
I appreciate your honesty. We're done here.
Modifié par Shandepared, 24 mars 2010 - 04:48 .





Retour en haut






