125 réponses à ce sujet

[LPPrince]

DoNotResistHate wrote...

It's actually an easy question to answer. On relatively flat terrain the Mako wins because the HH has no answer for the insane range of the Mako's main gun. If the Mako has the high ground the Mako wins because the HH can't engage the Mako until it is close enough to use it's missiles and that is just not going to happen. If the terrain is relatively flat or if the Mako has the high ground it's going to be an easy win for the Mako.

Now in mountainous terrain when the Mako has the low ground and the HH has the high ground the HH would just jump up fire a missile salvo and then hide. Eventually it would wear down the Makos shields and kill it. So pretty much the only way the HH can consistently get kills is if the Mako starts out at a disadvantage.

What this means is that in an actual war you would not send the HH out looking for Mako's that would be a bad strategy. You would also not attack a position fortified by a Mako with a HH. In both cases more likely than not the Mako will see it coming from a long ways off and destroy the HH before it can get anywhere near it. What you would do is find some place you knew the Mako's needed to go and set up an ambush. When the Makos roll through a narrow valley you pop up and make short work of them.

In a fair fight the HH would get murdered but in war the whole point is to make the battle as unfair as possible and both the HH and the Mako could be used effectively in different situations.

Good post.

In the end, we can surmise The Mako is the combat vehicle, thus winning most of the time in a fight.

HH wins exploration wise.

UH OH. EPIC IDEA-

THE MAKO VS THE HAMMERHEAD.

DEADLIEST WARRIOR SEASON 2.

YEAAAHHHH